Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ilhomjon's Blog | English

Channel

Ilhomjon's Blog | English

@Ilhomjons_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

316subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003314756482
TypeChannel
Username@Ilhomjons_blog
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ilhomjons_blog

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31633832710 August 2026 — 337 subscribers11 August 2026 — 338 subscribers18 August 2026 — 335 subscribers26 August 2026 — 326 subscribers1 September 2026 — 322 subscribers10 September 2026 — 317 subscribers19 September 2026 — 316 subscribers10 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 313–341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:01316-1
10 Sept 2026, 07:55317-5
1 Sept 2026, 09:34322-4
26 Aug 2026, 05:53326-9
18 Aug 2026, 20:56335-3
11 Aug 2026, 00:21338+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:30337first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1850.0%
🔥1233.3%
38.33%
12.78%
🆒12.78%
👌12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The table illustrates information about the amounts of money allocated by the USA, EU countries and “other” countries to developing countries between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the figures for all countries adhered to rising trends, albeit to different degrees. Notably, the EU nations and countries in the “other” category allocated relatively similar amounts over the years. By contrast, those of the USA were disproporti

🔥2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC33 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? There is a view that newspapers will remain the most preferred source of news for people regardless of the growing number of readers turning to the internet to access news. While I understand the reasoning behind it, I believe newspape

🔥2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The line graph compares the percentages of people in four age categories who went to the cinema once a month or more from 1984 to 2003. Overall, the proportions of all age demographics adhered to rising trends, albeit to different degrees, with the 15-24-year-olds recording the highest percentage of visits. Notably, the younger groups of people registered higher percentages of visits than older people. The relativel

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on television has bad consequences. Some people therefore suggest that the government should impose restrictions on them. To what extent do you agree or disagree? There is a view that reporting criminal activities explicitly and down to their smallest details has negative ramifications and therefore, certain restrictions should be imposed on them. I strongly

👍2

4 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The line graph compares the proportions of individuals of different ages in Europe who attended to gym once a month or more from 1990 to 2010. Overall, all demographics adhered to rising trends, albeit to varying degrees, with people aged 18-24 recording the biggest increase by the end of the given year. It is also clear that younger age groups registered higher percentages of attendance than their older counterparts

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

We are now closer to 2032 than we are to 2020. Think about it.

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC56 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

If every place is looking dark, look more closely, maybe you're the light. Or the problem.

🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Some people argue that primary schools focus too much on formal learning. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? How important do you think it is for children to play as well as learn in the primary school classroom? There is a view that primary schools are exessively focused on formal learning. I strongly agree with this statement and believe that it is highly essential to incorporate interesting classroo

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ilhomjons_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ilhomjon's Blog | English” (@Ilhomjons_blog), 316 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ilhomjons_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.