سیگنال و آموزش انس جهانی طلا
استخراج واعلام سیگنال انس با متود ict 2025
پیشرفته
کسب سود روزانه 100 پیپ در کانال
ادمین :@fxusdgold
کانال آموزش ما
@amozeshxauusd
برآیند کانال
@vip20signall
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,534. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,923–22,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 22:56
21,153
-17
8 Nov 2026, 16:39
21,170
-22
7 Nov 2026, 08:37
21,192
-29
6 Nov 2026, 07:39
21,221
-24
5 Nov 2026, 05:59
21,245
-16
4 Nov 2026, 07:06
21,261
-12
3 Nov 2026, 07:30
21,273
-20
2 Nov 2026, 06:59
21,293
-15
1 Nov 2026, 06:39
21,308
-12
31 Oct 2026, 08:00
21,320
-11
30 Oct 2026, 07:36
21,331
-15
29 Oct 2026, 05:09
21,346
-24
27 Oct 2026, 23:41
21,370
-25
26 Oct 2026, 21:16
21,395
-20
25 Oct 2026, 18:38
21,415
-11
24 Oct 2026, 19:47
21,426
-21
23 Oct 2026, 18:17
21,447
-21
22 Oct 2026, 16:16
21,468
-24
21 Oct 2026, 08:27
21,492
-28
20 Oct 2026, 09:14
21,520
first reading
Engagement
547 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.939%
avg views ÷ 21,153 subscribers
Avg views / post
199
143 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
148
of 547 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 143 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
547 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
28,414
Reactions total
49
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 08:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,050
Videos
≈151
Links
≈829
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
430 reactions across 169 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
355
82.6%
🏆
24
5.58%
👏
18
4.19%
🔥
9
2.09%
🤝
9
2.09%
👍
4
0.93%
😍
4
0.93%
🍾
3
0.698%
🤩
3
0.698%
👌
1
0.233%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 547 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 453 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 547 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 148 posts held from the last 30 days (0.676%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نحوه انتخاب حجم برای سیگنال ها
نکات مهم استفاده از سیگنال ها
درمورد انتخاب حجم معاملات :
شما حق استفاده از حجمی را دارید که اگر آن معامله حد خورد نهایتا ۲ درصد(قانون)
سرمایه را از دست دهید .
برای مثال اگر شما مارجین ۱۰ هزار دلاری دارید پس
۱۰ هزار ضبدر دو درصدمیشود۲۰۰ دلار
شما فقط باید ۲۰۰ دلار ضرر کنید
✅ مثال اگر سیگنالی ارسال شد که حد ضرر آن ۲/۵ دلاری است
در واقع حد ضرر ۲۵۰ point دارد
تعریف پوینت هر یک دلار ج…
Showing the 12 most recent of 547 posts we hold for @GOLDSIGNALFXPRO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 27 posts on @GOLDSIGNALFXPRO as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
23 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سیگنال طلا ۱۰۰٪درصدی @signal_ba_crypto · 19,186 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 September 2026
سیگنال انس جهانی Bitgold @signal_fxgold · 143,048 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
فارکس /سیگنال طلا @bitgold987 · 113,011 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 August 2026
سیگنال فارکس Liveforex @freesignal_live · 31,599 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
XAUUSD GOLD PIPS @XAUUSD_GOLD_PIPS_SIGNAL · 103,894 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 14 August 2026
📊 Nikgold_forex 📚 @Nikgold_forex · 21,631 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
پاروزَن(جادوگَرِ نقّاش) @Paroo_Zan · 57,655 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
سرمایهگذاری | دکتر کاردان @uns_invest · 26,566 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026
زدبورس | علی نیک افروز @zburse_official · 127,919 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
آکادمی بای تریدر| buy.trader @buytrader110 · 19,282 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 10 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GOLD SIGNAL سیگنال انس طلا” (@GOLDSIGNALFXPRO), 21,153 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOLDSIGNALFXPRO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.