Channel
@IntuitiveStory
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001163873888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IntuitiveStory |
| Created | 6 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IntuitiveStory |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @IntuitiveStory/720 · this entry8 Aug 2025, 19:07 UTC | @IntuitiveNarrative/1588 Aug 2025, 19:08 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @IntuitiveNarrative/15917 Aug 2025, 21:05 UTC | @IntuitiveStory/721 · this entry17 Aug 2025, 21:05 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @IntuitiveStory/722 · this entry18 Sept 2025, 03:12 UTC | @IntuitiveNarrative/16218 Sept 2025, 03:13 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @IntuitiveNarrative/16322 Sept 2025, 01:34 UTC | @IntuitiveStory/723 · this entry22 Sept 2025, 01:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @IntuitiveNarrative | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | even |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 January 2025 to 1 April 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @IntuitiveNarrative. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 6 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 6 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"A twinge of fear rose in his mind, but like a practice reflex, something like a wave of faith rolled over it and smothered it. He slept, peacefully." — Saraswati's Intelligence by Vamsee Juluri, p120 t.me/IntuitiveBreath/54 t.me/BreatheBeing/64
Demi writes, "I'm a Warlock, Bard rising, with a moon in Druid, and my Venus is a FIGHTER, not a lover. 🤣🤣🤣" facebook.com/share/1CW7jja3im more: t.me/StarfireCodes Reshared with love & appreciation by Intuitive Community Media Network groups coordinating t.me/StarClock/284 & t.me/ComediaIntuitiva/108
"We’re fighting a war for the future of our world. This shouldn’t be a competition. Logic and wisdom dictate that you assist us so you don’t become us." — Onyx Storm by Rebecca Yarros t.me/IntuitiveNarrative/163 t.me/IntuitiveStory/723
"And yet…if all of it hadn’t happened, would we still be us? Or is the miracle of our relationship the result of a precise combination of tragedies that broke us both so completely that when we collided, we became something entirely new?" — Onyx Storm by Rebecca Yarros t.me/IntuitiveNarrative/162 t.me/IntuitiveStory/722
"You defended the smallest with ferocity. And strength of courage is more important than physical strength." — Fourth Wing by Rebecca Yarros t.me/IntuitiveNarrative/159 t.me/IntuitiveStory/721
"You honor the dead by making sure no others fall in the same manner. We have to learn from this." — Onyx Storm by Rebecca Yarros t.me/IntuitiveNarrative/158 t.me/IntuitiveStory/720
Ninga Odé shared, ' What is the name of the land you are standing on? What is it in her familiar tongue? Who are the people who belong to her? Where are those people now? How were they moved, killed, eliminated for you to be there today? You. Not your ancestors. You. How many of their elders are living? How many youth? How many language holders? What is the language that they speak? What have you done in defense of …
🙏1
I've wanted to make this broadcast for a long time. And I finally got to do it. Profound gratitude to our Intuitive Network groups coordinating @IntuitiveSocialHorror, @IntuitiveStory, @DeepTheShadowbag, @Ideaschema, the @IntuitivePublicRadio, and many other interlocking @IntuitiveCommunity platforms that make this collaborative progress possible. And thank you Brie-Anna and t.me/BusinessForNerds for the awesome cr…
“What is such a hell realm — when it is transmuted by our intention, and courage… and maybe nothing else but our existence? That spark of vital life force energy that meets the challenge.” — 11 minutes and 20 seconds of Intuitive Horror Lab broadcast audio by Megan Elizabeth on 22 June 2025 www.intuitivepublicradio.network/p/storytime-radio-with-intuitive-story-and-intuitive-social-horror 🎶✨🌚🌟
Brie-Anna Willey is building a great immersion art and business community resource space in Business for Nerds (her Nerdiverse!) on Discord. (See also: t.me/BusinessForNerds on Telegram.) And since she opened up a channel specifically to energize our Intuitive Network groups’ collaborative Intuitive Social Horror project — the Intuitive Horror Lab — I've gotten to weave some especially excellent neurological repair…
250622-202613 Intuitive Social Horror • Storytime Radio Snapshots • Intuitive Public Radio • IPR ••• Transcript: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pQZiE27EvH-QwAtTUXXf0wUPAaxHRwMeSoIIA77vjT0 t.me/IntuitiveSocialHorror/2688 • t.me/IntuitiveStory/713 • t.me/IntuitivePublicRadio/12825
Uh oh. I hear birds singing. No more coffee. Ever. t.me/MaxMoRadio/6984
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IntuitiveStory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔊 @IntuitiveStory • Story & Spontaneous Cosmology • Intuitive Public Radio • IPR •••” (@IntuitiveStory), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IntuitiveStory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.