Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

بانک‌ اکسپرت و اندیکاتور

@Indicator_Expert_Bank

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,679subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001401050840
TypeChannel
Username@Indicator_Expert_Bank
Descriptionطراحی و ساخت انواع استراتژی، اکسپرت و اندیکاتور برای MT4 & MT5 با بالاترین کیفیت و مناسب‌ترین قیمت ⚙️ 📈 معرفی اندیکاتورها و استراتژی‌های سودده 😎 دیگه پشت چارت نشستن بسته! 📩 هر سوالی داشتی پیام بده: @programmer_mql 📣 کانال ما رو به دوستانت معرفی کن
CreatedBetween 1 August 2018 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Indicator_Expert_Bank

Growth

10,64210,67910,660.56 August 2026 — 10,642 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,642 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,657 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,653 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,666 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,659 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,679 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,636–10,685 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:5210,679+20
11 Aug 2026, 02:1110,659-7
9 Aug 2026, 23:3710,666+13
8 Aug 2026, 21:1210,653-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:3710,657+15
6 Aug 2026, 20:3010,642no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:2310,642first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.38%
avg views ÷ 10,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
895
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held56 (23 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total50,106
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,590
Videos
358
Links
2,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 31 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8680.4%
👏1413.1%
👍76.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC111 viewsread 12 August 2026

#فوری دلار داره آرامش قبل طوفان رو تجربه میکنه و ممکنه بزودی حرکت بزرگش رو آغاز کنه رفقایی که نمیدونن دلار میریزه یا رشد میکنه عضو کانال تحلیلمون بشن بهتون میگیم: @dolarcenter

11 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC157 viewsread 11 August 2026

ارز ش این کانالا. به اوج نزدیک است حیفه از دست ندین پنهان کاری دقل بازی وجود نداره و دوس داری pnl📈 همتون مثبت باشه پس این کانالا رو از دست ندین😍

11 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC194 viewsread 11 August 2026

.🔴⚠️ اعضای گرامی‌کانال توجه کنید دوستانی که برای روند بازار و نحوه سود دهی سوال داشتند و نگرانی منبع سیگنال برای سود کردن داشتند، تنها کانال هایی که قبولشون داریم تنها کانال های زیر هستند (خودمون هم داخلشونیم 👌🤭)👇👇👇👇🔥:

11 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC698 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

🔵🔴استراتژی Forex Trend نسخه 2026 یه سیستم ترند-فالوینگ ساده و بدون شلوغی چارت، مخصوص کسایی که از تأخیر سیگنال خسته شدن ⏱ 📌 مناسب برای معامله‌گرانی که دنبال سیستم‌های کم‌نویز و پرایس اکشن-محور هستن. جزئیات کامل استراتژی رو در پست ببینید 👆 🔗 برای دریافت مشاوره اختصاصی به آیدی زیر پیام بدید: 👤 @programmer_mql #فارکس #استراتژی_معاملاتی #متاتریدر #ترید #تحلیل_تکنیکال #Forex #TradingStrategy #MT4 #MT5 @indicator_exp

4

11 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC750 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔵🔴 استراتژی Forex Trend نسخه 2026 یه سیستم ترند-فالوینگ ساده و بدون شلوغی چارت، مخصوص کسایی که از تأخیر سیگنال خسته شدن ⏱ ━━━━━━━━━━ 📊 اندیکاتورهای مورد نیاز: ✅ Channel_trend *(جهت ترند)* ✅ Filter *(تأیید مومنتوم)* ✅ T_DOT*(تأیید نوسان)* ✅ Trend *(فیلتر ترند)* ━━━━━━━━━━ 🟢 ورود BUY: 🔹 Channel_trend→ آبی 🔹 Filter → آبی 🔹 T_DOT → تأیید صعودی 🔴 ورود SELL: 🔹 Channel_trend → قرمز 🔹 Filter → قرمز 🔹 T_DOT→ تأیید نز

1

10 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC86 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://t.me/+n1NuGRd8ts5hNDM0 https://t.me/+n1NuGRd8ts5hNDM0

10 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC85 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

به درخواست اعضای محترم چنلمون تصمیم گرفتم vip رو به مدت 10روز رایگان کنم نظرتون؟

  1. عالی میشه لینکشو بده✅67%
  2. نه اشتراک میگیرم👌33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @Indicator_Expert_Bank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

به درخواست اعضای محترم چنلمون تصمیم گرفتم vip رو به مدت 10روز رایگان کنم نظرتون؟

  1. عالی میشه لینکشو بده✅67%
  2. نه اشتراک میگیرم👌33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTCAnonymous Poll2 voters

موافق هستید برای دقایقی لینک Vip رو بصورت رایگان بزاریم؟

  1. بله50%
  2. خیر50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 571,582 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سیگنال فارکس ARAD
@ARAD_FX1 · 195,207
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان 🐊Crocodile Trade
@crocodile_trade · 196,617
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بانک‌ اکسپرت و اندیکاتور” (@Indicator_Expert_Bank), 10,679 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Indicator_Expert_Bank.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.