Channel
@JKEClub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003967322944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JKEClub |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 19 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JKEClub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 160 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 156 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 156 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (19 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 728 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
97 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 54.6% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 21.6% | |
| 🕊 | 17 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
How's it going, everybody! 🏌️ Tomorrow we're going to talk about Traveling and Culture! 🛫 ◾ I feel like we can all agree that staying in one place for extended periods of time can drive anyone crazy. ◾ But the world is so large and complicated that it becomes difficult to end up going anywhere. 🗨️ So let's all gather at our speaking club tomorrow and learn about each other's traveling experiences! 🌍 Have you bee…
❤4👍3
“Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?” “That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,” said the Cat. “I don’t much care where — ” said Alice. “Then it doesn’t matter which way you go,” said the Cat. “ — so long as I get somewhere,” Alice added as an explanation. “Oh, you’re sure to do that,” said the Cat, “if you only walk long enough.” 🔶 Oppressive laws, forced conformity, erasure o…
❤4🔥3
Howdy, everybody! Tomorrow's discussion is going to be about Sports! 🏟️ ◾ Apart from providing obvious physical benefits, playing sports is a great way to boost your mood, confidence, focus, and discipline. ◾ In case you have these qualities in short supply, maybe picking up sports was the answer all along! ⚽ Is it important for you to have a stadium experience when you want to watch a game? Or do you think that …
❤3👍1
✨ There will be a free giveaway! 🎁 Simply come to the meeting for a chance to win this awesome copy of Ray Bradbury's short story collection, The Illustrated Man! 📚
👍7❤1
Nobody listens anymore. I can't talk to the walls because they're yelling at me, I can't talk to my wife; she listens to the walls. I just want someone to hear what I have to say. If you, like Guy Montag, simply want to be heard, don't pass up the opportunity to join our monthly Book Club on Monday! 🔶 Fahrenheit 451 is filled to the brim with resonant themes that have only gained relevance since it was written. Te…
👍5❤2
Hey, guys! 🧑💻 Tomorrow we're discussing TV Series. And what's better than talking about shows that we can't stop watching? I feel like most people have found themselves binge watching a good TV show deep into the night. Come along tomorrow and share your thoughts on your favorite series! What do you think about the most popular shows like Breaking Bad, The Game of Thrones, Twin Peaks, Stranger Things, etc.? Thin…
❤5
Hey everyone! I hope you’re all doing well! Tomorrow, we're talking about Movies! 🎞 ▪️We’ll share the movies we’ve seen recently and chat about our favorite directors and actors, exploring what makes them stand out among the rest. ▪️We’ll also discuss various film genres, styles, time periods, and international cinema. 🥷 Does watching movies in English help you improve your language skills? Do you prefer using su…
❤4🥰1
Howdy, people! 🤠 Tomorrow we're discussing our Habits. ◾We’ll discuss good and bad habits, motivation, self-control, and the difference between a routine and an addiction. 🧘 Why are bad habits often easier to form than good ones? 🎯 Are our habits a reflection of who we are or do they create who we become? 🎰 How does stress, boredom, loneliness, etc. influence our habits? ◾If that sounds interesting, make sure to …
❤2👍2
File, posted without a caption
❤4
If you don't want a man unhappy politically, don't give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none. Let him forget there is such a thing as war. If the government is inefficient, top-heavy, and tax-mad, better it be all those than that people worry over it. You've just read a passage from Ray Bradbury's classic 1953 novel Fahrenheit 451. ▪️Set in a society where books are outl…
❤4👍1
Hello, everybody! Tomorrow's club is going to be dedicated to Videogames 🎮 ▪️We'll cover everything from gaming setups and consoles to the cultural significance of videogames. I bet it's going to be a fun topic for everybody! 🕹 Do you consider yourself, what they call, a "gamer"? Have you been one in the past? Which games are your favorite? 🕹 How do you feel about videogame violence? Is it unhealthy to play violen…
❤3👍2
⚠️ Guys, I have some important news about the book club tomorrow. I've lost both of my grandmas this week, one of whom passed away today. I was planning to return from my hometown just in time for the meeting, until I learned that I'll have to stay for the second funeral. That being said, I am going to have to put the meeting off until next Monday. I've been very passionate about this project, and I hope we'll ge…
🕊17❤4🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @JKEClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 786,467 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇬🇧 Jaani Kirik English Club” (@JKEClub), 160 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JKEClub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.