project made $100,000 in revenue in 1 year

Channel
IntelSec
@IntelligenceSec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
655subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001943205219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IntelligenceSec |
| Created | 29 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IntelligenceSec |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 655 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 661 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 665 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 665 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 53s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
selling project channel for 6k with old source + bot without keys, previously sold source for 20k with keys @hgfdskgfg
Everything going back to normal, use @intelsec_bot and intelsec.mysellix.io if you want to purchase intelsec (repost) - @Lonely
IntelSec pinned «$500 Crypto Giveaway Giveaway conditions: • Must be inside @intelligencesec Number of Participants: 812 To participate in the giveaway, press the button below!»
$500 Crypto Giveaway Giveaway conditions: • Must be inside @intelligencesec Number of Participants: 812 To participate in the giveaway, press the button below!
Hello, IntelSec is now up. We're working on fixing our MS module, IntelX credits are drained for the day, sorry. Usernames won’t work on LC for a bit too. DM @Lonely for your plan back, adding five days to each person when i’m not busy
DM me, @Lonely
Hey! Looking for a developer experienced with python & golang :P If you're wondering why there's been so much down time lately, we've been experimenting with migration, we'll add however many days we’re online to everyone's monthly plans when the bot is up (~3 days)
Started working on the site a few hours ago, started from scratch, should be done in a few weeks.
Hey there Intelsec buyers! We've fixed the Gmail module so you can use it without problems. We're working on fixing the LinkedIn module and will keep you posted. As a thank you for bearing with us, we're adding an extra week to every monthly plan. Thanks for your continued support! Gmail ✅ LinkedIn ❌ (Soon)
PM @Lonely or visit https://intelsec.mysellix.io to buy.
Exciting news! We are introducing IntelX to our service, marking a significant leap forward in IntelSec. We want to ensure you are fully prepared for this game-changing advancement. Please keep in mind that IntelX will be exclusively available in our lifetime plan and will not be included in the monthly subscription.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @IntelligenceSec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 923,206 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@IntelligenceSec named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IntelSec” (@IntelligenceSec), 655 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IntelligenceSec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.