Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

-ᴘᴏᴅsᴏʙᴋᴀ ᴊᴇғғʀᴇʏ![ꜱᴇᴍɪʀᴇꜱᴛꜰᴏʀᴇᴠᴇʀ]

@J3ffr1x

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

58subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002747228132
TypeChannel
Username@J3ffr1x
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/J3ffr1x

Growth

5812 Aug 2026, 12:18 — 58 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:05 — 58 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 12:1812 Aug 2026, 22:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:0558no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:1858first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.0%
avg views ÷ 58 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.8
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total475
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52469126178086966172627.7%
custom 52201177986126730052223.4%
1617.0%
🔥1111.7%
❤‍🔥88.51%
custom 543156582034809613366.38%
custom 522668378999596816944.26%
custom 522910818736542193111.06%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @J3ffr1x. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC20 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Добрый вечер вам мои хорошие.😛 Я сейчас в не очень удобном положении чтобы рисовать. На данный момент мы меняем пол в комнате по этому большинство вещей пришлось убрать, в том числе и стол. Я конечно немного порисовал на полу но у меня потом спина болела так что я решил взять небольшой рест пока у нас всё не закончится. Но я всё же буду понемногу рисовать! #щп

2custom 52469126178086966172custom 52266837899959681691

11 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chertopolokhbPhoto

Мошенники создают ботов с юзернеймом художников и через них предлагают купить якобы подписку за звëзды. Не ведитесь! Также проверьте свои каналы и предупредите аудиторию, под разнос попадают даже самые маленькие авторы

1

30 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC52 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

—Ладно добрый вечер вам солнышки! —Потихоньку падаю признаки жизни.Да я стал не таким активным но постепенно когда раберусь со всеми артами, буду занимать своими ос. Буду рисовать редиз ног Джеффу как эксперименту, поменяю одежду Джеффа и Полины,и немного у Алёны. 🃏 —А так меня довольно неожидано но попросили нарисовать артик...я хочу попробовать себя чуть в рисовании фонов и другом так что буду стараться и развивать

2custom 54315658203480961332custom 52201177986126730051custom 52469126178086966171

27 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC69 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"— после того как дорисую арты которые есть приму участие в конкурсе.Спешить я не буду 🙈 #щп

custom 52201177986126730052custom 52266837899959681691custom 52469126178086966171

27 Jul 2026, 05:37 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @LavkaEmoMalina_0Photo

🪦🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🪦 🔤🔤🔤 Лавка Эмо Малины ⭐️Суть конкурса нарисовать моего персонажа Лоренцо 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⭐️Быть подписанным на канал (без отписок в дальнейшем) ⭐️Репост этого поста в свой тгк/3 друзьям/пиар чат +1000 ⭐️Два пруфа под этот пост, пруф подписки и репоста🪦 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 1⃣🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤700 рублей, закреп вашей анкеты на 7 дней, фулл арт 2⃣🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤500 рублей, закреп вашей анкеты на 6 дней, арт - заливка 3⃣🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤300 рублей,

custom 52266837899959681692custom 52201177986126730051custom 54315658203480961331

25 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC56 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

—ДОБРЫЙ ДЕНЬ Я ДОРИСОВАЛ ЭТОТ СКЕТЧ ПОБЕДА.😌 —Теперь буду рисовать ответку в аск. Я должен жить и хотя бы подавать признаки жизни..😁 #рисуночки #арт #Поппиплейтайм #ос

🔥7custom 52201177986126730055custom 524691261780869661732

20 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Добрый день мои хорошие, я хочу немного пояснить за то что так долго толком ничего не выкладывал.😁 -У самого меня несколько дней не было мотивации на рисовании да и вообще не хотелось нарисовать...НО всё таки я вчера принялся за работу и уже на сегодняшний день я покрасил 3х чибиков!🙈 Возможно скину мини спойлеры возможно нет, но хочу сказать что как только я закончу со всеми идеями. Хочу устроить мини такой интеракт

custom 52201177986126730052custom 52469126178086966171

9 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC100 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

1custom 52201177986126730051

9 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC102 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

—ловите небольшие каракули завтра просто небольшой покрасик так же сделаю🙈 —а так спокойной ночи вам! #рисуночки #ос #Поппиплейтайм

custom 52469126178086966177custom 522011779861267300521custom 52291081873654219311

8 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC81 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

—спокойной ночи мои любимые крольчата! —сладких снов вам!❤️ #щп

custom 52201177986126730056🔥3custom 52469126178086966173

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @J3ffr1x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 788,420 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-ᴘᴏᴅsᴏʙᴋᴀ ᴊᴇғғʀᴇʏ![ꜱᴇᴍɪʀᴇꜱᴛꜰᴏʀᴇᴠᴇʀ]” (@J3ffr1x), 58 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/J3ffr1x.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.