Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мир глазами психотерапевта

Channel

Мир глазами психотерапевта

@IrinaDryndina

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001785675414
TypeChannel
Username@IrinaDryndina
DescriptionПишу для психотерапевтов Инструменты для работы Человеческим языком о психоанализе Ирина Дрындина @irina_dryndina ▪️ психоаналитический психотерапевт, коуч ▪️ супервизор ▪️ спикер конференций
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/IrinaDryndina

Growth

1107 Aug 2026, 21:28 — 110 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 110 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:289 Aug 2026, 07:30
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:30110no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:28110first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.9%
avg views ÷ 110 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held15 (22 December 202527 July 2026)
Views total45
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Videos
2
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6845.0%
👍3120.5%
🔥2617.2%
👏138.61%
💯95.96%
❤‍🔥31.99%
🙏10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IrinaDryndina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @confpsychoanalysisPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1

1 Apr 2026, 11:41 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Мир глазами психотерапевта»

30 Mar 2026, 18:19 UTC273 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Готовлю доклад к конференции “Психоанализ цифровой культуры: субъект и искусственный интеллект”. Делюсь с вами идеями, как мы можем в терапии работать с вопросами ИИ. Так или иначе, пациенты приносят ИИ в терапию. У кого-то есть опыт решения психологических проблем с помощью ИИ. Как мы, как терапевты, могли бы исследовать взаимодействие человека с ИИ? Пока готовила синопсис доклада, перелопатила гору литературы на

👍6🔥41

25 Mar 2026, 21:11 UTC334 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Супервизионная группа для терапевтов в начале пути Открываю набор в супервизионную группу для тех, кто только входит в профессию: ✔️недавно завершили обучение ✔️начинаете вести первых клиентов или чувствуете, что на старте нужна более структурированная поддержка. Почему это важно В начале профессионального пути возникает много вопросов, которые выходят за рамки разбора отдельного клинического случая, и часто они

18❤‍🔥2🔥1

8 Feb 2026, 20:43 UTC352 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Но без осознавания, что же он повторяет, такой пациент будет снова и снова наступать на те же грабли. 2. Невроз успеха Как бы фантастично это ни звучало, но часть пациентов обрекают себя на провал в бизнесе/карьере потому что не могут выдержать вину за свой успех. И тогда они делают какой-то промах/неверное решение в самый ответственный момент, что рушит всю так долго выстраиваемую лестницу к успеху. 3. Невроз пере

10👍3🔥1

8 Feb 2026, 20:43 UTC250 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня читала доклад на международной научно-практической конференции в Екатеринбурге. Тема конференции «Предназначение: судьба или выбор». Мой доклад был о том, что может предложить психоанализ в работе с пациентами с запросом на поиск предназначения. Делюсь с вами сокращенной версией доклада. Найди свое призвание- неослабевающий тренд современности. Создается иллюзия, если я найду ответ на вопрос: в чем мое приз

8👍3🔥1

6 Feb 2026, 07:04 UTC210 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как написать классный доклад Три бессонные ночи в муках написать нормальный доклад сподвигли меня сесть и как-то структурировать процесс написания. Сегодня утром родился алгоритм, на который я опираюсь: 1. Иметь несколько тем, которые мне интересны, и в которых я хорошо разбираюсь 2. Посмотреть тему конференции. Как эта тема трогает меня лично? 3. Как она пересекается с моей практикой? 4. Связать 4 аспекта: тем

👏137👍7🔥1

28 Jan 2026, 20:44 UTC171 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

А вы внедряете ИИ в свою жизнь?

  1. Да, все нравится9%
  2. Да, но со скрипом55%
  3. Нет и не хочу9%
  4. Хочу, но не знаю как27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

28 Jan 2026, 20:31 UTC181 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Приручение ИИ Уже примерно полгода я ищу способы внедрить ИИ-помощников в свою жизнь. От стадии очарования «щас быстренько скину на него всю нелюбимую работу» через стадию «черт, не получается, надо просто подучиться немного» я дошла до стадии «бестолковей исполнителя я еще не встречала». Затем отложила ИИ на пару месяцев и вот новый заход. Уже появилось понимание что: а) общение с ним можно настраивать (например,

🔥5

27 Jan 2026, 10:34 UTC178 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://yandex.ru/video/touch/preview/9101179652020218643

🔥5

27 Jan 2026, 10:33 UTC186 views13 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026

Не знаю, сделал ли кто-то больше для развития женского предпринимательства, чем они (см видео в следующем сообщении). Для того, чтобы женщине зарабатывать деньги, не получать от мужчины, а именно зарабатывать, конвертировать свои знания-навыки-способности в деньги, не нужно уметь делать глубокое горло или сложносочиненное блюдо. И даже не нужно уметь управлять энергиями и как-то их там привлекать. Все, что нужно, з

7🔥6

26 Jan 2026, 18:42 UTC132 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

По следам обучения в школе супервизоров. Сегодня в школе разбирали случай работы с семьей, которая столкнулась с постановкой диагноза своему ребенку расстройство аутического спектра. К сожалению, а вернее, в силу изменения образа жизни (матери все меньше смотрят-в прямом смысле этого слова- на детей, а все чаще в экран гаджета или видят ребенка через камеру телефона, когда снимают его на утреннике), контакт глазами

💯95🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @IrinaDryndina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jan 2026, 20:44 UTCFinal Results11 voters

А вы внедряете ИИ в свою жизнь?

  1. Да, все нравится9%
  2. Да, но со скрипом55%
  3. Нет и не хочу9%
  4. Хочу, но не знаю как27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мир глазами психотерапевта” (@IrinaDryndina), 110 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IrinaDryndina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.