Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jonix😎

Channel

Jonix😎

@JONIX_TG

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,017subscribers

-668 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001674375592
TypeChannel
Username@JONIX_TG
DescriptionВесь эксклюзив только тут❗️ По вопросам сотрудничества 👉 @Jonix_Support_Trading
Created2 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/JONIX_TG

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

52,01752,68552,3517 August 2026 — 52,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,675 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,659 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,646 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,638 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,633 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,607 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,586 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,557 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,514 subscribers18 August 2026 — 52,490 subscribers19 August 2026 — 52,477 subscribers20 August 2026 — 52,461 subscribers21 August 2026 — 52,450 subscribers22 August 2026 — 52,420 subscribers24 August 2026 — 52,402 subscribers25 August 2026 — 52,388 subscribers26 August 2026 — 52,369 subscribers27 August 2026 — 52,349 subscribers28 August 2026 — 52,322 subscribers29 August 2026 — 52,313 subscribers30 August 2026 — 52,388 subscribers31 August 2026 — 52,390 subscribers1 September 2026 — 52,380 subscribers2 September 2026 — 52,359 subscribers3 September 2026 — 52,340 subscribers4 September 2026 — 52,312 subscribers7 September 2026 — 52,251 subscribers10 September 2026 — 52,180 subscribers12 September 2026 — 52,135 subscribers14 September 2026 — 52,118 subscribers16 September 2026 — 52,037 subscribers18 September 2026 — 52,017 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -668. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,917–52,785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:3852,017-20
16 Sept 2026, 02:3752,037-81
14 Sept 2026, 08:3952,118-17
12 Sept 2026, 18:3752,135-45
10 Sept 2026, 21:5652,180-71
7 Sept 2026, 18:2252,251-61
4 Sept 2026, 18:3752,312-28
3 Sept 2026, 06:4652,340-19
2 Sept 2026, 03:0852,359-21
1 Sept 2026, 02:4952,380-10
31 Aug 2026, 05:0452,390+2
30 Aug 2026, 04:0852,388+75
29 Aug 2026, 03:4452,313-9
28 Aug 2026, 05:1352,322-27
27 Aug 2026, 06:3852,349-20
26 Aug 2026, 06:4352,369-19
25 Aug 2026, 04:4752,388-14
24 Aug 2026, 04:2652,402-18
22 Aug 2026, 13:1952,420-30
21 Aug 2026, 05:1252,450first reading

Engagement

161 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 52,017 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,900
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 161 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held161 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total483,960
Reactions total12,356
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,930
Videos
≈1,100
Links
≈569

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 23s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

24,519 reactions across 160 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11,54447.1%
🔥5,73823.4%
👍1,5966.51%
❤‍🔥1,4185.78%
👏1,2985.29%
⚡7993.26%
😎5892.40%
🤩3481.42%
💔2521.03%
💯2150.877%
😁1540.628%
🙏1510.616%
🤯940.383%
🤝910.371%
🤔360.147%
🥴300.122%
👌250.102%
🤣230.094%
🏆180.073%
🥰170.069%
10 further kinds830.339%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 160 of the 161 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 161 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
134
across the posts below
Posts paid on
43
of 160 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JONIX_TG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 161 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC≈2,990 views148 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

Всем хорошего вечера🤝😎

❤121❤‍🔥11😍5🤩4👍2😎2🔥1😇1

26 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC≈2,980 views96 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥66❤13🔥8👍2🤩2😁2😎2⚡1

26 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,070 views50 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ну что, вчера закончилась моя торговая неделя 🔥 Пять дней я специально тестировал наши инструменты по отдельности, а в пятницу собрал всё вместе И вывод простой: по отдельности всё работает круто, но возможность комбинировать инструменты даёт гораздо больше свободы😎 Подстраиваешь торговлю под себя и берёшь от каждого инструмента то, что тебе нужно ➕ Но лучше всего не слушать об успехах других, а создавать свои😈 В…

⚡31❤10👍5💯1🔥1🤩1😎1

25 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC≈4,170 views75 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Самое время вспомнить лучшие моменты! Часть 1 🤝 https://youtube.com/shorts/q4yrnmDAnPY?feature=share

😎50❤12👍7🤩3❤‍🔥1💯1😇1

25 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC≈4,460 views158 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Спасибо банада за футболку😎

❤127👏12⚡9👍5❤‍🔥2😎2💯1

25 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC≈4,820 views146 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤110👍16🔥15😎3💯1🤩1

25 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC≈4,650 views74 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤54👍8🤔4🙏4👏1💯1🔥1😎1

25 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC≈4,720 views60 reactionsread 27 September 2026

стрим сейчас 👆👆👆

🔥49❤6👍4😎1

25 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC≈4,690 views54 reactionsread 27 September 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9AVaGp3mcHP-YAzLF

👍41❤7🔥5😎1

23 Sept 2026, 19:07 UTC≈6,130 views220 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

Вот такой дозняк у меня на вечер, точнее на неделю🤣 23 день уже в таком стиле😎

❤180🔥24👍9⚡3😎2👏1💯1

23 Sept 2026, 12:56 UTC≈6,270 views84 reactions4 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Слил весь депозит? 📉 Сегодня третий день моего челленджа, и я торгую только сам: без готовых сигналов, чисто по знаниям, которые получил на наставничестве у нашего опытного трейдера Получилось заработать или всё-таки слил депозит? 😂 Показал сделки и результат в своём трейдерском канале. Залетайте смотреть 👇 https://t.me/+ZqzTTRcj1a1lZGNi

❤60🔥12⚡5👍4😎2👏1

23 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC≈6,160 views184 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Мощно конечно, всем спасибо за поддержку! 🤝

👏125❤29🤩8💯5👍4🔥4❤‍🔥3🤝3

Showing the 12 most recent of 161 posts we hold for @JONIX_TG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@JONIX_TG edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTCAnonymous Poll1,520 voters approx.

⁉️

  1. Белые71%
  2. Оранжевые32%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTCAnonymous Poll1,200 voters approx.

Может мерс в белую пленку⁉️🔥

  1. Интересно будет37%
  2. Нееее, лучше гелик в черный66%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 161 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

► ► ► Паша ПЭЛ 🟢
@pel_video · 295,309
#1
MANAGER
@MANAGERPEL · 5,435
#2
D_Deneg
@dorozhe_deneg11 · 27,988
#3
𝑴𝑨𝑵𝑨𝑮𝑬𝑹 𝑭𝑨𝑵
@manager_fan39 · 298
#4
ZHDANOVICH
@nikita555kld · 1,788
#5
► ► ►𝙋𝙍𝙐𝙎𝘼𝙆𝙊𝙑🎬
@PRUSAKOV39 · 285
#6
Маша Вольт
@MashaVolt39 · 25,052
#7
Капченый 🐕
@kspcha18plus · 6,942
#8
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,569,936
#9
Медийка
@mediyca · 726,755
#10
Posikmrmrmr
@posikmrmrmr · 4,040
#11
95BORZ Movies
@borzmovies95 · 3,510
#12
В гостях у Булыча
@bulkin_live · 912,561
#13
ДВИЖЕНИЕ РОМАХИ 👀
@Romaxa_39 · 3,988
#14
BUKIN «про ПЭЛА»
@bukin_pel · 2,340
#15
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,204,470
#16
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,415,446
#17
Офис Стила | steel streams
@steelstaya · 213,318
#18
► KALININ - Паша Пэл❗
@KALIN4EEK · 911
#19
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958
#20
Дубровский Синдикат | Жекич Дубровский
@dubrovskiy_444 · 672,038
#21
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701
#22
BLACK RUSSIA
@br_dev · 1,066,176
#23
Дельфинарий Ковалевского
@Kovtg · 72,799
#24
Первый Московский
@mosguru · 3,234,966
#25
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,396
#26
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,524,566
#27
закрыто
@kaerfx · 607 (as read 14 September 2026)
#28
СОЛВАНОВ
@solvanovv · 90,542
#29
Бригада Булкина
@bulkinprod · 168,528
#30
GVR AUTO SHOW
@GVR_OFFICIAL60 · 33,018
#31
𝗣𝗘𝗥𝟰𝗜𝗞 𝗣𝗘𝗟𝗦 🌶
@per4ikpelsoff · 2,242
#32
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 643,829
#33
Дмитрий Bola
@Baltic_bears_security · 2,920
#34
Общага Стаи
@obshakstaya · 138,499
#35
EDWARD BIL
@camon_edward · 351,096
#36
Old Team News
@old_team_news · 29,891
#37
Hamster Kombat Announcement
@hamster_kombat · 20,830,171
#38
ОПГ Лит Энерджи ⚽️
@fclit_official · 95,815
#39
MELLSTROY BONUS
@mellstroybonus · 327,063
#40
HASSLE Online
@hassleonline · 213,633
#41
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 381,759
#42
2DROTS
@twodrotsshow · 212,205
#43
mjrk.39
@mjrk39 · 814
#44

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Маша Вольт
@MashaVolt39 · 25,052
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
СУНДУК
@sunduk91 · 30,261
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jonix😎” (@JONIX_TG), 52,017 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JONIX_TG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.