Channel
@InformaticaCGT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
505subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001011792121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @InformaticaCGT |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/InformaticaCGT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 505 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 504 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 505 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 505 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 April 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 161 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Bienvenida a las personas readmitidas a Global Rosetta 🤗 Este lunes se llevaron a cabo las reincorporaciones de las personas afectadas por el despido colectivo, tal y como indicaba la sentencia del juicio de la demanda interpuesta por CGT y ELA. Queremos daros la bienvenida a todas y todos y esperamos que la empresa se haga cargo de daros un proyecto acorde a vuestro perfil, proporcionando la correspondiente formac…
La presencia de CGT en la negociación del Plan de Igualdad sigue demostrando que su acción sindical sirve para conseguir mejoras reales y concretas para la plantilla. Gracias a las propuestas y a la defensa mantenida por CGT durante la negociación, a partir del 16 de julio, las personas trabajadoras que se acojan a la modalidad Flex Choice podrán decidir si desean disfrutar o no de los festivos de empresa, en las mi…
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️¡¡ATENCIÓN!!⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ El ERE en Global Rosetta es NULO La Audiencia Nacional nos da la razón y declara nulos todos los despidos realizados y tiene que readmitir a todas las personas trabajadoras que fueron despedidas https://globalrosettacgt.blogspot.com/2026/07/comunicado-cgt-el-despido-colectivo-es.html
A LA HUELGA — Lunes 22 de junio, 11:30 h Este lunes salimos a la calle. Huelga y concentración por una compensación justa, por un convenio justo y por una mesa de negociación. Nos concentramos en: - Bilbao — Gran Vía 12 - Madrid — Paseo de Recoletos 10 - Barcelona — Antoni Maura 6 Acude, trae a tus compañeras y compañeros y haz correr la voz. Cuantas más seamos, más fuerza haremos. https://x.com/CGTenBBVATech/sta…
📵 CHARLA / TALLER “Desconexión digital: un derecho a conquistar” Vivimos conectadas permanentemente. El trabajo invade nuestro tiempo, el móvil elimina fronteras y la disponibilidad constante se convierte en una obligación no escrita. Desde CGT Metal Madrid abrimos un espacio para reflexionar y debatir sobre el derecho a la desconexión digital, sus implicaciones en la salud laboral y cómo organizarnos para defender…
BBVA Tech 📢 CCOO aplaza, CGT moviliza ✊ CCOO ha movido la huelga estatal del 8 al 22 de junio. ¿El motivo? La visita del Papa. Mientras unos buscan la fecha perfecta para la foto, la pérdida de poder adquisitivo no espera. Nosotras tampoco. Concentración: "Sus millones, nuestras lamentaciones. Techies en lucha." 📅 Jueves 18 de junio 🕑 14:00 h — descanso de la comida, fuera de horario laboral 📍 Gran Vía 12, Bilbao …
Compañeras, compañeros: Hemos leído la nota de la RLPT explicando por qué se ha movido la huelga del 8J. Se agradece el tono conciliador, pero hablemos claro: la transparencia llega tarde y, sobre todo, llega después de haber decidido por toda la plantilla. En esa nota se confiesan tres cosas, y las tres retratan a quien las firma. https://cgtinformatica.org/es/contenido/comunicado-cgt-bbva-technology-la-dignidad-no-…
CCoo BBVA Technology ya NO va a la huelga porque #ElPapaEnMadrid https://t.me/cgtenbbvatech
El próximo 14 de junio manifestación en Madrid contra el rearme, la guerra y el militarismo. A las 12 horas en Atocha para ir al Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores.
Firmado ERE en Capgemini. Tal y como hemos dicho desde el principio, este proceso estaba decidido de antemano y pensamos que además de lo grave que siempre resulta el despido forzoso de tantos compañeros, ha sido también muy preocupante cómo se ha gestionado y quién lo ha avalado. https://capgeminitas.blogspot.com/2026/05/ere-capgemini-nuestra-vision-del-proceso.html
Más de 700 personas despedidas en Capgemini y todo sigue como si nada. No hay asambleas, no hay oposición visible, no hay movilizaciones previstas. Se intenta imponer la normalidad, quieren que lo asumamos como algo lógico, inevitable y quieren que pensemos que no nos va a tocar. https://capgeminitas.blogspot.com/2026/05/mas-de-700-despidos-y-aqui-no-pasa-nada.html
Como recordaréis, una demanda de la CGT en Zara abrió el camino del reconocimiento para que cuando un festivo coincidiera en un descanso semanal en trabajo a turnos, pudiera disfrutarse otro día. Necesitábamos un precedente para el caso más habitual, es decir, cuando un festivo coincidiera en sábado para trabajadores/as con jornada laboral de lunes a viernes (o lunes a sábado con descanso esa semana en sábado). Pue…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @InformaticaCGT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,588,180 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“InformaticaCGT” (@InformaticaCGT), 505 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InformaticaCGT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.