Обратная связь Друзья, мы подготовили небольшую форму, чтобы узнать ваше мнение о Telegram-канале. Опрос полностью анонимный и займет всего 2–3 минуты. Ваши ответы помогут понять, что вам нравится больше всего, а что можно улучшить. Мы будем благодарны каждому, кто найдет время поделиться своим мнением. Особенно приветствуем конструктивную критику и предложения — именно они помогают делать канал лучше. 🥰 ❋ https://…

Channel
Mr0x45xploit
@IzHmfluzM81OTAy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,924subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002611238785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IzHmfluzM81OTAy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IzHmfluzM81OTAy |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 1,924 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 1,920 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 1,918 | +3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 1,915 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 1,913 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 1,912 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,910 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 1,908 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 1,904 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 1,905 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 1,899 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 1,894 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,893 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 1,893 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 20s
- Average length
- 1m 07s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 29 | 25.9% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 20.5% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 19.6% | |
| 😈 | 10 | 8.93% | |
| custom 5226662903569989373 | 4 | 3.57% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.893% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Вите надо выйти Опубликована свежая уязвимость Zapscape, позволяющая выполнить KVM Escape и выйти из виртуальной машины на хост. Цепочка эксплуатации начинается с одной небольшой логической ошибки в KVM и заканчивается выполнением собственного кода с правами root на хостовой системе. Проблема возникла из-за того, что KVM сначала проверял корректность внутренних данных, а затем сам же мог изменить их во время очистк…
👍2🔥2
Скованные одной цепью Новая атака ChainDrop стала одной из крупнейших кампаний, направленных против цепочки поставок npm. За несколько часов самораспространяющийся червь заразил более 1300 пакетов, используя украденные учётные данные мейнтейнеров для публикации новых вредоносных релизов. В заражённые версии добавлялись preinstall скрипт setup.mjs и обфусцированный загрузчик Math_Symbol.js. После запуска вредонос со…
❤3👍3
ИИшница Если вам казалось, что AI Red Teaming удовольствие не из дешёвых, то не совсем. Джейсон Хаддикс ещё пару лет назад запустил бесплатную платформу aipwn.me, а этим летом она получила крупное обновление, в котором появилось ещё 12 новых лабораторных работ. По сути это интерактивная киберпесочница для практической отработки AI Red Teaming. Здесь можно потренироваться в поиске уязвимостей LLM, prompt injection, о…
👍3custom 52266629035699893732
Дайджест за июль Подборка самых интересных новостей, которые вы могли упустить. ❋ Januscape — 16-летняя уязвимость в KVM/x86, позволяющая выйти из виртуальной машины на уровень гипервизора. ❋ AsyncAPI — Supply chain-атака, в ходе которой официальный CI/CD проекта самостоятельно выпустил и подписал вредоносные npm-пакеты. ❋ Nightmare Eclipse — Продолжение нашего уже постоянного сериала о конфликте исследователя с …
🔥6
Photo, posted without a caption
Саботаж Инфраструктура AsyncAPI была использована для распространения вредоносного кода. 14 июля злоумышленники смогли внести изменения в репозиторий проекта, после чего официальный CI/CD самостоятельно выпустил заражённые обновления нескольких npm-пакетов. Атака затронула два репозитория AsyncAPI. В обоих случаях злоумышленник внедрил вредоносный код, после чего официальные GitHub Actions автоматически опубликовал…
👍5
Варианты ответа:
- Смонтировать cgroupfs и использовать release_agent для запуска процесса на хосте.20%
- Выполнить nsenter -t 1 -m -u -n -i и перейти в namespaces хоста.12%
- Загрузить eBPF-программу через kprobe для наблюдения за событиями хоста.46%
- Создать симлинк на /var/lib/kubelet/pki и получить сертификат kubelet.23%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Невидимый наблюдатель Сегодня разбираем современный Kubernetes и возможности eBPF. Вы получили RCE внутри служебного пода (например, агента мониторинга). Кластер в целом использует Restricted Pod Security Standard, однако для этого пода сделано исключение: ему выданы CAP_BPF и CAP_PERFMON. Предположим, что политика ядра (LSM/Lockdown) позволяет загружать необходимые eBPF-программы. Какой вариант открывает наиболее…
Смотря какой diff, смотря сколько object В исследовании показали, как две ошибки управления памятью в библиотеке удалось превратить в полноценную цепочку RCE для GitLab через обработку diff. Одна из этих уязвимостей оставалась незамеченной более шести лет. При открытии diff, GitLab автоматически анализирует содержимое .ipynb, чтобы отобразить изменения. Именно во время обработки первая ошибка позволяет раскрыть рас…
❤4😁4👍1🔥1custom 52266629035699893731
#MemeFriday ✈️ Mr0x45xploit
😁8❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IzHmfluzM81OTAy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Варианты ответа:
- Смонтировать cgroupfs и использовать release_agent для запуска процесса на хосте.20%
- Выполнить nsenter -t 1 -m -u -n -i и перейти в namespaces хоста.12%
- Загрузить eBPF-программу через kprobe для наблюдения за событиями хоста.46%
- Создать симлинк на /var/lib/kubelet/pki и получить сертификат kubelet.23%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Варианты ответа:
- name; SELECT pg_sleep(5) FROM pg_shadow WHERE usename='admin'--23%
- 1 UNION ALL SELECT id, name, category, password FROM users--25%
- CASE WHEN (SELECT substr(password,1,1) FROM users LIMIT 1)='a' THEN name ELSE category END42%
- CAST((SELECT substring(password,1,1) FROM users LIMIT 1) AS int)11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mr0x45xploit” (@IzHmfluzM81OTAy), 1,924 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IzHmfluzM81OTAy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.