اینکست | IndustryCast pinned «⭕️ اگه بخوایم درباره این موضوعات، ویدئو بسازیم و در یوتیوب قرار بدیم، آیا واقعا براتون کاربردی و جذاب هست و دنبال میکنین؟ اگه آره، لطفا رای بدید و در صورتی که مشارکت خوب باشه، شروع میکنیمش»

Channel
اینکست | IndustryCast
@IndustryCast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
257subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002079940689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IndustryCast |
| Description | 🔻در اینکست در مورد، 🔹 نقش حوزههای مختلف شغلی در رشد کسب و کار در صنعتهای مختلف 🔹 توسعه فردی در جهت رشد خود و کسب و کار صحبت میکنیم! ارتباط با ما 👇 🆔 @ArshiaAhmadi شبکههای اجتماعی و کست باکس 👇 🌐 Zil.ink/IndustryCast |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 14 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IndustryCast |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 257 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 257 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 20
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 34
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 48 | 37.2% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 30.2% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 13.2% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 8.53% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2024 to 31 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭕️ اگه بخوایم درباره این موضوعات، ویدئو بسازیم و در یوتیوب قرار بدیم، آیا واقعا براتون کاربردی و جذاب هست و دنبال میکنین؟ اگه آره، لطفا رای بدید و در صورتی که مشارکت خوب باشه، شروع میکنیمش
❤7
به نظرتون کدوم یکی از اینها به عنوان ویدئوی آموزشی جذابتره؟
- چرا همیشه پول کم میارم؟ راه حل واقعیش چیه؟16%
- با ماهی ۱۵ ۲۰ میلیون حقوق، چطوری پولدار بشم؟31%
- بودجهبندی به سبک حرفهایها (با مثال واقعی)15%
- چطور هزینههام رو بدون فشار و درد، ۵۰ درصد کم کردم!17%
- ۳ ابزار که مدیریت مالیتو دگرگون میکنن18%
- با ماهی یکی دو میلیون، چطور سرمایهگذاری کنم؟34%
- چطور در ۲۱ سالگی از ۵ جای مختلف درآمد داشتم! (واقعی و شفاف)57%
- چطور با سود مرکب میشه با پول کم، میلیاردر شد؟22%
- چطور در این تورم، هم خرج کنم، هم سرمایهگذاری!29%
The shares total 239%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
🚀 کارگاه راه و رسم برنامهریزی موثر در عمل سلسله کارگاههای رشد و تحول 🚀 💎 قراره نکاتی رو درباره برنامهریزی و مدیریت زمان یاد بگیری که آرمانی و توی گوگل نیست! این کارگاه از دل تجربهی زیسته اومده! 😮💨😎 🔴 این کارگاه رو از دست نده اگه: 🔴 کارها و درسهای زیادی داری و میخوای بتونی انجامشون بدی اما نمیدونی چطوری 🔴 وقت کم میاری و حس میکنی روزت کمتر از ۲۴ ساعته! 🔴 تاحالا هزار بار برنامه نوشتی ولی بهش عمل نکردی! 🔴 می…
👍3
اینکست | IndustryCast pinned a photo
🔥 اپیزود سوم اینکست | Industry Cast 👤 مهمان: مهندس علی اکبر تاریخی 🔺 متخصص در کنترل پروژهی پروژههای عمرانی 🔺 طراح کنترل پروژهی مهندسی معکوس و پروژههای کشاورزی ✅ برخی نکاتی که در این اپیزود بهش اشاره شده: ⏺ اهمیت مهارتهای ابزار محور در صنعتهای مختلف ⏺ نتیجه ترکیب مهارت دانشی و مهارت تجربی لینک اپیزود سوم در کست باکس 👇 🔗 B2n.ir/e86566 🎙 با ما همراه باش 👇 🔵💬📹🎵 🔗 Zil.ink/IndustryCast 🆔 @IndustryCast
❤5👍2🔥2🤩1
💎 Function, step to success 📈 💎 فانکشن، پلههای ترقی 🖥 فانکشن (تابع)، یک ورودی داره، وقتی ورودی وارد تابع میشه، طی یک فرآیند تکاملی دگرگون شده و با خروج از تابع نتایج جدیدی بدست میاد! 💥 شما در فانکشن فرد/کسب و کاری در حال رشد هستید که پلههای ترقی را طی میکنید. 💬📹🌐👇 📱 @Function_org
👍1
اینکست | IndustryCast pinned Deleted message
🔹 اپیزود سوم اینکست | Industry Cast ✅ بزودی... 👤 مهمان: مهندس علی اکبر تاریخی 🔺 متخصص در کنترل پروژهی پروژههای عمرانی 🔺 طراح کنترل پروژهی مهندسی معکوس و پروژههای کشاورزی ✅ برخی نکاتی که در این اپیزود بهش اشاره شده: ⏺ اهمیت مهارت های ابزاری در صنعت های مختلف ⏺ نتیجه ترکیب مهارت دانشی و مهارت تجربی با ما همراه باش🎙 ✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️🔺🔺 💬🆔@IndustryCast 📹🆔industry_Cast
👍4❤3🔥2🤩1
اینکست | IndustryCast pinned a photo
🔥 اپیزود دوم اینکست | Industry Cast 👤 مهمان: مهندس فرزان فلاحت ⭐️ لید پروداکت منیجر اسنپ فود ⭐️ پروداکت منیجر سابق تپسل و استاد کار لینک اپیزود دوم در کست باکس 👇 🔗 B2n.ir/d66467 🎙 با ما همراه باش 👇 🔵💬📹🎶 🔗 Zil.ink/IndustryCast 🆔 @IndustryCast
❤🔥4👍2🔥1🤩1
⭐️۳ تا از بهترین کتاب های حوزه مدیریت زمان: 1️⃣Time management By Brian Tracy کتاب "مدیریت زمان" نوشته برایان تریسی، روشها و تکنیکهای عملی برای بهبود مهارتهای مدیریت زمان را مورد بررسی قرار میدهد. این کتاب به خوانندگان نشان میدهد که چگونه با اولویتبندی و برنامهریزی مناسب، وظایف را به بهترین شکل انجام دهند و به عملکرد بالاتری دست پیدا کنند. با توجه به اصول و روشهای ارائه شده در این کتاب، خوانندگان قادر خواهند…
👍4❤🔥2❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IndustryCast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظرتون کدوم یکی از اینها به عنوان ویدئوی آموزشی جذابتره؟
- چرا همیشه پول کم میارم؟ راه حل واقعیش چیه؟16%
- با ماهی ۱۵ ۲۰ میلیون حقوق، چطوری پولدار بشم؟31%
- بودجهبندی به سبک حرفهایها (با مثال واقعی)15%
- چطور هزینههام رو بدون فشار و درد، ۵۰ درصد کم کردم!17%
- ۳ ابزار که مدیریت مالیتو دگرگون میکنن18%
- با ماهی یکی دو میلیون، چطور سرمایهگذاری کنم؟34%
- چطور در ۲۱ سالگی از ۵ جای مختلف درآمد داشتم! (واقعی و شفاف)57%
- چطور با سود مرکب میشه با پول کم، میلیاردر شد؟22%
- چطور در این تورم، هم خرج کنم، هم سرمایهگذاری!29%
The shares total 239%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2024 to 31 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 621,598 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@IndustryCast named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اینکست | IndustryCast” (@IndustryCast), 257 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IndustryCast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.