Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥1

Channel
@IrinaDryndina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
110subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001785675414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IrinaDryndina |
| Description | Пишу для психотерапевтов Инструменты для работы Человеческим языком о психоанализе Ирина Дрындина @irina_dryndina ▪️ психоаналитический психотерапевт, коуч ▪️ супервизор ▪️ спикер конференций |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IrinaDryndina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 110 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 22 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (22 December 2025 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 45 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
151 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 45.0% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 17.2% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 8.61% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 5.96% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.662% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IrinaDryndina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥1
Channel name was changed to «Мир глазами психотерапевта»
Готовлю доклад к конференции “Психоанализ цифровой культуры: субъект и искусственный интеллект”. Делюсь с вами идеями, как мы можем в терапии работать с вопросами ИИ. Так или иначе, пациенты приносят ИИ в терапию. У кого-то есть опыт решения психологических проблем с помощью ИИ. Как мы, как терапевты, могли бы исследовать взаимодействие человека с ИИ? Пока готовила синопсис доклада, перелопатила гору литературы на …
👍6🔥4❤1
Супервизионная группа для терапевтов в начале пути Открываю набор в супервизионную группу для тех, кто только входит в профессию: ✔️недавно завершили обучение ✔️начинаете вести первых клиентов или чувствуете, что на старте нужна более структурированная поддержка. Почему это важно В начале профессионального пути возникает много вопросов, которые выходят за рамки разбора отдельного клинического случая, и часто они …
❤18❤🔥2🔥1
Но без осознавания, что же он повторяет, такой пациент будет снова и снова наступать на те же грабли. 2. Невроз успеха Как бы фантастично это ни звучало, но часть пациентов обрекают себя на провал в бизнесе/карьере потому что не могут выдержать вину за свой успех. И тогда они делают какой-то промах/неверное решение в самый ответственный момент, что рушит всю так долго выстраиваемую лестницу к успеху. 3. Невроз пере…
❤10👍3🔥1
Сегодня читала доклад на международной научно-практической конференции в Екатеринбурге. Тема конференции «Предназначение: судьба или выбор». Мой доклад был о том, что может предложить психоанализ в работе с пациентами с запросом на поиск предназначения. Делюсь с вами сокращенной версией доклада. Найди свое призвание- неослабевающий тренд современности. Создается иллюзия, если я найду ответ на вопрос: в чем мое приз…
❤8👍3🔥1
Как написать классный доклад Три бессонные ночи в муках написать нормальный доклад сподвигли меня сесть и как-то структурировать процесс написания. Сегодня утром родился алгоритм, на который я опираюсь: 1. Иметь несколько тем, которые мне интересны, и в которых я хорошо разбираюсь 2. Посмотреть тему конференции. Как эта тема трогает меня лично? 3. Как она пересекается с моей практикой? 4. Связать 4 аспекта: тем…
👏13❤7👍7🔥1
А вы внедряете ИИ в свою жизнь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Приручение ИИ Уже примерно полгода я ищу способы внедрить ИИ-помощников в свою жизнь. От стадии очарования «щас быстренько скину на него всю нелюбимую работу» через стадию «черт, не получается, надо просто подучиться немного» я дошла до стадии «бестолковей исполнителя я еще не встречала». Затем отложила ИИ на пару месяцев и вот новый заход. Уже появилось понимание что: а) общение с ним можно настраивать (например,…
🔥5
https://yandex.ru/video/touch/preview/9101179652020218643
🔥5
Не знаю, сделал ли кто-то больше для развития женского предпринимательства, чем они (см видео в следующем сообщении). Для того, чтобы женщине зарабатывать деньги, не получать от мужчины, а именно зарабатывать, конвертировать свои знания-навыки-способности в деньги, не нужно уметь делать глубокое горло или сложносочиненное блюдо. И даже не нужно уметь управлять энергиями и как-то их там привлекать. Все, что нужно, з…
❤7🔥6
По следам обучения в школе супервизоров. Сегодня в школе разбирали случай работы с семьей, которая столкнулась с постановкой диагноза своему ребенку расстройство аутического спектра. К сожалению, а вернее, в силу изменения образа жизни (матери все меньше смотрят-в прямом смысле этого слова- на детей, а все чаще в экран гаджета или видят ребенка через камеру телефона, когда снимают его на утреннике), контакт глазами…
💯9❤5🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @IrinaDryndina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы внедряете ИИ в свою жизнь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир глазами психотерапевта” (@IrinaDryndina), 110 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IrinaDryndina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.