Channel
@ImScarrdd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
288subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001405964861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ImScarrdd |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ImScarrdd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 288 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 288 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 764 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
$Gwood is ramping up their product is not even live and they are revamping their whole Website/UX. Feel like this can be very special based on the info I am receiving.
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
Vlad followed WEN wonder whats next. LAMBO giveaway?
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
0xa80eb66b3e0cf66ccb46f8b8c9e7ff5803eeb820
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
Video, posted without a caption
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
https://x.com/P0Systems/status/2082544656131477889
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
LMAO he is calling solana faggots and retards 😂😭
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
Dev of $P0 is raising money to buy 2 MILLION in GPUS to host compute in house! this will drastically increase margins and they solidified on openrouter already.
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
i think $P0 goes crazy at some point its a fraction of the nearest competitor with more output from users and growing revenue
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
https://x.com/MCGlive/status/2081900695310196792
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
HmTi3CQfKfXWbn1tNoiAxH7GzMV7L3tDAmPWabZEBAGS
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
Tailing Unihax here on $GWOOD heard some things about this and noticed its been holding range for days
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
aped 0.5% of $GWOOD neobank on RH, thinks Avici but better 0x24d8657e10af588b12de3e102a116f77b9e35ee8
Signed CryptoCEEZ | SCARRDD
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ImScarrdd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 818,209 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SCARRDD.ETH 🏍” (@ImScarrdd), 288 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ImScarrdd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.