Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Об Иране с Ланой

Channel

Об Иране с Ланой

@Iran_with_Lana

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

475subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040208806
TypeChannel
Username@Iran_with_Lana
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Iran_with_Lana

Growth

475476475.56 August 2026 — 476 subscribers6 August 2026 — 476 subscribers13 August 2026 — 475 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 475–476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:35475-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:01476no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:18476first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 475 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (22 April 202623 July 2026)
Views total211
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

296 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13144.3%
🔥4515.2%
👍3511.8%
🥰3311.1%
👏248.11%
🙏165.41%
🤣41.35%
😁20.676%
💯10.338%
🕊10.338%
😍10.338%
😡10.338%
🤬10.338%
🤯10.338%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC104 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Делюсь выпуском программы «Дела зарубежные, или Каким мы видим мир» — итогового проекта «Перископ Авроры». Вместе с коллегами обсуждали ключевые международные события, Иран и ситуацию на Ближнем Востоке. Мое включение начинается примерно с 12-й минуты. Хотя выпуск вышел не сегодня, разговор не потерял актуальности — многие затронутые вопросы по-прежнему определяют развитие событий в регионе. Участники выпуска: Пав

5🔥3👏2

23 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC107 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @periscope_infoVideo

Дела зарубежные, или Каким мы видим мир Выпуск №39 еженедельной [суббота 19:00] итоговой программы «Перископ Авроры». Совместный проект ИА «Аврора» и аналитического альманаха «Перископ» ☆ Павел Орехов ☆ Ульяна Максименко ☆ Лана Раванди-Фадаи ☆ Артём Олоничев ☆ Дмитрий Евстафьев 💰 Оформить подписку

4👏4🥰3

16 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC180 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Делюсь своим комментарием для радио «Коммерсант FM». Почему вокруг меморандума о взаимопонимании так много противоречивых оценок? Это шаг к реальным договорённостям или всего лишь ещё одна попытка выиграть время? И главное — почему заявления сторон настолько расходятся, хотя речь идёт об одном и том же документе? Об этом — в эфире. #Иран #Лана

6🔥4🥰2

8 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC247 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Делюсь своим комментарием для радио «Коммерсант FM» по поводу ХАМАСа. В эфире появляюсь не сразу, но разговор, на мой взгляд, важный. Слушайте 👆 выше #Иран #Лана

6👏3🔥3

30 Jun 2026, 16:20 UTC489 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уже больше недели нахожусь в командировках, но работа продолжается. Сегодня давала интервью РБК. Один из главных вопросов был: почему США говорят, что переговоры с Ираном идут, а Тегеран это отрицает? Ответ, на мой взгляд, очень показателен. Для Вашингтона даже контакты через посредников — уже переговоры. А для Ирана это не переговоры с США, а технические консультации с посредниками по отдельным вопросам. В Тегеране

9👍4🔥3🥰2

13 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC327 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Давно ничего здесь не публиковала. Но за это время интервью и комментариев накопилось столько, что пора наконец начать ими делиться. Начну со вчерашнего разговора. Мы затронули действительно важную тему, которые сейчас обсуждают практически все, кто следит за ситуацией вокруг Ирана и Ближнего Востока. Делюсь интервью: https://caliber.az/post/ogranichennye-otvety-i-peregovory-novaya-taktika-vojny-na-blizhnem-vostoke-m

👍65🥰2👏1

2 Jun 2026, 10:02 UTC356 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня буду в эфире программы «Большая игра» с Дмитрием Саймсом на Первом канале. А пока делюсь предыдущим выпуском от 11 мая с Дмитрием Сусловым на 30:13 минуте: https://www.1tv.ru/shows/big-game/vypuski/bolshaya-igra-vypusk-ot-11-05-2026 Если честно, с тех пор в вопросе переговоров вокруг Ирана принципиально мало что изменилось. Заявлений по-прежнему много, а вот с реальными договорённостями всё гораздо сложнее…

6👍3🥰2🔥1

27 May 2026, 16:45 UTC378 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Делюсь своим интервью для Caliber.Az. Очень точное название: «Не мир, а передышка». Потому что сейчас главный вопрос уже не только в переговорах между США и Ираном, а в том, кто будет определять правила игры вокруг Ормузского пролива и всего региона в целом. И, честно говоря, пока в переговоры я не верю: https://caliber.az/post/ne-mir-a-peredyshka-ssha-i-iran-delyat-ormuz #Иран #Лана

🔥52🥰2

18 May 2026, 17:35 UTC371 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Хотя и с опозданием, эта передача, на мой взгляд, остаётся актуальной. Делюсь своим участием в программе «Большая игра» с Дмитрием Саймсом на Первом канале от 5 мая: https://www.1tv.ru/shows/big-game/vypuski/bolshaya-igra-chast-3-vypusk-ot-05-05-2026 #Иран #Лана

8🙏3👍2🥰2

17 May 2026, 08:00 UTC320 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

И снова прошу прощения, что на какое-то время выпала из Telegram — последние недели оказались чрезвычайно насыщенными работой. В воскресный день хочется немного отвлечься от политики. Сегодня предлагаю сделать небольшую паузу и поговорить об иранском футболе. Делюсь своим интервью об иранском футболе: https://www.sports.ru/football/blogs/3395203.html #Иран #Лана #Футбол

8🥰3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Iran_with_Lana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,257,748 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Об Иране с Ланой” (@Iran_with_Lana), 475 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iran_with_Lana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.