Channel
@InterLinkOG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
979subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002392105661 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @InterLinkOG |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/InterLinkOG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 979 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 979 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 341 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🚀 FROM HUMAN NETWORK TO WALL STREET — COULD $ITL ONE DAY REACH THE NYSE? Let’s be real for a moment. When people hear InterLink, many immediately think about crypto mining, Human Nodes, or another Web3 project. But what if the bigger story is actually much broader? 👀 InterLink is building around a simple but powerful idea: 👉 REAL HUMANS + DIGITAL IDENTITY + BLOCKCHAIN + PAYMENTS + REAL-WORLD ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. That c…
ITL isn't for giveaways. It's a strategic asset managed with capital discipline. This mindset separates sustainable ecosystems from pump-and-dump cycles. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
ITL acquired via Reverse Auction may be permanently burned. Every repurchase is a potential reduction in circulating supply—deflationary discipline in action. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
Reverse Auction is 100% voluntary. You choose your price. You choose your amount. No coercion. No forced selling. Pure market-driven treasury strategy. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
Spending real treasury capital to acquire ITL is the strongest signal of long-term confidence. Actions speak louder than whitepapers. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
Every ITL use requires strict governance, multiple approval layers, and treasury discipline. This isn't speculation—it's institutional-grade asset management. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
Organizations should compete by creating value, not by lobbying for allocations. The best builders earn the right to hold ITL. Meritocracy over bureaucracy. #InterLink #ITLG #ITL
Building for the Future The future of a blockchain ecosystem depends on factors beyond technology alone. Sustainable treasury management and thoughtful token economics are of equal importance. InterLink's Reverse Auction strategy may offer a novel approach for InterLink Labs to manage $ITL treasury resources while engaging directly in the market. Rather than relying on additional allocations, the treasury could pote…
🌍 InterLink's Long-Term Principles: Building Value, Not Dependency The future of InterLink should not be established upon endless token distribution. It must be founded on genuine value creation, sustainable economic frameworks, and enduring independence. From its inception, InterLink has maintained a clear strategic direction: 🔹 No presale, ICO, IDO, or private token sales. 🔹 Community reward programs are primari…
How is $LMP Created? What if a Business Token could be connected to actual commerce, real transactions, and genuine ecosystem activity? Introducing $LMP — the official Business Token powering the @LinkersMap ecosystem. Built as an IRC-20 Business Token on InterLink Chain, $LMP has a fixed total supply of 100,000,000 $LMP. The core mechanism involves connecting $LMP with business activity. REAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY …
✅ITL Token Repurchase and Long-Term Supply Management! ➔One potential application of tokens repurchased through ITL's Reverse Auction is permanent burning. ➔Upon burning, tokens are permanently removed from circulation. ➔ However, burning is not the sole option. ➔Future governance decisions may allocate repurchased ITL tokens to: - Ambassadors - Builders - Developers - Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) - Community Contrib…
✅Why is an independent Treasury Significant? A robust ecosystem is not constructed Solely Through External funding. ➔ A healthy ecosystem necessitates accountability, financial autonomy, and the creation of tangible value. When an organization maintains an independent treasury, the following benefits are realized: income and resources can be managed autonomously; decisions regarding expenditure can be optimized; …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @InterLinkOG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 81,832 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@InterLinkOG named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Éŝû | InterLinklabs 🌐” (@InterLinkOG), 979 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InterLinkOG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.