Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

H A S H 𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 ⌗𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐨 |dkm

@InvolveToDarknet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003834900380
TypeChannel
Username@InvolveToDarknet
Descriptionвлд: @ne_esskeetit fan? -> #𝓗𝓈 архив: @InvolveToDarknetarchive инфо: @angelgayy @InvolveToDarknet https://t.me/boost/InvolveToDarknet
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/InvolveToDarknet

Growth

1427 Aug 2026, 18:29 — 142 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 22:00 — 142 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:298 Aug 2026, 22:00
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:00142no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:29142first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
220.6%
avg views ÷ 142 subscribers
Avg views / post
313
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,072
Reactions total249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

339 reactions across 6 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54273999168193502383510.3%
custom 5314401710968437243267.67%
custom 5429512125900950993236.78%
custom 5427346057929459523226.49%
custom 5314580952838597379205.90%
custom 5474242341978018907205.90%
custom 5314488782840429177185.31%
custom 5429353345254985227185.31%
custom 5317032193753640389133.83%
custom 5314786286635084806113.24%
custom 5427192710417123896113.24%
custom 5210729378060726165102.95%
custom 5429274712993727280102.95%
custom 531470710032304984292.65%
custom 531474864124673492392.65%
custom 531434854786324572082.36%
custom 521096830279643615172.06%
custom 542707308698799509472.06%
custom 546085073273331550761.77%
custom 542696979302452631951.47%
21 further kinds5115.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @InvolveToDarknet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC195 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 531478628663508480611custom 53143485478632457208custom 54608507327333155076custom 54741500345408935304custom 53550787062787185142custom 53166226213773267531custom 53255250320199784161

4 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC89 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhanym666MCPhoto

Your death #L O V E «new woman» 🌟@PORTfolio 🎀 your Girlfriend $ 🥰 #practice #artwork 🤩 ART FOR @InvolveToDarknet 🤩BOOST INFO ORDER ME🤩

29 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC387 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ORDER 🤩 time: 1h25m price: 100₽ * hash portfolio It was weird, but suddenly only for a moment ___ me price boost

custom 531440171096843724326custom 531448878284042917718custom 531703219375364038913custom 54338933361402553923custom 53147309202116765982custom 53169582558916428301

21 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC505 views101 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩𝐇𝐀𝐒𝐇 𝐏𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐅𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐎: bunker ᵍʳᵃᵖʰᶦᶜ ᵈᵉˢᶦᵍⁿ ˢᵉʳᵛᶦᶜᵉˢ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 🤩link 🤩 avatars 🤩 banners 🤩 posters + e.t.c. ➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨 🤩link ➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐬 🤩link🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐯𝐞 🤩 link ➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 🤩 me cr ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ORDERS OPEN 🤩

custom 542739991681935023833custom 542951212590095099323custom 542734605792945952322custom 54269697930245263195custom 54291642850895813625custom 54293793856417003875custom 54293780670867375414custom 54294859824350170694

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @InvolveToDarknet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 426,619 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“H A S H 𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 ⌗𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐨 |dkm” (@InvolveToDarknet), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InvolveToDarknet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.