Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Il NOcheUNISCE: Psicologi per la Dignità Professionale

Channel

Il NOcheUNISCE: Psicologi per la Dignità Professionale

@IlnocheUniscePsy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

518subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001963695224
TypeChannel
Username@IlnocheUniscePsy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/IlnocheUniscePsy

Growth

5165185177 August 2026 — 516 subscribers8 August 2026 — 516 subscribers15 August 2026 — 518 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 516–518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:25518+2
8 Aug 2026, 04:04516no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:22516first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.7%
avg views ÷ 518 subscribers
Avg views / post
361
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,529
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC177 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Buongiorno ☀️ Grazie a tutti coloro che stanno firmando e che stanno dando senso a questa petizione! Siamo felici che stia circolando e che possa dare voce alle istanze di molte persone che, come noi, desiderano manifestare la propria voce, fedeli al proprio senso critico e libere di informarsi a fondo su questioni così importanti, controverse e delicate. Grazie! E’ un’apertura sociale che stiamo alimentando insieme:

1

6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC543 viewsread 8 August 2026

Mentre in Europa sempre più si raccomanda cautela e si applica il modello watchful waiting, che predilige la terapia psicologica ed esplorativa per la disforia di genere nei minori, in Italia l’Ordine degli Psicologi partecipa attivamente al Pride, che propaganda la rapida transizione medica per i bambini, prevista nei percorsi “affermativi”. Sbalorditivo. Invitiamo tutti a firmare e a diffondere la petizione, grazi

6 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,160 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

INVITO A SOTTOSCRIVERE LA PETIZIONE: Lo schieramento politico-ideologico dell’Ordine degli Psicologi al Pride - NON IN NOSTRO NOME ✍️💪 Cari Colleghi e Cittadini tutti, questa petizione è stata scritta con l’intento di richiamare l’Ordine degli Psicologi alla sua funzione, per la tutela dei minori, del pensiero critico e di un’autentica autodeterminazione; e per salvaguardare inoltre la credibilità della professione

1

27 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC150 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @radio28tvPhoto

Saranno introdotte bambole di carta "transgender" in alcune aule scolastiche statunitensi, in modo che i bambini possano imparare sulle diverse possibilità di chi possono essere Le bambole avranno diversi tipi di genitali, nomi neutri rispetto al genere e diversi set di abiti. I pezzi di carta che rappresentano i genitali potranno essere scambiati. Tuttavia, non si sa ancora se i genitori potranno rifiutare tali att

27 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC206 viewsread 8 August 2026

E questo è un articolo di Thanopulos, presidente Società Psicoanalitica Italiana, sempre in merito alla guida Oltre lo sguardo. La questione sta fortunatamente sollevando diverse critiche e diversi esperti si stanno facendo sentire! https://www.huffingtonpost.it/blog/2026/07/25/news/pediatria_lgbtqia_e_disforia_di_genere-22424508/

27 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC145 viewsread 8 August 2026

Buongiorno ☀️ Un importante documento che possiamo firmare e diffondere! https://www.generazioned.org/disforia-di-genere-in-eta-evolutiva-300-professionisti-sanitari-italiani-firmano-primum-non-nocere/

8 Jun 2026, 13:30 UTC918 viewsread 8 August 2026

📣 RIMANDATO IL QUARTO WEBINAR DEL CNOP SUL CODICE DEONTOLOGICO: Cari colleghi, vi informiamo che il quarto e ultimo incontro online organizzato dal CNOP nell’ambito dei lavori per la revisione del Codice Deontologico e denominato “Costruire insieme il Codice. Piattaforma digitale e strumenti di partecipazione” non si terrà questa sera, contrariamente a quanto previsto. L’incontro è stato posticipato infatti al 13 lu

25 May 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,120 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📣 STASERA, LUNEDÌ 25 MAGGIO, ORE 21: L’ARCHITETTURA DEL LEGAME INVISIBILE Qual’è il ruolo delle organizzazioni internazionali nella modifica del Codice Deontologico degli Psicologi Italiani? Cari Colleghi, questo sarà l’argomento del meet di stasera sul nostro Codice Deontologico, un argomento complesso, che fa luce su realtà fondamentali da approfondire, per una scelta consapevole sulla nostra deontologia. Come le

1

23 May 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,240 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📣 LUNEDÌ 25 MAGGIO, ORE 21: L’ARCHITETTURA DEL LEGAME INVISIBILE Qual’è il ruolo delle organizzazioni internazionali nella modifica del Codice Deontologico degli Psicologi Italiani? Cari Colleghi, questo sarà l’argomento del prossimo meet sul nostro Codice Deontologico, un argomento complesso, che fa luce su realtà fondamentali da approfondire, per una scelta consapevole sulla nostra deontologia. Come le volte scor

11 May 2026, 18:44 UTC249 viewsread 8 August 2026

E’ iniziata la diretta del webinar dell’Ordine: https://www.facebook.com/OrdinedegliPsicologi/videos/971900225432319/

10 May 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Domani ci sarà il terzo webinar dell’Ordine in cui ci presenterebbero i dati completi sui procedimenti disciplinari di tutta Italia, svolti negli ultimi 15 anni. Sarà interessante osservare se e quanto il numero di procedimenti disciplinari possa giustificare il rafforzamento della funzione disciplinare che vogliono inserire all’interno della nostra deontologia! Da un breve calcolo ci risulta che il numero di proced

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IlnocheUniscePsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 562,493 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Il NOcheUNISCE: Psicologi per la Dignità Professionale” (@IlnocheUniscePsy), 518 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IlnocheUniscePsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.