Iris師傅又一好評(第214份) #抓龍筋 #根骶前列腺 感謝骨友第5次嘅信任與支持🙏,由當初冤痛到叫救命,到依家越做越通爽,硬度與持久度都有明顯提升!定期保健真係好要緊,Iris師傅會繼續用心幫大家固元守護健康!💪
👍2

Channel
@Iris888816
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
169subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002216186350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Iris888816 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Iris888816 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 169 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 170 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 170 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (6 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 321 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
50 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 34.0% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Iris師傅又一好評(第214份) #抓龍筋 #根骶前列腺 感謝骨友第5次嘅信任與支持🙏,由當初冤痛到叫救命,到依家越做越通爽,硬度與持久度都有明顯提升!定期保健真係好要緊,Iris師傅會繼續用心幫大家固元守護健康!💪
👍2
Iris師傅又一好評(第213份) #抓龍筋 #根骶前列腺 熟客第4度回訪!讚嘆Iris師傅獨門泰式抓龍筋配中醫穴位手法,精準舒緩前列腺與深層疲勞,做完渾身通透、精力回籠!
👍2
#Iris 師傅第(212)份好評 #抓龍筋 #專業穴位按摩 客人讚爆!Iris師傅獨門專業手法通穴位,做完腰痛即刻舒緩、瞓得超冧,連「戰鬥力」都顯著提升!誠意推薦!
👍1🥰1
Iris師傅又一好評(第211份) #抓龍筋 #根骶前列腺 骨友第二次覆診,大讚Iris師傅手法專業、細心真誠!做完抓龍筋同根骶前列腺按摩後,全身舒暢,有效改善夜晚淺眠易醒,大便暢通,朝早晨勃更充血有勁!強烈建議各位骨友試試!💪🔥
👍3🥰1
Iris師傅第(210)份好評 #抓龍筋 #根浴 骨友第三次搵完 Iris 師傅,大讚做完「細佬」硬度同持久度明顯提升,晨勃返晒嚟,連女朋友都讚勁咗,男人的自信心即刻返晒嚟!睡眠質素同精神都變好咗,最緊要有效。👍
❤1👍1🔥1🥰1
Iris師傅好評如潮(第209份) #抓龍筋 #氣內臟 【運動型男11/10好評】抓龍筋後強效去濕,小龍重拾年輕活力、有感變大,全身肌肉酸痛更一併消散!
❤2👍2
Iris師傅 #抓龍筋 第208份真實好評 💯 【晨勃、硬度、慾望大爆發!🔥】 骨友反映做完療程後呢兩日: 💬 「每早都有扯旗、同埋好想要、好硬」 👍。
❤3👍1🥰1
#Iris師傅好評如潮(第207份) #抓龍筋 #根骶前列腺 骨友覆診完三次後嘅分享: 1.夜尿情況有所改善。 2.睡眠質素變得更好咗。 3.晨勃都有明顯硬咗。 4.前列腺肥大嘅情況有所舒緩。 5.整體狀況改善十分明顯👍👍👍。
❤2👍1👏1💯1
#Iris師傅 第206份好評。 #抓龍筋 #氣內臟 骨友第一次抓完龍筋後就明顯感覺到「他」敏感了很多👍。
👍3❤2
#Iris師傅 第205份好評👍 #抓龍筋 #氣內臟 #根浴 骨友抓完龍筋後成個人身心變得神清氣爽,好像被重新開機一樣,連活力都明顯提升,晨勃的次數亦因此變得頻密,「小弟」變得更精神👏👍
👍3❤2
#Iris師傅 #抓龍筋 #氣內臟 又一好評(第204份好評)👏。 骨友抓完龍筋後第二日竟然有返久違的晨勃,之後幾日都keep住蠢蠢欲動,個人仲要精神咗瞓得好咗👍。
❤4👍1
#Iris師傅 #抓龍筋 #氣內臟 好評如潮(第203份好評)👏。 又一骨友主動分享抓完龍筋後嘅重大改善, "在未遇到iris師傅之前細路是軟綿綿的,對性都失去能力和興趣,現在早上經常會硬或無端端都硬,現在已經重拾性樂趣……掂“‼️
👍5❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Iris888816. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 117,695 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Iris抓龍筋固元保健好評” (@Iris888816), 169 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iris888816.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.