Channel
@IqraOnline
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
770subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001077621408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IqraOnline |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IqraOnline |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 770 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 767 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 767 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,401 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
70 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 55.7% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 12.9% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.71% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As we come close to the signing of yet another MoU, here's a video I took on Qeshm Island in 2021, which shows how the history of colonial powers in this region runs more than 200 years deep and why full Iranian control over the Strait matters. It is a replica of a hut Iranian fishermen and traders once used to sell fish and shrimp secretly, on their own land, avoiding being caught by the British, at a time when Bri…
🔥4❤1
(5) In the Company of the Imams | Sayyid Ali Imran https://youtu.be/bAtcyJMdU2A A money-changer known to his opponents as Shaytan al-Taq and to his friends as Mu'min al-Taq, his sharp eye for counterfeit coins became, under the guidance of the Imams, a sharp mind for detecting counterfeit arguments. This lecture follows his growth into one of the four companions Imam al-Sadiq (as) called "the most beloved of people…
❤2
(4) In the Company of the Imams | Sayyid Ali Imran https://youtu.be/LuQ-Y3v7i7s A merchant of cloth who arrived as a sharp debater and became the man who systematized Shi'i theology itself. This lecture follows Hisham ibn al-Hakam's conversion, his rise to become "our supporter with heart, tongue, and hand" while still a youth, and his growth into one of the leading theological minds of his generation. We also disc…
❤3
(3) In the Company of the Imams | Sayyid Ali Imran https://youtu.be/hIUsqzIGYLI Not every companion of the Imams was a fiery debater — some built their legacy through quiet, patient consistency instead. Muhammad ibn Muslim spent four uninterrupted years in Madinah with Imam al-Baqir (as), asking question after question, before returning home to Kufa — where he never abandoned his own trade, and later kept travellin…
❤3🔥3
(2) In the Company of the Imams | Sayyid Ali Imran https://youtu.be/-nr5X7H_v_w Zurarah ibn A'yan didn't start out as a scholar; rather, he started out as a passionate and sharp-tongued youth. This lecture traces his remarkable journey: from heated debates and theological missteps with Imam al-Baqir (as), to a slow, patient transformation into the man Imam al-Sadiq (as) would trust to represent the entire school of…
❤2
(1) In the Company of the Imams | Sayyid Ali Imran After Karbala, the Shi'a community was left scattered and adrift, without even the basic knowledge of their own Hajj, halal, or haram. This first lecture in our Arba'een series traces how Imam al-Baqir and Imam al-Sadiq (as) rebuilt that community almost from nothing: who the earliest companions were, the hidden rooms, mosque corners, and long nights where the Imams…
❤2👍1
Becoming Muslim II: Crafting Our Story in the West Full Seminar: https://youtu.be/fuAy8sKe-y8?si=Non_eZibg-dnGsde In this 4 hour course, we ask a deeper civilizational question: once we know what truly defines religious identity, what story should Muslims in the West live by? In a time when dominant modern narratives are losing their moral clarity, Muslims in the West have an opportunity to recover and present a s…
❤2🔥2👍1
4 hour seminar video coming soon... Video will be accessible through the members portal: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_3z_R-TxdSLNIIXE-NADvQ/join
🔥5❤3
Hadith Files (5): "We Don't Know if Shrimp is a Fish" Full Video: https://youtu.be/mAzS8I4rNSc In this episode of The Hadith Files, we visit some narrations on Rabīthā and Irbiyān (shrimp) by reading them as a historical conversation rather than as isolated reports. Instead of beginning with later legal conclusions, we arrange the narrations in a plausible chronological sequence, revealing an intriguing progression…
❤2
3 Days Left! Becoming Muslim II: Crafting Our Story in the West In this 4 hour course, we ask a deeper civilizational question: once we know what truly defines religious identity, what story should Muslims in the West live by? In a time when dominant modern narratives are losing their moral clarity, Muslims in the West have an opportunity to recover and present a story rooted in God, ethics, knowledge, and institu…
👍1
Book Club Session #2 | This Dark Age Watch Here: https://youtu.be/ajUgomjaZCM In this second session of our Summer Intensive Book Club, we continue our study of This Dark Age by Daniel Schwindt, examining the philosophical foundations of the modern world through a traditionalist lens. Our discussion explores America as the clearest expression of modernity and critically examines the ideas of liberalism, liberty, ri…
❤2
Hadith Files (4): Allah Has Placed No Cure in Alcohol https://youtu.be/2zDR2UjkeJE?si=kF91n9b1OfgDApgn In this episode of The Hadith Files, we examine the well-known narrations stating that "Allah has not placed any cure in alcohol" and "Allah has not placed healing in that which He has made unlawful." Rather than focusing solely on the chains of transmission, we explore how Shi'a jurists understood these reports i…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IqraOnline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Iqra Online” (@IqraOnline), 770 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IqraOnline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.