[✨] - Эххх, вот бы кто-нибудь бустанул канал...🥺
❤2
![Telegram profile photo for [EVENT]~𝑹𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒂˚🪽](https://cdn4.telesco.pe/file/NWo6HKeN-GOeQbjyL8fsCqczStu0FJGOn3P91_8sQTn67fKDRnR6f_wZDBue3GpfEmDs9MiNWrlK5aG9HwZWns4hoMidwd5wOS_64RQJfZmafXv1DzqdxAyl97NiPRp1iC8_i3AAkitYxizGd-grVw9gz-U9aY8-C4i73M9dDe5geqWpy80lzIa7CNKwnifH8GL44NNzwZezhJ7SXMhM1G7zkIxfb0t65YYwoUZbXqEua6TFU9urBet9jFHE1hPPoJHd3f_r5Inoj8ZtDg0_sPWsj8_rv1BwnBO_1EVrPZvHKZobEEJjNW-egWkPBd2UadU5LMpdnF1hpjXbGeFg9Q.jpg)
Channel
@ItsRagatha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003962169049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ItsRagatha |
| Description | It's Ragatha! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ItsRagatha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:22 | 12 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 12 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 October 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 385 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
41 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 13 | 31.7% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 29.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 14.6% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[✨] - Эххх, вот бы кто-нибудь бустанул канал...🥺
❤2
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 °Всем здравствуйте. Давненько не писала. Сначала занята была, а потом... Что-то странное начало происходить с Джексом и его злой версией. Я ходила к Джексу и как только я пришла я заметила за ним странное поведение. Его слова путались местами, и сам он выглядел... Тоже странно? Не знаю... Потом оказалось, что он это не может контроливать. Сейчас он вместе с Помни должен быть. Надеюсь всё в порядке... Я …
❤1🍓1🥰1🙏1
[✨] - Постов не будет, Рагата ушла в педагогический и сейчас ведёт уроки у 5 класса (ладно, всё будет, но потом... Потом)
🥰1
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑹𝑷 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 Рагата, увидев состояние Джекса, засомневалась в том, что ей нужно уйти. Но если она дождётся Помни перед тем, как уйти к себе, то будет спокойна. Она кивнула Джексу и вышла из комнаты, закрыв дверь. Как только она вышла, она увидела Помни, которая ходила туда-сюда по коридору неподалёку от комнаты. °Помни! Рада, что ты здесь. Джекс ждёт тебя. С этими словами она немного отошла от двери, открывая пр…
❤1❤🔥1💘1🥰1
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑹𝑷 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 °Приключение... Нет, это не может быть из-за приключения. Не может же..? Голова Рагаты была забита разными ситуация, но ни одна из них не давала ответа на происходящее. Приключение точно не могло повлиять на Джекса, ведь примерно то же самое происходит и со Злым Джексом. Дело явно не в этом... Рагата быстро среагировала на этот мимолётный поцелуй. °Карма всегда существовала, к сожалению или к счаст…
🥰2❤1👏1
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑹𝑷 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 Рагату сильно напугало состояние Джекса. Он просто резко стал вести себя странно. Особенно её пугали слова про то, что он якобы "засыпал", хотя по факту он просто нёс бред, сам того не осознавая. Все эти факторы очень усложняли ситуацию, не давая спокойно разобраться в ней. °Из-за чего же это... Это всё ненормально, Джекс. Когда примерно это началось и происходило ли что-то странное примерно до этого…
❤2🥰2👏1🕊1
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑹𝑷 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 Рагата сначала не поняла, о чём Джекс говорит. Его слова путались местами. Его широкая улыбка пугала. Видимо, с ним не всё в порядке. °Извини, что? Джекс, ты в норме? Она не вдупляла, про какую полярную ночь он говорит. Разве здесь подобное есть? Или он и вправду бредит? °Ты вообще о чём? #RP_post@ItsRagatha
❤2🥰2❤🔥1👏1🕊1
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑹𝑷 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 Рагата видела все посты Джекса в его канале. А после и посты Злого Джекса... Ей это очень не нравилось. "Что происходит?" - единственный вопрос, возникший в голове. Она решила проведать Джекса, чтобы убедиться, что с ним всё в порядке. °Джекс, это я. Она постучалась в дверь, ожидая ответа. Как же она надеялась, что с кролем реально всё в порядке. #RP_post@ItsRagatha
❤🔥2🥰2❤1💘1😁1
#вп
🥰1
НАБОР В АДМИНЫ!! ✨𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓗𝓸𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓸𝓷 𝓸𝓯 𝓛𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽✨🥹🥹🦷 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟he Horizon of Light “«🔤частье можно найти даже в самые мрачные времена, если не забывать включать свет » — Джоан Роулин 🌟elcome to 🌟he 🌟orizon of 🌟ight 🕊️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🌟he 🌟orizon of 🌟ight — Сетевая по всем фандомам, там, где все примут вас с теплом.😇 #post #rt #mp
🥰1
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 °Может вы хотите мне что-нибудь написать? Там вопросы всякие и т.д.? Можете мне на почту кинуть!@RagathaMailBot (почти) на всё отвечу, (почти) всё приму! #BLOG_post@ItsRagatha
❤1❤🔥1
~𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑷𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽 °Всем утречка! Проснулась и узнала, что НПС теперь тоже считаются "игроками" (как мы) и даже могут создавать свои блоги. Странно, я всё время думала, что они были созданные лишь ради приключений... Даже не знаю, хорошо ли это. Ведь получается моя злая копия тоже когда-то сможет создать свой блог по желанию. Вспомнив её аж мурашки по коже... Ну, надеюсь, что это ни к чему плохому не приведёт! А как у ва…
❤1❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ItsRagatha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ItsRagatha named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[EVENT]~𝑹𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒂˚🪽” (@ItsRagatha), 12 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ItsRagatha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.