β οΈUPDATE SCAMMER β οΈ Awal kontrak aman , Setelah PPJ dan nambah kontrak channel kami kena SCAM. NDP GRUP PST tidak d kerjain sama sekali & CHANNEL DIGIMON nya hanya d kerjain 20 NDP (JAUH DARI AWAL KESEPAKATAN KONTRAK) GRUP & CHANNEL di ganti nama , akses admin di unadmin , di channel di kick ! katanya ORANG LAMA , tau nya scam jg ! POSTINGAN DAPAT DIPERTANGGUNG JAWAB KAN 100% !! hati" untuk para marketing , dia β¦

Channel
ππππππππ¦π§ π¦πππ π ππ₯
@Infomarsiscamer
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
84subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004361613703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Infomarsiscamer |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Infomarsiscamer |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 84 | -3 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 87 | -2 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 89 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 93 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 95 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 96 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 99 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 99 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 0s
- Average length
- 0s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 1 post, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| β€ | 1 | 12.5% | |
| π | 1 | 12.5% | |
| π | 1 | 12.5% | |
| π€ | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
YANG BISA DAPETIN INI ORANG INFO KE SINI @REZALGBIRAHI DAPATA IMBALAN UANG 50$
Signed ΰ½ΰΎ MarvΓ¨l
DAFTAR PENCARIAN ORANG!! DI CARI ORANG SCAMMER MEMBAWA DUIT, 10JT++ ketemu nya tanggal 1 agustus 2025, pacaran berjalan sampai lupa tanggal berapa pokoknya bulan mei udh renggang dikit. awal mula punya utang, diaa awalnya nanyaΒ² aku punya apk apa. aku kadang suka pake spinjam untuk keperluan tertentu. terus krna dia tau hal ituu, dia berusaha bujuk rayu untuk pinjol, awalΒ² pinjol semua lancar bayarnya. dri apk AdaKβ¦
Signed ΰ½ΰΎ MarvΓ¨l
KRONOLOGI : AWAL CHAT MINTA JOB JADI MD ATAU BANTU PUSH NDP DI KASIH TAU GB DIA https://t.me/cashbackbondepallweb GAMPANG PUSH 10 NDP ,DEAL PAY AWAL UANG CB AN DULU BUAT 20 NDP SEBESAR Rp 300,000 SETELAH DI TF SI KONTOL INI MINTA BOT OKE GUA KASIH AKSES UBOT SETELAH BOT GW KASIH AKSES DI BLOKIR SAMA SI KONTOL INI WKWKWK REK : 901106423987 BANK : SEABANK NAMA : MUHAMMAD ISHAQ JEKAK KERJASAMA : https://t.me/Kerjasamaβ¦
gua ajak ke gc gua buat oncam bareng tapi ga mau smskli, malah bikin ch skandal pake video yg di colong media skandal pake nama gua [link : https://t.me/+o3ElccccZIE3ZjM1] , selalu labrak orng yg feker dan nyerang bareng sirkel boty dia di ch yang sama padahal dia sendiri feker di ajak oncam g mau smskli ngatain fisik orng pdhl muka aja g punya , si @karbitanthegodss nyebar id gua bahkan smpe tmn tmn gua nge pc gua sβ¦
π₯4β€1π1π€1π1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Infomarsiscamer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππππππ¦π§ π¦πππ π ππ₯β (@Infomarsiscamer), 84 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Infomarsiscamer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.