Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Орꙋдие И́стины

Channel

Орꙋдие И́стины

@IstinnoeUchenie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

349subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002245774722
TypeChannel
Username@IstinnoeUchenie
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/IstinnoeUchenie

Growth

3453493477 August 2026 — 346 subscribers8 August 2026 — 346 subscribers8 August 2026 — 347 subscribers16 August 2026 — 346 subscribers29 August 2026 — 345 subscribers7 September 2026 — 349 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 344–350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 11:36349+4
29 Aug 2026, 09:54345-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:04346-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:36347+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:50346no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:08346first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9031.9%
❤‍🔥5720.2%
5619.9%
💯3713.1%
👏217.45%
custom 5296544551211651757144.96%
51.77%
10.355%
💔10.355%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IstinnoeUchenie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC453 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Добавлю: Кирилл Александрийский: «Дабы мы веровали, что хотя Его святое и пречистое Тело и единоприродно нашим телам, оно тем не менее величественно, Божественно и находится далеко за пределами наших мер, поскольку соделалось Его собственным. Ибо Он действовал через него, и потому оно было названо также хлебом жизни; более того, воистину сказано, что оно и сошло с Небес, и дает жизнь миру ради Слова, сошедшего свыше

💯11❤‍🔥5🔥52custom 52965445512116517571

10 Jul 2026, 01:10 UTC265 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Комментарии: + Ссылка на Чат: https://t.me/Orudie_Istini

custom 52965445512116517575👏2❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 01:09 UTC159 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Нельзя склеить в одну категорию то, что по определению Кирилла «совершенно различно» «не является подобным» Вы не можете слить нетварную энергию и тварную энергию в одну сложную, потому что тварное не может быть равно нетварному даже внутри "составного - сложного" акта. У них разный способ бытия, разные свойства, разный набор сущностных Действий, а значит — у Христа строго ДВА природных действия, которые осуществля

❤‍🔥6💯32🔥2

10 Jul 2026, 01:09 UTC198 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Кирилл Александрийский пишет: Ведь мы никоим образом не допустим, чтобы природное действие Бога и твари было одним и тем же (ού γάρ δή που μίαν είναι φυσικήν тήν ένέργειαν δώсоμεν Θεού καί ποιήματος), дабы мы либо сотворенное не возвели в божественную сущность, либо, наоборот, превосходство божественной природы не низвели до места, свойственного твари. Ибо у тех, у кого действие и сила совершенно неизменно едины, у

💯4🔥21❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 01:09 UTC202 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Кирилл Александрийский пишет: «“Если смерть может умереть без Моей смерти... пусть чаша отступит... но... не как Я хочу, но как Ты хочешь”. Вы видите, насколько бессильна человеческая природа даже во Христе, как она сама себя обнаруживает...» Св. Кирилл прямо пишет, что слова «не как Я хочу» обнаруживают человеческую природу во Христе. Слово «хочу» — это волевой акт. Если это «хочу» обнаруживает именно человеческую

🔥42❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 01:09 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы спрашиваем Монофизита: Христос принял истинную человеческую волю и истинное человеческое действие как самостоятельные свойства нашей природы? Если оппонент скажет "Нет" — он прямо объявляет святого Кирилла лжецом, ведь тот пишет, что Он принял волю и энергию. Отрицание человеческой воли и ума во Христе — это аполлинаризм. Если оппонент скажет «Да, принял, но после акта соединения они слились с Божественной воле

🔥4💯3❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 01:09 UTC308 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ИТОГО — ВЫВОД: Святой Кирилл Александрийский утверждает: Воля и Энергия — это свойства природы. Раз Логос принял человеческую природу во всей полноте, Он принял её волю и действие. Раз Он остался Богом, Он сохранил Свою Божественную волю и действие. Один и Тот же Христос обладает ДВУМЯ природными волями и ДВУМЯ природными энергиями, СЛЕДСТВЕННО И ДВУМЯ ПРИРОДАМИ принадлежащими Его Единому Лицу. Халкидонский догмат

🔥5❤‍🔥4💯4custom 52965445512116517571

10 Jul 2026, 01:09 UTC243 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кирилл Александрийский [ок. 376–444г.н] [Диофизитство Отцов] ДИОЭНЕРГИЗМ CВ. КИРИЛЛА И ПОЭТАПНЫЙ РАЗГРОМ МОНОФИЗИТСТВА. Сегодняшняя тема - невероятна важна для каждого Православного Христианина. [Вы - Род Избранный (1 Посл. Петр. 2:9)]. Современные Монофизиты НЕ ВЫДЕРЖИВАЮТ Полемики об Аргументе что я вам предоставлю сегодня. Я проводил многочисленные дискусии - где в итоге Монофизиты признавали Свой Аполинаризм

🔥8❤‍🔥5💯31

10 Jul 2026, 01:09 UTC188 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кирилл Александрийский пишет: Вещи, обладающие одинаковым действием и проявляющие одинаковые природные силы, по необходимости должны иметь и совершенно одинаковую сущность, ибо ни одна из существующих вещей не будет обладать в точности теми же силами и действиями, что и то, что различно по природе и сущности. [2] Во Христе мы имеем Два Набора Сущностных Действий - Божественные и Человеческие. Кирилл Александрийский

🔥5❤‍🔥4💯3

30 Jun 2026, 17:10 UTC329 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Комментарии: + Ссылка на Чат: https://t.me/Orudie_Istini

7👏7❤‍🔥3custom 52965445512116517572

30 Jun 2026, 17:07 UTC323 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Итого делаем вывод Святой Симеон Столпник - НЕ БЫЛ Монофизитом. И принимал Святой Халкидонский Собор. Автор: Тимофей Мономах Источники: [1] https://tertullian.org/fathers/simeon_stylites_letters_01_trans.htm [2] https://ru.scribd.com/document/72818709/Brooks-Hamilton-The-Syriac-chronicle-known-as-that-of-Zachariah-of-Mitylene-1899#page=73 [3] https://archive.org/details/zachariah-mitylene-1899/page/74/mode/2up

🔥86💯41custom 52965445512116517571

30 Jun 2026, 17:07 UTC260 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что самое Противное для Монофизитов - утверждение что Св. Симеон Столпник ПРИНЯЛ СВ. Халкидонский Собор, БОЛЕЕ АВТОРИТЕТНОЕ И БОЛЕЕ ОБОСНОВАННОЕ: Профессор Торри - приводят ПОДЛИННОЕ (АВТОРИТЕТНОЕ) Письмо которое Сохранил Историк Евагрий Схоластик - (Евагрий, Церк. Ист. ii. 10): Евгарий сохранил текст письма, написанного Симеоном — Василию, архиепископу Антиохийскому, в котором он следующим образом ссылается на окру

🔥8👏6❤‍🔥53

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @IstinnoeUchenie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Орꙋдие И́стины” (@IstinnoeUchenie), 349 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IstinnoeUchenie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.