Channel
@IzCaponee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
115subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001967966386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IzCaponee |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IzCaponee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 115 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 117 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 117 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
167 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 38.3% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 25.1% | |
| 🤡 | 33 | 19.8% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.59% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 3.59% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 3.59% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.40% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 2.40% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.599% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2025 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сделали небольшой масс‑сбор на семейные захваты. На вышке было бы 12 k репутации, но, увы, многие печеньки уходили с тт. Из‑за большого количества людей на хате вылетело у 10–20 человек. 😅
❤14🤡12
Доброго времени суток! Ну вот и подошёл к концу сезон. Я думал, что он будет обычным и забудется быстро, но, на самом деле, получился очень даже хороший сезон. Всем спасибо, кто старался искренне для семьи и всячески нас поддерживал! Хочу поблагодарить за достойный отпор и масштабное проведение захватов семей такие семьи, как Shelby Company и Tetyv Family. 🤝 По моему мнению, получилось очень даже неплохо. Хоть со…
❤6👍6🤡2❤🔥1
Сегодня на таком❤️
❤16🤡10🤮4💩3
Привет, дружище! Ровно через 10 минут начинается анрип Al Capone. Сбор у fh7545. Ждём тебя снова в нашем прайме!
❤8🤡5
Анрипать Al Capone на 44 сервере?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Возрождение легенды Al Capone Вернулись не просто так, а с новой силой, с железной решимостью и неукротимым желанием восстановить былое величие. Никакой пощады. Никаких компромиссов. Только холодный расчёт и безжалостная решительность. Каждый, кто встанет на нашем пути, пожалеет об этом. Каждый, кто посмеет бросить вызов, исчезнет без следа. ----------------------- В 14:50 по московскому времени (через 30мин) пройдё…
🤡4
Значит все хотят Анрип Al Capone вновь на Владивостоке?
❤10💩3😱1
Прикупил себе два новых тс ------------------------------ Какая по вашему мнению красивее❔ Lamborghini ❤️ --------------------- Ferrari🔥
🔥42❤3👎1
Хотите Анрип Al Capone?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7👎3
Photo, posted without a caption
Забыл сказать, по мск‼️
Калл в 13:20 обсалютно все заходим‼️‼️ ▫️Делаем масс сбор‼️
👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @IzCaponee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Анрипать Al Capone на 44 сервере?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хотите Анрип Al Capone?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2025 to 31 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,241,415 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Batek_Belov | 44 ®” (@IzCaponee), 115 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IzCaponee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.