Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Воображаемый храм 18+😵🔥

@ImaginaryTemple

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,924subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526363051
TypeChannel
Username@ImaginaryTemple
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ImaginaryTemple

Growth

12,92412,96112,942.57 August 2026 — 12,961 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,961 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,959 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,956 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,949 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,941 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,928 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,924 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,918–12,967 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:2412,924-4
12 Aug 2026, 08:0712,928-13
11 Aug 2026, 05:2612,941-8
10 Aug 2026, 04:2012,949-7
9 Aug 2026, 03:5412,956-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:2612,959-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:0012,961no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:5912,961first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 12,924 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,920
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (13 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total78,410
Reactions total9,233
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10,372 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,59934.7%
🔥1,63915.8%
❤‍🔥1,60115.4%
💅1,07510.4%
🍓9068.74%
🥰7497.22%
🤩3243.12%
💘1911.84%
🕊790.762%
760.733%
🤯680.656%
💋320.309%
🎉180.174%
🍌90.087%
😈30.029%
😎30.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,372reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 22 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ImaginaryTemple. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,260 views217 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Товарищи как вы смотрите на раннее открытие предзаказов на мой замечательный мерч?✋ Я хотела сделать это в конце сентября, но мерч долго делаться будет возможно, хочется к ноябрю чтобы уже всем все отправилось…

148🔥42🍓16🥰7💘2❤‍🔥1🕊1

11 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈2,880 views490 reactions15 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

А у кого это сегодня День рождения 🤩 Ой у меня

324🥰76💅46🎉18❤‍🔥16🍓7😈3

8 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈2,210 views368 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Делаю стикерпак!!! Он ещё не прям готов, я скорее всего ещё добавлю что-то, а что-то уберу и поменяю, но мне пока нравится 🤔

🥰22692💅30❤‍🔥9🍓5🔥51

5 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,190 views464 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Полноценка чуть-чуть🤫 #drstone #арт

315❤‍🔥84🤩43🍓9💘5🕊5🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈3,630 views421 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ещё одна маленькая лента 🌟

🍓25493❤‍🔥53🔥15😎3💘21

31 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈4,130 views399 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Пришлось сделать ещё одну ленту, мммм подумаю что можно ещё красивого с ней сделать 🤔

💅25287🥰40❤‍🔥6🍓6💘53

26 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC≈4,840 views421 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Все было ради значков 🙏

289🥰67💅34❤‍🔥13🍓7💘6🔥5

26 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC≈4,200 views408 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Так ну Сай пока завершает эту серию на время!! Очень хотела его нарисовать, не зря он считается нереальной красоткой 🥺 #арт #drstone

274❤‍🔥83🥰35🔥8🍓7💘1

25 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC≈3,940 views442 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Не будет он ничего показывать 🙄 #drstone #арт

💅249116🔥45🥰13💘8🤩6🍓5

23 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,870 views423 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Красотка, почему-то сложно было его рисовать… 3 часа потратила (Я понимаю что его восхитительные шрамы показывают на его левое нереально умное полушарие но мне так хочется сделать их ровными каждый раз🙏 усложнили мне морально рисование) #drstone #арт

🤩226125🍓47💅11❤‍🔥7🔥6💘1

22 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC≈4,320 views623 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Быстрый скетч за 20 минут потому что могу 🤩 #drstone #скетч

🔥360🍓119111❤‍🔥19🍌5💘5🥰4

22 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC≈3,910 views454 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ну мой🫰 #drstone #арт

❤‍🔥271111🔥50🍓14💘52🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ImaginaryTemple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 685,755 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Воображаемый храм 18+😵🔥” (@ImaginaryTemple), 12,924 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ImaginaryTemple.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.