Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Верю только трендам

@InTrendsWeTrust

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

989subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657943572
TypeChannel
Username@InTrendsWeTrust
DescriptionПишу про нейро-будущее, digital-настоящее и ностальгирую по кейсам прошлого @FeedBackTrendo_bot — вопросы, предложения
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/InTrendsWeTrust

Growth

9897 Aug 2026, 11:20 — 989 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:32 — 989 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:207 Aug 2026, 11:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 988–990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 11:32989no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:20989first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
315
Videos
351
Links
254

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

527 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7614.4%
🔥6512.3%
🤯5811.0%
519.68%
🐳499.30%
😱489.11%
🙏478.92%
😁397.40%
🌚305.69%
💯295.50%
🤔234.36%
😢101.90%
10.19%
👏10.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 527reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2026, 09:17 UTC492 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sosindex

Не вайб-кодер, а клодовщик

🌚11😱9🤯7😁5

15 Jun 2026, 06:50 UTC605 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как они все трое должны ауевать от соседства такого 🤣

👍13🤯10😁83

10 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTC599 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sstarovoytov

Разблокировке Роблокса в нашем телеграме радуются так, что впору вводить новый государственный праздник. 10 июня - День Роблокса! Оригинально, молодежно и интернационально. Следующая степень свободы - амнистировать квадроберов. В общем, ни дня без побед.

😱25🐳4😁2

8 May 2026, 18:19 UTC687 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот так хорошо!) https://t.me/lobushkinflash/18895

🌚14🤔8👍3🤯3😁1

8 May 2026, 17:03 UTC544 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну уж Лобушкин, к которому Яндекс захаживал с рекламой мог и комментарий добавить, что все-таки дело в том, как модели обучаются, а не в том, что в российской компании сознательно делают подобные шаги при обучении моделей. Сабж: вероятно модель действительно могла выдать подобное изображение — но из этого не следует вывод, что где-то в Яндексе сидит специальный отдел, который вручную «зашивает» такие смыслы в генера

👍18🙏10

22 Apr 2026, 07:50 UTC591 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Итак, произошло много событий. И начать, наверное, хочется со вчерашнего выхода новой графической GPT-модели. Что я сейчас вижу: всему, что мы видим, больше нельзя доверять. Seedance 2.0 и новые модели от GPT позволяют генерировать буквально всё что угодно — переписки, чеки, любые ситуации, любые «доказательства». Причём это уже не просто картинки — это видео, максимально нативные, почти неотличимые от реальности.

💯14🔥1381👏1

21 Mar 2026, 08:03 UTC615 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самое тут страшное, что чаще всего такие перфомансы как раз частная инициатива, чтобы показать проактивно свое следование трендам, которые пытаются тонко уловить всякие директора, продюсеры или кураторы. И как водится, даже у самой странной, безумной или нелепой инициативы — есть сторонники, и потом это все уже несется выше в духе: "Вон, смотрите, мы вот такую песню выпустили, а вон в интернетах (да-да, которые надо

👍15🙏11🤯81

21 Mar 2026, 07:32 UTC583 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я как-то даже не знаю с чего начать https://t.me/economy_news/22518

🤔13🤯11👍8😢2🌚1

12 Mar 2026, 10:40 UTC654 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нет ничего прекраснее, чем читать новости о смерти платформы на самой платформе. https://t.me/whackdoor/26879 Паноптикум, реально

🤯19😁6😢4🤔2

6 Mar 2026, 12:48 UTC477 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🐱 Триумфальное возвращение кота. Nano banana 2 + SeeDance 2.0 По всей видимости, пора запускать про него цикл видео. Поработать с новым инструментом — восторг. В целом наверное благодаря ему первый раз понимаю, что все, что в голове крутится — теперь реально можно переносить "на бумагу", так сказать. Круто. Ставьте огонечки котику 🔥

18🔥11😱4👍3🙏2

5 Mar 2026, 20:20 UTC426 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

во у него день не задался https://t.me/bbbreaking/226129

9💯7😁6👍3😱3🔥2

4 Mar 2026, 20:01 UTC444 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Гхм-гхм. Начинаем потихоньку щупать Seedance 2.0 Пока задачка со * пробить защиту от генерации человеков. Но думаю завтра займусь ей плотнее. А так по 1 промпту творит удивительно точные вещи.

🐳21🔥10💯7👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @InTrendsWeTrust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Верю только трендам” (@InTrendsWeTrust), 989 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InTrendsWeTrust.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.