Photo, posted without a caption
❤2

Channel
@Iskra_99999
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003991741609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Iskra_99999 |
| Description | Энергетические чистки человека,🧬🪷 животных, недвижимости, транспортного средства, дела💟🌎🕊️🕉️ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 15 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Iskra_99999 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:23 | 28 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 28 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 29 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (15 July 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 146 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 68.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 10.8% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 8.11% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 6.76% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 5.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
🌙 Сегодня в медитации ко мне пришёл Белый Кролик. 🐇 Я сидела в тишине, дыхание стало ровным, мысли постепенно растворились… и вдруг перед внутренним взором возник он — белый, словно сотканный из лунного света. Он не спешил, не метался — просто подошёл и доверчиво замер рядом. Я протянула руку — и он позволил взять себя на руки. Его шёрстка была невесомой, будто из тонкой дымки, а длинные ушки — мягкими, как шёлк. Я…
❤2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
💙 Тайна синего: цвет неба, глубин и высшей мудрости 💙 Синий — один из самых мистических цветов. Он будто соединяет два мира: бескрайнее небо над нами и бездонные глубины океана под ногами. В эзотерике синий — это не просто оттенок, а целая вселенная смыслов, вибраций и энергий. С древних времён синий связывали с божественным порядком. Небо — обитель высших сил, пространство вечного закона и справедливости. В каббал…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
🌙 Сегодня мой ребёнок опоздал в школу. И я вдруг остановилась посреди суеты и задумалась: а что вообще такое опоздание? В мире, где всё меряют минутами, мы привыкли считать опоздание ошибкой, промахом, чем-то, за что нужно ругать. Но если посмотреть чуть глубже… может, опоздание — это не сбой, а знак? Тихий голос Вселенной, который говорит: «Притормози. Тут не надо бежать». С эзотерической точки зрения любое отклон…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
✨ Самоценность женщины: почему не стоит идти туда, где тебя не любят ✨В эзотерике считается, что женская энергия — это живой огонь: тёплый, дающий свет, но способный и обжечь, если с ним обращаться небрежно. И самое тонкое, самое важное умение — не дать этому огню угаснуть в чужих тенях.Когда мы снова и снова идём туда, где нас не ценят, где наше присутствие будто «терпят», мы отдаём часть своей силы. Эзотерически эт…
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
🍇 Виноград сквозь века: от древних мифов до тонких энергий 🍇 Привет, дорогие подписчики! Сегодня заглянем в прошлое и посмотрим, какой след виноград оставил в культурах и верованиях — и как эти смыслы могут отзываться в нашей эзотерической практике. 📜 Древние истоки: лоза как сакральный образ Виноград — одно из древнейших растений, с которым человек связал не просто пропитание, а целую систему символов. Археологи …
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
🌙 Когда умирает любимый человек: взгляд сквозь тонкую грань миров 🌙Смерть близкого — одна из самых глубоких и болезненных встреч в жизни. Боль от утраты кажется такой плотной, что перекрывает свет. Но именно в этой темноте особенно важно помнить: эзотерика говорит не о «конце», а о переходе.В тонких мирах нет окончательного «прощай». Душа, сбросив тяжёлую земную оболочку, продолжает свой путь. Многие традиции и мисти…
🙏5🕊4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Iskra_99999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИСКРА✨ЭнергоЧистки” (@Iskra_99999), 28 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iskra_99999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.