A girl's first love isn't a man. It's death.

Channel
𝐻.
@ItsExulansis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
78subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001791389670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ItsExulansis |
| Description | 𝑇𝒉𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟, 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑐𝒉𝑎𝑜𝑠. http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=1181901625 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ItsExulansis |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 78 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 78 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 5 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 321
- Videos
- 62
- Links
- 30
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
People think psychopaths are emotionless monsters. They're not. That's what makes them unsettling. Many of them can recognize exactly what you're feeling without actually feeling it with you. Their emotional empathy is often reduced, while their cognitive empathy can remain surprisingly intact. They can read fear, grief, or love almost like a language, but without emotionally sharing the experience. In many cases, th…
Aww... you really thought you became heartless? :( You probably didn't. Sometimes, after repeated emotional pain, your brain doesn't stop producing emotions, it simply stops letting you feel them the same way. What's fascinating is that your body may still react: your heart races, your chest tightens, cortisol and adrenaline rise, and your nervous system stays on high alert, even if your mind says, "I feel nothing." …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Guys, i love the topic of ;🐍 "Affective neuroscience" "The neurobiology of emotions" "Social pain neuroscience" "Neuroscience of love and attachment"
Photo, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
آستانه درد، شیداییِ کبود، دروغ، فرشته زنده شده رو سنگ قبر، سیگار برگ، دیوارهای فرو ریخته، چشمهای یخی پاسکال، والس روی یخ و گورت رو گم کن ناتانائیل.
You are so holy. Don’t forget that, my dear.
You know sir, "there is hell, and there is another place below hell."
بهتزده، روحی رقصان بود که ردِ سرخ زانوهای دردکشیدهی مرگ را، در نگاه صاحبشان میپرستید. با پرشهای بیجان که میان آن ردهای گمشده سر میخورد، و آن نگاه طلاییاش را در انحنایِ ظریفِ کمرش به عقب، مانند کمانیِ خونی، راهی مقصدش میکرد. ناتانائیلش... مجازاتی برای پرومتهی داغ نگاهش نبود. لیلیثی بود؛ معلق و بیوزن میپرید و حریصانه بر زانوهایش فرود میآمد. نه کامل! فرودی که تنها خاکستری از زمین بلند میشد. در نهایت احترا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ItsExulansis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐻.” (@ItsExulansis), 78 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ItsExulansis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.