Channel
@JPSubcultureConfession
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004324097367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JPSubcultureConfession |
| Description | Бот для тейкоф: @JPsubcultureCF_bot Чат: https://t.me/+yuRELRYpKdtiNDQy |
| Created | 26 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JPSubcultureConfession |
@JPSubcultureConfession was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 35 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 35 | +17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 18 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (26 August 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,822 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
48 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5309845497991687830 | 14 | 29.2% | |
| custom 5316808000755758780 | 7 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5363867429137054543 | 7 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5248948900458437393 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5249249947601115846 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5247193388410771752 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5314716987337769011 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5362005474914892090 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 2.08% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 💗💗 💗💗💗💗 🤩🤩🤩 🌸💗очешь анимированные стикеры со своим персонажем? Или со своей ос? Или же со своим любимым персонажем. .🌸 Тогда тебе сюда! 🌸 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩Здесь вы можете 🤩🤩🤩заказать анимированные стикеры с вашим собственным персонажем, ОС или же любимым персонажем 🌸 !!Стикеры делаются в чиби стиле❤️❤️
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
⌢🖤 ᷒ᰰ ❤️𝑎𝑑 🤩𝑛𝑑 🤩𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 ︨ 🩸🩸 🌟ׂ࣮𝆹🥀🥀🥀ㅤ⎯ ू🤩𝒐𝐧࣪𝒇ᧉ𝆋𝓼𝓼𝒊ᦢ𑪍᮫𝒏ᰮ 🎁࿓࿔࿒ 𓈒۫ޯ ᩬᰰ ᩬᰰ𐇽𝆹𝅥🥀🥀🥀🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🤍᪇🥀🥀 ֖ۙ𓏹 😜десь 🗝ы можете ⏝ᩘِ🥀🥀🤩оделиться ❤️онтентом 𓈒ܼ۫෫ׅ по 🗝𝑎𝑑 😀𝑛𝑑 🤩𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 ︵ ᷼ ࣪ ⋅ֻ🖤🖤 ᎒ᮬ 🤩🤩🤩𖹭⃪ܳ⃜𝘁͜ 𝘧о𝘳 🗝αິ𝗸֯𝗲᪾ ࿓࿔࿒ ⏝︶ 😀ак ❤️ашарить ? 🩸🩸⎯ׅ⎯ׄ 🪦 ❤️𝒫 -💕ᦢ𑪍᮫𝘴𝘵 𓏵֤֫ 🤩ules ֶ 🕯 ࣪ ࣲ
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
⬜🥹🥹О9. MIKOTO KAYANO🥹🥹 🤩🤩 🥹🌟🌟relates !🥹 ⬜🤩я микото кинни... или нет? 🤩🤩хочу репостить релейт посты с микото !! 🤩🤩🤩тогда тебе СЮДА 🤩🤩🤩💭💭💭💭💭 🥹жизненные посты для главных трудоголиков~🥹
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
Гайсики, привеее. В общем, у меня такой вопрос. Где в целом вы советуете покупать вещи для Амекажо гяру?? У меня есть хорошие джинсы, да и лонгсливы, футболки тоже к месту, думаю, но хочется также что-то где-то поискать ещё, для пополнения гардероба. Может, в каких-то секондах или барахолках можно найти что-то?? Неанон Виллен @JPsubcultureCF_bot || 𖹭 #тейк #гяру
Signed choca11a
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟😉😀😜 😝😀😗🌟⭐⭐ 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟⭐⭐ 𝐉𝐏𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧
Signed choca11a
Привет!! Те кто смотрел девочек Камиказе, а Ичико является босодзоку? @JPsubcultureCF_bot || 𖹭 #тейк #босодзоку
custom 53168080007557587802🤗1
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
Обязательна ли челка в джирай? @JPsubcultureCF_bot || 𖹭 #тейк #джирай
custom 53098454979916878302custom 52471933884107717521
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
Привет, КФ! А почему гяру ассоциируется у всех с леопардовым принтом и гаваями? 🙁 Я просто сколько смотрю, их всегда рисуют так @JPsubcultureCF_bot || 𖹭 #тейк #гяру
custom 52489489004584373932custom 53638674291370545432🤷♀1
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
Может быть закажу, если деньги будут
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
🍓 Привет кф, как вам вещички #адмтейк @JPSubcultureConfession
custom 53098454979916878303
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
!!! #адмтейк @JPSubcultureConfession
Signed ⸙ꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋꠋก็็็็็็็б̶͌́̓∅̴̛͎̩̮͚̖̐̂
Есть ли люди со спокойным, светлым стилем и минимализмом? #тейк @JPSubcultureCF_bot
Signed ♡⸝⸝ ≦ 𝓢𑇊𑂹𑆾𝗆𝗈𝗍𐺬𑂵𝗋𝗒𝖺𝗀𑑍 ≧
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @JPSubcultureConfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐉𝐏 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 ⋆˚𝜗𝜚˚⋆” (@JPSubcultureConfession), 35 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JPSubcultureConfession.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.