Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ 𝖩𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 ! ! !

@JANCY_CF

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

297subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003259131062
TypeChannel
Username@JANCY_CF
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JANCY_CF

Growth

29710 Aug 2026, 07:01 — 297 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 19:23 — 297 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:0110 Aug 2026, 19:23
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:23297no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:01297first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 297 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
36.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held19 (12 April 202628 July 2026)
Views total57
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

312 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53955489891080327907323.4%
custom 54092097725430869846821.8%
custom 54111098574849048886219.9%
custom 54539044950104161055517.6%
custom 53955179837391240575116.3%
custom 540659010448553249320.641%
custom 540690702153237042310.321%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC57 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

⤷ 𓏵 :: Привет я вспомнила про существование этой конфы Неанон Рёко 𓂃 #take ⤿ @JANCYY_CF_bot || @JANCY_CF

custom 539554898910803279013custom 54092097725430869844custom 54539044950104161054

Signed . . . amikk !

11 Jun 2026, 19:37 UTC181 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

⤷ 𓏵 :: кф живи....... немног отстаёт , не судите строго 🥺🥺 𓂃 #take ⤿ @JANCYY_CF_bot || @JANCY_CF

custom 540920977254308698415custom 53955489891080327906custom 54111098574849048886

Signed °𝐶𝑜𝑙ℊ𝑎𝑡𝑒ೀ#𝐓𝐇. ࣪ ₊#𝐋𝐈𝐁𝕷𝐨𝐯𝐞 . ࣪ ₊ ഒ𝐓𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐫 [🤍] #𝗜𝗡𝗞 {ШВУРПАВЕРТ}

4 Jun 2026, 20:36 UTC234 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

[💌]- я прошу прощения за такой формат публикации, у меня нет тгп чтобы оформить этот тейк потому что в нем используются эмодзи. Я очень благодарна тейку. Сама не знаю живы ли мы

custom 54111098574849048885custom 54539044950104161053custom 53955489891080327902

Signed °𝐶𝑜𝑙ℊ𝑎𝑡𝑒ೀ#𝐓𝐇. ࣪ ₊#𝐋𝐈𝐁𝕷𝐨𝐯𝐞 . ࣪ ₊ ഒ𝐓𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐫 [🤍] #𝗜𝗡𝗞 {ШВУРПАВЕРТ}

4 Jun 2026, 20:36 UTC225 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

а нужно как бы кф возрождатб да 🥺🥺 привет, кф, простите за тейк, хочу своим хедом поделиться (надеюсь кф ещё хоть чуть-чуть жив) 📷📷 в первом сезоне когда джонатан ночевал у нэнси, она прижалась к нему поздно ночью, ведь не могла уснуть из-за демогоргона. байерс сначала делал вид что спит, но потом не удержался и приобнял девушку (та приблизилась ещё сильнее, просто из-за того что было страшно).

custom 541110985748490488811custom 54092097725430869843

Signed °𝐶𝑜𝑙ℊ𝑎𝑡𝑒ೀ#𝐓𝐇. ࣪ ₊#𝐋𝐈𝐁𝕷𝐨𝐯𝐞 . ࣪ ₊ ഒ𝐓𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐫 [🤍] #𝗜𝗡𝗞 {ШВУРПАВЕРТ}

28 May 2026, 04:00 UTC256 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

😈— а где ваше собственно весь контент по Джэнси, понять не могу

custom 54092097725430869844

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

26 May 2026, 10:07 UTC257 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну почему бы и нет, собственно, давайте возрадимся 😞

custom 53955179837391240579custom 53955489891080327906custom 54111098574849048883

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

26 May 2026, 10:04 UTC250 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Хмхмххмхм, хмм

custom 54111098574849048885

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

26 May 2026, 09:59 UTC254 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

😈— Правда думайте нужно)? Я подумаю, правда

custom 54111098574849048888custom 53955489891080327903

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

26 May 2026, 09:59 UTC258 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

⤷ 𓏵 :: вам не кажется, то что кф, являющееся смыслом моей жизни уже можно возрождать? не анон нуви 𓂃 #take ⤿ @JANCYY_CF_bot || @JANCY_CF

custom 539554898910803279010custom 54092097725430869844custom 53955179837391240573

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

26 May 2026, 09:58 UTC173 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⤷ 𓏵 :: Нарисовала золотых!! @kasamshi 𓂃 #take ⤿ @JANCYY_CF_bot || @JANCY_CF

custom 539551798373912405714custom 54111098574849048882

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

7 May 2026, 14:06 UTC264 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ochen_strannye_dela_5Photo

☄️ Наталия Дайер и Чарли Хитон вместе уже 10 лет! Их отношения начались в 2016 году. Любите эту пару?❤️ 🌟 ЧИТАЙ ОЧЕНЬ СТРАННЫЕ ДЕЛА В MAX

custom 545390449501041610516custom 53955179837391240571

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

2 May 2026, 14:14 UTC285 views32 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

⤷ 𓏵 :: Я никогда не прощу Дафферам их расставание Неанон Рёко (тгк @ryokosted) 𓂃 #take ⤿ @JANCYY_CF_bot || @JANCY_CF

custom 539554898910803279015custom 54092097725430869849custom 53955179837391240576custom 54111098574849048882

Signed @ 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘤 ⸝⸝

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JANCY_CF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 873,988 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ 𝖩𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 ! ! !” (@JANCY_CF), 297 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JANCY_CF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.