40k, 2x & drop 13k

Channel
J Mania | Channel
@JManie_Channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
432subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001905410745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JManie_Channel |
| Description | Full time on all chains Owner: @JMania402 𝕏: https://twitter.com/JMania402 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JManie_Channel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 432 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 432 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 431 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.4%
- avg views ÷ 432 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 114
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.63%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,277 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,680
- Videos
- ≈3
- Links
- ≈1,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10 | 58.8% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 29.4% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 11.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
$CASHCAT live on Robinhood spot
🔥1
20k -> 32k, 60% 🚀
🔥1
High risk $CASHFROG #ROBINHOOD (~15k) 0x57e4783F10Db57Cb8Df1d0b0951E1fef960443Aa https://x.com/cashfrog_x/status/2085331140236157264?s=46 https://pools.trade/t/0x57e4783F10Db57Cb8Df1d0b0951E1fef960443Aa https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_JMania402_b_0x57e4783f10db57cb8df1d0b0951e1fef960443aa
After spending weeks consolidating around the 40M range, $CASHCAT finally seems to be attracting attention again. I mentioned $FIH earlier when most of the major Robinhood Chain runners were still showing little to no signs of recovery. Now, if $CASHCAT is starting to regain momentum as well, the question is whether this is just a relief bounce or the beginning of a broader rotation back into the OG Robinhood plays.…
$BELIEVE #ROBINHOOD My entry: 50k 0xf9ba053b2c5d94cee9b13fa86df32a3090e2cf66 $BELIEVE on #SOL ath 3M Instead of relying on animal memes or short-term hype, it is built around a simple message: "Believe. And the rest follows." — emphasizing conviction, diamond hands, and patience before the market catches on. https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_JMania402_b_0xf9ba053b2c5d94cee9b13fa86df32a3090e2cf66
🔥2
Still fly, 200k -> 2.4M
While most of the previous runners like $CASHCAT and $JUGGERNAUT are still showing little to no signs of recovery, $FIH is quietly starting to capture attention again. The Vlad narrative, over 10% of the supply already burned, and steady organic growth are bringing fresh eyes back to it. Still one of the strongest animal meme plays on Robinhood Chain. https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_JMania402_b_0x4b3a3ff4ec9d28…
❤2🔥1
160k, 3x https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_JMania402_b_0x69407e3441f66cc735d6a611374da3ffa7da6aad
🔥3👏2
50k -> 100k, 2x Early narratives keep paying 🔥
$TOAD #ETH (~50k) First token launch on #PEPE 0x69407E3441f66CC735D6A611374Da3fFA7dA6aAd https://ribbitswap.app/ https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_JMania402_b_0x69407e3441f66cc735d6a611374da3ffa7da6aad
❤2
🚀🚀🚀 https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_JMania402_b_0xeaf7ac0fdf150cdd89340fb762d83848de6a7b83
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JManie_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“J Mania | Channel” (@JManie_Channel), 432 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JManie_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.