Channel
@Istina_Pobedit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
143subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001626715933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Istina_Pobedit |
| Description | Телеграм канал Истина Победит ☝️☝️☝️ Здесь я буду выкладывать только правду Бот обратной связи @IstinaPobedit_bot Второй канал на случай, если первый блокнут ))👇👇👇 https://t.me/istina_pobedit_rezerf |
| Created | 17 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Istina_Pobedit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 143 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 143 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
192 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 61 | 31.8% | |
| 😁 | 47 | 24.5% | |
| 👎 | 34 | 17.7% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 13.5% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 5.73% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 3.65% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.56% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2022 to 3 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Смотреть онлайн тут (включив VPN) https://muhajeer.com/watch/DybaIWtJ4HR2Wg3 Эксклюзивное интервью с бывшим амром И.Г - Абу Хамза аль-Мисри Не потеряйте нас 👇🏻 taplink.cc/assabiqun.media
👎16👍3
🎞 Ролик - "Приложи все усилия!" Для cвязи - @assabiqunof @as_dostupi
👍6🔥1
#ИЭА Сегодня в Кабуле была проведена операция против ИГИЛ. В бою было убито несколько боевиков ИГИЛ, один взят в плен живым. Также были ранены 4 бойца ИЭА, одна мусульманка из женского отдела полиции приняла мученическую смерть иншаАллах. t.me/badr_at_tawhid
👎15👍11
Как мусульман загоняют в борьбу с самими собой на примере Азербайджана и его борьбе в деоккупации Карабаха.
❤7
Скоро ИН ШАА АЛЛАГЬ мы тебя освободим Родной ты Наш Кавказ…
👍22❤4
Уже 4 года как герой Чеченского народа Юсуп Темерханов умер в плену «Российского правосудия» Юсуп Темерханов обвинялся в убийстве полковника Юрия Буданова который изнасиловал и убил в пытках 18-ти летнюю чеченскую девушку. «…в ночь на 27 марта 2000 года Буданов с двумя солдатами приехал на боевой машине пехоты в чеченское село Танги. Все трое зашли в дом местного жителя Висы Кунгаева. Там находились 18-летняя дочь …
❤12👍1🔥1
❗️Смотреть всем. Две минуты "величия" России Protest Live
😁13
Мнение путина Хочет что-ли узнать ? 😁
😁8
После экстренного заседания Совета безопасности Армении которое завершилось несколько минут назад, премьер-министр Армении Пашинян пытается созвониться с президентом России Владимиром Путиным. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 @cispress
😁9👎1
Талибы: можем захватить Таджикистан за неделю Таджикистан может быть захвачен за неделю. Об этом заявил мулла Джан Мохаммад Хамза, заместитель командира 217-го армейского корпуса Омари движения «Талибан», пишет 8am.af. «Талибан» пригрозил Таджикистану захватом, если страна не прекратит вмешиваться во внутренние дела Афганистана. Мулла сделал это заявление в присутствии одного из министров движения, который был с виз…
👍6👎2🔥1
В Подмосковье горит склад российского интернет-магазина Ozon Гори, гори, гори ясно чтобы не погасло 🎉🎉
🎉11
⚡️МИД Азербайджана обвинил армянскую сторону в грубом нарушении договоренностей по Карабаху: «Произошедший 3 августа кровавый инцидент еще раз демонстрирует, что Армения грубо нарушает трехстороннее соглашение, а также подрывает усилия по нормализации отношений между двумя государствами. Это также свидетельствует о неуважении Армении к усилиям международных посредников. Вся ответственность за инцидент на территории …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Istina_Pobedit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,008,899 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Istina_Pobedit named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝕀𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕒 ℙ𝕠𝕓𝕖𝕕𝕚𝕥” (@Istina_Pobedit), 143 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Istina_Pobedit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.