Channel
@IngushianHistori
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
84subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002693855333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IngushianHistori |
| Created | Between 1 April 2025 and 29 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IngushianHistori |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 84 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 86 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 84 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 85 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 85 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 29 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5215544478781169786 | 14 | 40.0% | |
| custom 5197371952460764368 | 10 | 28.6% | |
| custom 5197157886995753353 | 6 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5197380860222923296 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| custom 5197579863237617936 | 2 | 5.71% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Показания Сергея Шойгу о геноциде ингушей осенью 1992 года 13 августа 2024 от Ингушский проект "Народная история" "Необходимо указать, что все эти акции в отношении подразделений российской армии во Владикавказе совершались осетинским населением. Сведений о том, что со стороны ингушей предпринимались подобные действия, у меня нет. Ингушей к тому времени, по-моему, вообще не было во Владикавказе, они покинули этот го…
После того как я разобрался, что происходит в Осетии, решил узнать, что происходит на той стороне – в Назрани. Информация о происходящем там поступала, но кое-что вызывало у меня сомнения в ее объективности, и поэтому я решил сам съездить в Назрань и своими глазами увидеть, что там происходит. В ночь с 3-4 ноября, еще до того, как в зону конфликта были введены войска, я на автомашине «Волга» с двумя ребятами, которых…
Вообще они довольно постоянно курсировали там между Южной и Северной Осетией. Впервые во время конфликта я их увидел, когда они устроили стрельбу из автоматов в центре Владикавказа, перепились и устроили триумф со стрельбой после победы над ингушами. Вообще в Южной Осетии они доставили нам хлопот. Когда мы вошли в Южную Осетию, то первое, что я потребовал, чтобы их разоружили. Оружия, военной техники у них было много…
Photo, posted without a caption
Ингуши являясь самым разбойничьим племенем на Северном Кавказе, наводят страх на всю Терскую область. Храбрые и дерзкие до необычайности, они делают нападения среди белого дня не только на проезжих в поле, но даже на магазины в центральной части г. Владикавказа организованными бандами, причем по совершении ограбления или убийства умеют исчезать с поразительной быстротой. В ночную пору в городе, не говоря уже об окрес…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
БИОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ. Аланский генетический след в генофонде Вайнахов.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Video, posted without a caption
Детский ансамбль «Зори Ингушетии» во время визита в Рим, Италия, в 2000-х годах. В сопровождении ингушской делегации во главе с бывшим президентом М. Зязиковым.
Мой чат https://t.me/caucasians_chat
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @IngushianHistori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@IngushianHistori named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гlалгlай Тархьар” (@IngushianHistori), 84 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IngushianHistori.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.