2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 703–705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 16:37
704
no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:04
704
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.5%
avg views ÷ 704 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held
20 (17 December 2025 – 15 July 2026)
Views total
264
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
119
Videos
44
Links
106
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
355 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
142
40.0%
👍
133
37.5%
👎
79
22.3%
🤔
1
0.282%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔸اصلاح؛ اسم رمز فساد
به روایت حجت میرزایی
در این نشست از جلسات اقتصاد سیاسی ایران که انجمن اقتصاد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی با همکاری بازاروما برگزار کرد، دکتر حجت میرزایی به اقتصاد سیاسی صندوق های بازنشستگی در ایران پرداخت و از دلایل و چرایی فساد در اقتصاد ایران گفت.
◾️این جلسه در تاریخ ۱۸ دیماه ۱۴۰۴ برگزار شده است.
تلگرام انجمن | اینستاگرام | لینکدین | ایران شکوفا
معرفی کتاب جدید پویش فکری توسعه
📘 در جستجوی مسیر توسعه
واکاوی چالشهای سیاستگذاری توسعه در ایران پس از انقلاب
از منظر سیاست مداران سابق و اندیشمندان توسعه
نویسنده: مرتضی درخشان و محمد حیدری
🔹 در آستانه قرن پانزدهم هجری شمسی، ایران با پرسشهایی روبهروست که دیگر نمیتوان برای پاسخ به آنها به منابع طبیعی، برنامههای رسمی یا حتی امیدهای تاریخی تکیه کرد. جامعهای که روزگاری گمان میکرد با داشتن نفت، نیروی انسانی تح…
📹 حجت میرزایی، اقتصاددان:
برآورد یک سازمان بین المللی نشان میدهد در اثر جنگ اخیر، کشورهای حوزه خلیج فارس بطور تجمیعی حدود ۳۵ سال پسرفت داشتهاند!
باتوجه به جنگ و محاصره دریایی که
از سر گذراندیم، حداقل ۵ سال زمان میبرد تا ما به سطح اقتصادی فروردین ۱۴۰۴ برسیم، تازه با رفع تحریمها
🔻ما فقط در شاخص توسعه انسانی، با برآوردهای چهار هفته اول جنگ بدون احتساب دوره محاصره دریایی، یک و نیم سال در توسعه انسانی عقب رفتیم.
#ا…
🎥 میرزایی، اقتصاددان: توافق و پایان محاصره، یک دستاورد بسیار بسیار بزرگ است
حجت میرزایی:
▪️توافق و پایان محاصره، یک دستاورد بسیار بسیار بزرگ است، اگر این اتفاق نمیافتاد شک نکنیم ما با یک فاجعه اقتصادی مواجه میشدیم
▪️برآوردی است که ما در تحریم ها دست کم ۱۲۰۰ میلیارد دلار از دست دادیم یعنی سه برابر جیدیپیمان
#اقتصاد_جنگ
#اقتصاد_ایران
#حجت_میرزایی
@IranianDevelopment
@tejaratnews
اقتصاد در سایه جنگ؛ فراتر از هیاهوی اخبار
ارائه دکتر حجت میرزایی از وضعیت و چشمانداز اقتصاد ایران
🔸 در روزهایی که اخبار جنگ، تحریم و تنشهای ژئوپلیتیکی لحظهبهلحظه تغییر میکنند، مهمترین پرسش این است که این تحولات چه اثری بر اقتصاد ایران خواهند گذاشت؟ آیا همه چیز به جنگ محدود میشود، یا ریشه مشکلات عمیقتر از یک بحران مقطعی است؟
🔸 دکتر حجت میرزایی عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، در ارائه خود در اتاق بازرگا…
📹 چرا تداوم تنشها میتواند آینده توسعه ایران را تهدید کند؟
▫️حجت اله میرزایی، مدیر سابق صندوق بازنشستگی کشور در همایش چشمانداز اقتصاد ایران 1405 که توسط گروه رسانهای دنیای اقتصاد برگزار شد به بررسی تبعات محاصره دریایی پرداخت.
▫️او توضیح میدهد که اگر بحران نظامی برای چند ماه دیگر ادامه یابد، اثرات توصیف شده گستردهتر، عمیقتر و سختتر برای معکوس کردن خواهند داشت.
▫️همچنین اختلال طولانی مدت در تجارت، تحرک، دارای…
🔰📌نخستین همایش مدیریت دولتی ایران: چالش ها و تدبیرها برگزار می کند
نهمین پیش نشست همایش با عنوان:
نقش دولت و خط مشی گذاری صنعتی
اساتید نشست:
*دکتر علی ملکی
*دکتر حجت اله میرزایی
*دکتر علی دینی ترکمانی
*دکتر مهدی صادقی شاهدانی
*دکتر علی اصغر سعیدی
*دکتر سید محمد رضا رضوی
رئیس پنل:
*دکتر سعید زرندی
دبیر پنل:
*جناب آقای سهراب رستمی کیا
*زمان برگزاری*
*سه شنبه ۱۹ خرداد ماه*
*ساعت ۱۶ تا ۱۸*
برگزاری نشست:
*حضوری و ب…
📹 پس از جنگ و آتشبس؛ چرا چشمانداز اقتصاد ایران تیرهتر شده است؟
▫️حجت اله میرزایی، مدیر سابق صندوق بازنشستگی کشور در همایش چشمانداز اقتصاد ایران 1405 که توسط گروه رسانهای دنیای اقتصاد برگزار شد به این مسئله اشاره کرد که قبل از وقوع جنگ 40 روزه، پیشبینی های نهادهای بینالمللی حاکی از آن بود که ما سال بسیار سختی را پیشرو خواهیم داشت.
▫️او توضیح میدهد که مسئله اول افزایش آمار جمعیت فقیر در ایران بود و مسئله بع…
📔اقتصاد ایران در سایه جنگ؛ از تئوری تا اقدام:
اقتصاد پساجنگ و خروج از چرخه فرسایش
سخنران:
#دکتر_حجت_میرزایی
دبیر نشست:
#فاطمه_السادات_نبوی
🗓یکشنبه 17خرداد 1405 ساعت 16
🔹پخش از لینک زیر(ورود با گزینه مهمان):
https://www.skyroom.online/ch/hossein5092811/economy
💢انجمن علمی دانشجویی توسعه اقتصادی و برنامه ریزی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی 💢
💢انجمن علمی دانشجویی اقتصاد دانشگاه شهید بهشتی 💢
💢رایحه اقتصاد 💢
💢خانه اندیشمندا…
نه به جنگ؛ پویش ملی دانشگاهیان ایرانی
به نام خداوند جان و خرد
«پویش ملی نه به جنگ» فراخوانی است از سوی جمعی از دانشگاهیان ایرانی در واکنش به فجایع خونبار دیماه سال جاری و نیز خطر فزاینده تحمیل جنگی ویرانگر علیه ایران.
۱. ما با اندوهی عمیق نسبت به جانباختن هزاران تن از عزیزان هموطن، تأکید میکنیم که روشنشدن ابعاد این کشتار هولناک از طریق تشکیل کمیتهای علمی، بیطرف و مورد وثوق افکار عمومی ضرورتی اجتنابناپذیر ا…
👎21👏14👍4🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IranianDevelopement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,035,570 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@IranianDevelopement named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@iraniandevelopment named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iranianht named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایران شکوفا” (@IranianDevelopement), 704 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IranianDevelopement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.