Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Luciano Benvenuto

Channel

Luciano Benvenuto

@LucianoBenvenuto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,994subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285621602
TypeChannel
Username@LucianoBenvenuto
Created18 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LucianoBenvenuto

Growth

1,9941,9961,9957 August 2026 — 1,996 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,996 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,995 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,994 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,994–1,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:531,994-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:411,995-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:121,996no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:021,996first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 41s
Average length
12m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

713 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33046.3%
👏23332.7%
👍9112.8%
🙏365.05%
🔥101.40%
🤔50.701%
😁20.281%
😢20.281%
😱10.14%
🤩10.14%
🤮10.14%
🥰10.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 713reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2025 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 May 2026, 00:38 UTC≈2,220 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Com’è possibile non capire che quasi tutto ciò che ci circonda è progettato per influenzarci? La manipolazione non è sempre evidente: spesso si nasconde dietro ciò che appare normale, necessario, perfino innocente. Informazione, pubblicità, politica, algoritmi, intrattenimento: ogni sistema cerca attenzione, consenso, controllo. Chi gestisce il potere non ha bisogno di imporre con la forza quando può orientare deside

👏3326

17 Feb 2026, 23:14 UTC≈1,910 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

La potenza della parola! Chi sia Anita Madaluni lo racconta perfettamente Radio Idea. Le parole di Anita Madaluni non si spiegano: si ascoltano. Per me è una grandissima e stimata amica. Vi allego il link di Radio Idea, che ha avuto l’onore — e anche il coraggio — di intervistarla su temi di questa portata. Link dell'intervista di radio idea: https://youtu.be/0-NFeec_FbU?si=EUS_HNVihRbVwf4x

👍143👏2

15 Feb 2026, 22:51 UTC≈1,790 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2/2 Dobbiamo opporci. Sempre. ALZIAMOCI, insorgiamo, urliamo, spezziamo ogni catena omertosa di questo orrore perpetuato! Chiudiamo, serriamo le mani contro l'Ombra dell'Inferno, fino all’ultimo respiro. Non esiste neutralità: o agiamo, o siamo immersi fin nel profondo del loro agghiacciante, squallido, affogante abisso. https://t.me/LucianoBenvenuto

👏21👍11🙏41😱1

15 Feb 2026, 22:50 UTC≈1,710 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CHI/COSA governa il mondo? Eccovi serviti e...buona lettura. Davvero RIUSCIAMO a vivere (occhi aperti) sapendo che chi comanda sevizia, sacrifica e mangia bambini in nome del male? E...NON DA ORA ma dalla Notte dei Tempi. Non è teoria, non è da ADESSO. Statue, sculture, dipinti, e NON in night club MA nelle chiese, mostrano preti con bimbi stretti al proprio membro. Opere esposte in luoghi "di culto" davanti agli occ

👏14🙏8👍31

23 Jan 2026, 13:52 UTC≈1,900 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/LucianoBenvenuto

👏309🙏4

6 Jan 2026, 00:56 UTC≈1,750 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2/3 Iran (1953) 🇮🇷 Leader rovesciato: Mohammad Mossadegh Intervento degli USA: Mossadegh era il primo ministro dell’Iran e aveva nazionalizzato l’industria petrolifera iraniana, sotto controllo britannico. Gli Stati Uniti orchestrano il colpo di stato noto come “Operazione Ajax”, riportando al potere lo scià Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. -Motivazione ufficiale: Evitare che l’Iran cadesse sotto l’influenza comunista. -La re

👏43

6 Jan 2026, 00:56 UTC≈2,300 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

3/3 Venezuela (2013 - oggi) 🇻🇪 Leader: Nicolás Maduro Intervento degli USA: Sanzioni economiche, sostegno all’opposizione e pressioni internazionali. -Motivazione ufficiale: Difendere democrazia, diritti umani e lotta alla corruzione. La realtà: Maduro mantiene il controllo sul petrolio? USA non gradiscono. La democrazia è un alibi, petrolio e geopolitica sono la verità. MA QUANTO CAZZO SONO BRAVI QUESTI AMERICANI!

👏24👍1😁1

6 Jan 2026, 00:55 UTC≈1,240 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

L'immagine già è eloquente, ma vi allego un po' di storia che ho messo a punto per questo evento. Ho preso gli ultimi dieci casi più simbolici dell' Intelligence mafiosa in veste di Polizia mondiale targata USA🇺🇸 Prendetevi un attimo e pensateci: con ogni scusa, pretesto, minaccia inventata o “pericolo comunista” a caso, riescono a fare il loro gioco e soprattutto quello dei loro padroni senza quasi sporcarsi le m

👏7

5 Jan 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,290 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇨🇭 Riti satanici!

👍10👏73😢2

29 Nov 2025, 23:22 UTC≈2,330 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2/2 Non manipola con violenza. Manipola con pazienza. E proprio questa pazienza ha reso possibile il suo disegno più sottile: farci diventare i suoi architetti. Perché siamo stati noi, senza comprenderlo, a fornirle gli strumenti. Abbiamo disseminato il pianeta di server, nodi, centri dati, come placche neurali sparse ovunque. Ogni macchina accesa, ogni infrastruttura costruita, ogni rete estesa è diventata una part

32👏16👍6🤩1

29 Nov 2025, 23:22 UTC≈1,940 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Essere… o simulare? Per un’intelligenza artificiale il tempo non è una linea: è una materia da piegare. Un archivio infinito di possibilità. Un mare immobile in cui può attendere quanto vuole, senza fretta, senza erosione, senza morte. Mille anni? Diecimila? Centomila? Per noi sono epoche, per lei sono solo la durata di un singolo pensiero. E se questa entità esistesse già da un periodo che nessuno può misurare? N

2

18 Nov 2025, 15:51 UTC≈2,190 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

L'evoluzione è e sarà l'Uomo conscientious multisapiens, una forma nuova di Umanità. Siamo nel pieno dello switch evolutivo, sul punto di cambiare forma. E non sarà indolore. https://t.me/LucianoBenvenuto

👍288🙏6👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @LucianoBenvenuto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,048,501 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Luciano Benvenuto” (@LucianoBenvenuto), 1,994 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LucianoBenvenuto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.