Channel
@Iqtisodchi_Asadbek
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002073968369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Iqtisodchi_Asadbek |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Iqtisodchi_Asadbek |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 37 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 38 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 39 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 39 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 60 | 57.1% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 15.2% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 14.3% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5215331182115300903 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.952% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2024 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bu 18 yoshli futbolchini gapirgan bu gaplarini butun oʻzbek futbolchilari yigʻilib ham gapirolmasa kerak. Bu gaplar kimdir uchun shunchaki gapdir lekin anglagan inson uchun xaqiqy inson, xaqiqy sportchini gapi.
❤2👎1
"Biz bor kuchimizni berdik, ammo bu etarli bo'lmadi. Bu yo'lning bir qismi xolos - yuqoriga chiqish uchun ko'tarilish kerak. Biz bu oson bo'lmasligini va hech kim ishimizni engillashtirmasligini bilamiz. Ammo taslim bo'lish - biz uchun variant emas. Bizda ruhlanish uchun sabablar etarli va nima bo'lishidan qati nazar, o'z maqsadimiz sari boramiz. Har bir xato - bu dars, shubha qilmangki, biz ularning har biridan to'…
❤2
Koʻp narsani bilmiman lekin bu aniq: Oʻzini oʻzi boshqara olmaydiganlar boshqariladi.... Oʻz hohishi bilan mehnat qimaydiganlar kimdir uchun mehnat qiladi...
❤2
Kimnidir orzuyidagi inson boʻlish uchun, uni orzu qilish emas, oʻz orzularing bilan yashashing kerak!
Sen xaqingda oʻzingdan va oʻzidan koʻp qaygʻuradigan inson faqat ota onang!
👍2❤1
#qizil_bayroq #tilanchi Hozir shuncha ijtimoiy tarmoqdagi va oʻzim suhbat qurib koʻrgan koʻpchilik "qizil bayroq" qizlarni koʻrib ularni haqiqiy loʻli (tilanchi) ga oʻxshatyapman Loʻli manga faqat ber, ber deydi evaziga 2 ogʻiz duosini beradi. Hudo biladi u duosi oʻtadimi yoʻqmi Qizlar ham menga hamma narsa qilib berishing kerak deb loʻlilik qiladi evaziga esa toʻshakda beradigan rohatini aytadi, menday qiz seni y…
👍4custom 52153311821153009034❤3👎3😁2
Pulga sotib olinadigan har qanday narsa qadirga ega emas!
👍3👎1
#ota_ona - cheksiz mehr... Hechqaysi mativatorning gapi hatto u millarder boʻlsa ham, ota-onamchalik menga kuch berolmaydi! Meni qiynaydigan tomoni ertaga ular yoʻq boʻlishsa, ulardan boshqa kim bilan bunday samimy va ruxlantiruvchi suhbat quraman?! Bu dunyo rohatlanishga emas sinov uchun berilganini yana bir isboti...
👍5
CHatGPT zamonaviy insonlarning eng katta muammosi nima? ChatGPT: Zamonaviy insonlarning eng katta muammolaridan biri — ruhiy bosim va stress. Tezkor hayot tarzi, texnologiyaning jadal rivojlanishi, doimiy raqobat va ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi mukammallikka intilish ko‘plab insonlarni ruhiy charchoqqa olib kelmoqda. Bundan tashqari: • Vaqt yetishmovchiligi – Ish, o‘qish va shaxsiy hayot o‘rtasida muvozanat topish qiy…
👍3
#Qizim Qizim sanga ona boʻlishga loyigʻini qidryapman, shu uchun chiroyini emas farosatini ustun qoʻydim! Topaman InshaAlloh ( lekin qiyin boʻlyapti ) @Iqtisodchi_Asadbek
👍2❤1
Bular quydagilarni isbotladi.. Messi: ming xarakat qilsang ham ayrim qirralarda iqtidorni yengolmaysan. Yamal: Bu dunyoda doim zoʻrdan zoʻri chiqadi. Neymar: Oliftalik bilan natijaga erishib boʻlmaydi. Ronaldo: Futbol qiroli boʻlolmasa ham futbolda matonat qiroli bu yaqqol Ronaldo. @Iqtisodchi_Asadbek
❤2👍2🔥1
#Instagram Men oʻzi zoʻrgʻa boʻydoqlik davrida oʻzimni nomahram qizdan tiyib yursam bu instagramda buncha koʻp chiroyli qizlar chiqaveradi eng yomoni ochiq va qomatini koʻrsatib kiyngan! Oʻzi shunaqaligini bilganim uchun 21 yoshimgacha instagram ochmay yurgandim, endi esa shaxsiy ishmni instagramda ham yoʻlga qoʻyish uchun ochdim. Aytishingiz mumkin shunaqa video kop koʻrganinga chiqadi deb lekin 90% videolarda to…
👍10❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Iqtisodchi_Asadbek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Asadbek ( Iqtisodchi )” (@Iqtisodchi_Asadbek), 37 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iqtisodchi_Asadbek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.