Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Invited by MarTON

@InvitedByMarTON

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

518subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002673900004
TypeChannel
Username@InvitedByMarTON
DescriptionTON and crypto insights by the head of Growth at TON FOUNDATION
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/InvitedByMarTON

Growth

517518517.56 Aug 2026, 00:48 — 517 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:10 — 518 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:32 — 518 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 00:486 Aug 2026, 18:32
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 517–518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:32518no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:10518+1
6 Aug 2026, 00:48517first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
48
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6852.3%
custom 52242907201179621864333.1%
custom 54291894364180475071914.6%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 13 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @InvitedByMarTON. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 December 2025 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2026, 10:57 UTC627 views10 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Glenn Brown VP BD of TON FOUNDATION, live on stage in 30 mins (13:30 CET) WATCH HERE https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1qGvvkWDRQOGB?t=W1h_NmQ41lIoLkSl2bMb0A&s=09

custom 522429072011796218610

30 Jan 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,250 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Anyone want to see a live stream at WSB in Miami?

custom 542918943641804750713🔥5

28 Jan 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,160 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

Memes, crypto food and Rekt drinks One of the biggest crypto artists out there and we naturally talk about TON OSF is very bullish https://youtu.be/KnPhB3d2R8c

custom 52242907201179621868

22 Jan 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,110 views14 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Is the CEO of Animoca a cake man? Off Script episode 2 has just dropped and it's a must watch! Are you a pasta fan...won't lie it was amazing, not a drop was wasted there, 2 clean plates! https://youtu.be/1T7I0MnzYVY

🔥8custom 52242907201179621866

8 Jan 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,280 views26 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

So I've been cleaning the floors at TF HQ for extra pocket money. The good news is, that I'm donating that money back to you guys by paying for half your ticket to Wallstreetbets live conference in Miami 🇺🇸, January 28-30. This is one of the most hyped conferences and might be a few other surprises. Might even do a little drinks and 🍰 event for you guys who come!

custom 522429072011796218616🔥5custom 54291894364180475075

1 Jan 2026, 17:51 UTC979 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Wow, over 13,000 voted in the open awards Swap coffee, Mr Freeman, Elephant Store, TON KEEPER and so many more winners 🥳 Winners of the “Best TON influencer” category: 1st place: @groza Winner! 2nd place: @DictatorCryptoDCT 3rd place: @toncryptans For results The Open Awards

🔥8custom 52242907201179621863custom 54291894364180475071

25 Dec 2025, 21:13 UTC764 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Community alert: A number of Trust Wallet users have reported that funds were drained from wallet addresses within the past couple of hours. While the exact root cause has not been determined coincidentally the Trust Wallet Chrome extension pushed a new update yesterday. Send me a DM on X (Twitter) if you were affected and I will update the list of theft addresses below as I verify more. Theft addresses EVM 0x3b0

🔥2

25 Dec 2025, 21:13 UTC724 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Update: Hundreds of Trust Wallet victims & $6M+ stolen from the intial list of theft addresses

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @InvitedByMarTON. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 773,751 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Invited by MarTON” (@InvitedByMarTON), 518 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InvitedByMarTON.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.