Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌏🌹 InfoGeo Live News🌹🌏

@InfoGeoLiveNews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,092subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403597744
TypeChannel
Username@InfoGeoLiveNews
Created14 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/InfoGeoLiveNews

Growth

3,0923,1123,1027 August 2026 — 3,110 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,112 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,099 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,092 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,089–3,115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:553,092-7
11 Aug 2026, 00:083,099-13
7 Aug 2026, 23:243,112+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:013,110first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 3,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
433
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.404%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (19 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,731
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 09s
Average length
1m 54s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2335.4%
👏1929.2%
👍1015.4%
🔥1015.4%
🤔34.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC324 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

E pure oggi, in nessun altra parte del mondo al di fuori dell’Occidente, quello che abbiamo visto verrebbe definito con un termine diverso da “invasione”. Nell’Europa del 2026 invece, è una giornata come le altre.

1

31 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC323 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Un marocchino a Ceuta ammette di essere in fuga in quanto accusato di omicidio

16 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC667 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇮🇱Rothschild: "My family created Israel" 🚨 Epstein to Thiel: "I represent the Rothschilds." 🚨 Rothschilds paid Epstein $25M 🚨 Rothschilds assigned Epstein's lawyer Alan Dershowitz to Epstein 🚨 Maria Farmer says Ghislaine told her the Rothschilds are her greatest protector 👇THIS IS JFK JR’S OFFICIAL COMMAND CHANNEL https://t.me/JFKJRCOMMANDCENTER✅️

🔥3

25 Jun 2026, 06:13 UTC906 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @INTHESHADQWS

THE FIRST DOMINO HAS FALLEN. Keir Starmer — Prime Minister of the United Kingdom — RESIGNED YESTERDAY!!! They're saying it was "party pressure". They're telling you it was "polls". BULLSHIT. Here’s what REALLY happened: Starmer’s office as Director of Public Prosecutions (2008-13) sent WARNING LETTERS to 13,000 suspected grooming gang members. Not arrests . Not blame. LETTERS. “Don’t do it again. 250,000 BRITIS

🔥4

22 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC736 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ariabuonachannelPhoto

🇬🇧 ULTIMA ORA : Keir Starmer annuncia che si dimetterà dal suo ruolo di Primo Ministro e di leader del Partito Laburista. Chiederò al Comitato Esecutivo Nazionale del Partito Laburista di stabilire un calendario con nomine che inizieranno il 9 luglio e si concluderanno prima delle vacanze estive. In caso di contestazione, ciò consentirà di assicurare che un nuovo leader sia in carica prima del ritorno del Parlamento

4👍1🤔1

15 Jun 2026, 07:48 UTC734 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ivetasemetkova

https://rumble.com/v7b4koi-eisenhower-e-gli-alieni.html

12 Jun 2026, 20:05 UTC773 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ivetasemetkova

https://odysee.com/@Iveta:e/Eisenhower-e-gli-alieni:c?r=BmmUGha7koNATwkPM1UsYvTySQhhbAKj

11 Jun 2026, 09:12 UTC942 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

RICORDO A TUTTI CHE NE PARLO DA TEMPO NEL CANALE. GLI ALTRI CANALI NON NE PARLANO. MEDITATE GENTE. Risultati positivi dell'84,4% contro il cancro in 6 mesi con Ivermectina e un composto a base di bendazolo. Combatti il ​​cancro con una strategia antiparassitaria! I parassiti devono sparire. IN ESCLUSIVA https://t.me/lanuovanormalita ⬇️SOSTIENI IL CANALE⬇️ 💳 PAYPAL 💳 🥺SATISPAY🥺 💳💳💳CARTA DI CREDITO💳💳💳

10

7 Jun 2026, 16:58 UTC944 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

2🤔2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @InfoGeoLiveNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,160,305 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌏🌹 InfoGeo Live News🌹🌏” (@InfoGeoLiveNews), 3,092 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InfoGeoLiveNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.