Channel
@Ivan_Halezov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
227subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001756020677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ivan_Halezov |
| Description | Депутат Совета депутатов муниципального округа Богородское г. Москвы созыва 2017-2022 Обратная связь: @airocat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ivan_Halezov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 227 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 227 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 22 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
155 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 25.2% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 15.5% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 10.3% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 8.39% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.94% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.29% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.645% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.645% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.645% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2024 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пока в России власти упорно пытаются доломать интернет, человечество после 54-летнего перерыва возвращается к Луне. Через несколько часов состоится старт лунной миссии NASA Artemis II с площадки LC-39 (штат Флорида) За страну горько. За человечество в целом сегодня есть повод порадоваться. 🌗 Интересное и увлекательное описание происходящего читаю в этом канале. А прямую трансляцию запуска можно увидеть тут
🔥9👍5❤4
Все. Выборы в Москве отменили ❗️ 4 июля МГИК приняла решение о проведении выборов депутатов Мосгордумы 6-8 сентября в электронном формате. Теперь по умолчанию голосование происходит электронно, а бумажные бюллетени выдают только по заявлению. Такое заявление нужно подать до 2 сентября. По сути, это окончательная отмена выборов как таковых. Это закономерное продолжение политики властей по максимальной изоляции изби…
👍16😢3❤2🤡1🙈1
Как голосовать на выборах 17 марта Дорогие друзья! Наша команда в Богородском уже 7 лет отстаивает интересы жителей района, наших соседей. Но с каждым годом делать это все сложнее и сложнее: 🔶 Усиливается цензура. Ситуации с очевидной коррупцией и беспределом чиновников не получают огласки в СМИ. В стране не осталось независимых медиа, которые могли бы освещать проблемы, волнующие граждан. Одни СМИ закрыты, а дру…
❤11👍11🔥4🤝1
С друзьями из района пришли вчера проститься с политиком Алексеем Навальным В будний день на похороны пришло более 20 тысяч человек и тысячи продолжают идти сегодня на Борисовское кладбище. Мы провели в очереди больше 8 часов, чтобы в итоге попасть на территорию кладбища и возложить цветы. В метро спускались уже в районе 22 часов. Тепло и приятно было видеть вокруг так много светлых и печальных лиц 💔 Алексей хоте…
❤34💔16🕊9👍5👏1
Огромные очереди в штабы Бориса Надеждина В последние дни в десятках городов России выстроились длинные очереди желающих поставить подпись за выдвижение Бориса Надеждина на пост президента. Люди готовы стоять на морозе по часу ради шанса увидеть в бюллетене кандидата, открыто выступающего за МИР🕊и против диктатуры. Москва, Петербург, Воронеж, Екатеринбург, Томск, Казань, Уфа, Новосибирск, Петрозаводск и другие бол…
🔥11❤4🕊4👍2🤡1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Ivan_Halezov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,272,076 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иван Халезов” (@Ivan_Halezov), 227 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ivan_Halezov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.