Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
بانک اکسپرت و اندیکاتور
@Indicator_Expert_Bank
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,717subscribers
+75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001401050840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Indicator_Expert_Bank |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Indicator_Expert_Bank |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 10,717 | +8 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 10,709 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 10,713 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 10,718 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 10,725 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 10,733 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 10,737 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 10,742 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 10,740 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 10,748 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 10,749 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 10,747 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 10,748 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 10,747 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 10,749 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 10,761 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 10,769 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 10,772 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 10,780 | +16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 10,764 | first reading |
Engagement
87 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 87 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
151 reactions across 42 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 123 | 81.5% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 7.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
9نفر دیگه بدون پول میپذیریم ❌👆
❤1
لینک vip😍😍😍😍😍👇 https://t.me/+r34ss-GKMetjMDU0
❤1
👇🏿
یه لینک میزارم براتون پانزده دیقه رایگان
👏1
موافق هستین برای دقایقی لینک vip رو بذارم کانال؟
- خیر عضو هستم0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
https://t.me/+Nqo3bDyQhg4zZjVk
👏1
واسه سیگنال برید اینجا
❤1
👇
ب دستور استاد عزیزم دیگه اینجا سیگنال نمیدم
👍1
ارز ش این کانالا. به اوج نزدیک است حیفه از دست ندین پنهان کاری دقل بازی وجود نداره و دوس داری pnl📈 همتون مثبت باشه پس این کانالا رو از دست ندین😍
❤1
.🚨نجیب ترین و بهترین مردم دنیارو داریم اما متاسفانه سیاستهای جهانی به سمت تحقیر ملت شریف ما رفته که حقشون ثروته نه ذلت 🧬💎 امشب رو لیستی از برترین کانالای (vip)را واستون پیداکردم لینکاشونومیزارم داخل همشون عضوشید❤️👇 تضمینی سیگنالاتو بگیر دیگه اینجا👇 حملهههههههههههههههههههههههههههه 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👇👇👇 🔥 https://t.me/+bNlmcVr84Tc0ZWM0 🔥https://t.me/+vkyeB5UUeTVjYzZk 🔥https://t.me/+7XoL04mqCSowOWZk 🔥https://t.me/+ntVgTXQ8Nk…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @Indicator_Expert_Bank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
موافق هستین برای دقایقی لینک vip رو بذارم کانال؟
- خیر عضو هستم0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگه لینک VIP رو 7 روز رایگان کنیم شرکت میکنید ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
- حتماااااا بذار40%
- نه60%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
به درخواست اعضای محترم چنلمون تصمیم گرفتم vip رو به مدت 10روز رایگان کنم نظرتون؟
- عالی میشه لینکشو بده✅67%
- نه اشتراک میگیرم👌33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
موافق هستید برای دقایقی لینک Vip رو بصورت رایگان بزاریم؟
- بله50%
- خیر50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BinaryOption_ir · 35,673
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 September 2026
@fx_khanjani · 51,508
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@ARAD_FX1 · 161,178
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
@Paroo_Zan · 67,099
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
@erfanmms · 29,057
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@Trendofx · 20,936
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
@drarashamini · 29,188
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
@meysamdehqani · 71,093
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
@ARKA_GOLD · 22,450
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@zorafx_fa · 51,141
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
@MISHOV_FOREX · 50,801
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@forexfactory_persian · 53,770
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
@GOLDSIGNALFXPRO · 21,997
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
@strategyclose · 30,593
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 September 2026
@IBOChannel · 21,022
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
@zorafx_academy · 31,695
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
@mehran_investt · 24,327
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
@FOREXSTREET1 · 48,853
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
@forexcino · 205,860
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
@lamozsh_borsl · 22,670
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@CryptoTradingWolf · 41,438
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 August 2026
@FOREXSTREET11 · 34,069
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
@crocodile_trade · 209,576
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@Glory_Trader · 26,747
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بانک اکسپرت و اندیکاتور” (@Indicator_Expert_Bank), 10,717 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Indicator_Expert_Bank.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.