Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖳𝗁𝖤 𝖫𝗎𝖢𝖺𝖲

Channel

𝖳𝗁𝖤 𝖫𝗎𝖢𝖺𝖲

@Il_l_l0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

224subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002960041347
TypeChannel
Username@Il_l_l0
Created4 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded19 September 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Il_l_l0

Growth

22423022719 September 2026 — 230 subscribers19 September 2026 — 230 subscribers26 September 2026 — 224 subscribers19 September 202626 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 03:40224-6
19 Sept 2026, 13:22230no change
19 Sept 2026, 12:47230first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 4 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.4%
avg views ÷ 224 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held6 (4 October 2025 – 9 September 2026)
Views total160
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

204 reactions across 5 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59022214148191732658642.2%
custom 58569729808730738682512.3%
custom 5861818069055182480209.80%
custom 5854884793543563758199.31%
custom 5312323621107049281167.84%
custom 5334536208414445193104.90%
custom 536606124689222783583.92%
custom 531204499369365791631.47%
custom 543851086836507094031.47%
custom 577828726445494233831.47%
custom 529222678622923611820.98%
custom 543853761312642301220.98%
custom 543856541444973038220.98%
custom 585261304790175481020.98%
custom 536642954033785906510.49%
custom 543820416475046331610.49%
custom 576927981609209408210.49%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC160 views16 reactionsread 19 September 2026

ڪَݪ اݪجَسِوݛݛ عَبݛݛتهَاا ݪووِحَدييَ ݪاا اأديَنَ لأاحَد بِشَيَء 🖤

custom 53345362084144451936custom 54385108683650709402custom 54385376131264230122custom 58526130479017548102custom 52922267862292361181custom 54385654144497303821custom 57692798160920940821custom 57782872644549423381

Signed 𓏺 𝑳 𝒖 𝒄 𝒂 𝑆 .

9 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC228 views36 reactionsread 19 September 2026

وفي زحمة المتشابهين أنا المختلف دائماً..!!

custom 531232362110704928116custom 590222141481917326511custom 53120449936936579163custom 53345362084144451932custom 54385108683650709401custom 54385654144497303821custom 57782872644549423381custom 58548847935435637581

27 May 2026, 22:37 UTC661 views55 reactionsread 19 September 2026

خيبت ظني ريتني ماتبهيت 🖤 .

custom 590222141481917326530custom 586181806905518248013custom 58548847935435637587custom 53345362084144451932custom 52922267862292361181custom 53664295403378590651custom 57782872644549423381

25 May 2026, 12:44 UTC716 views51 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Me : 𝐋𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐬. ☹️☹️🙁☹️☹️😣😝☹️☹️😣 𝐒𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐚 | 🇸🇾 | 🇵🇸 ☹️☹️🙁☹️☹️😣😝☹️☹️😣 @OX20X 🌟🤔 𓆩 @in8i4 𓆪 𓆩 @l_Y_Y7 𓆪 𓆩 @in8i4 𓆪 😵🤔🙁😝😤☹️🙁☹️ 𝐒𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐮𝐧𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐧.

custom 590222141481917326533custom 585488479354356375810custom 58618180690551824807custom 54382041647504633161

24 May 2026, 18:03 UTC707 views46 reactionsread 19 September 2026

〘 @Y_l_IK 〙 🕊 NO RIVALS 🕊

custom 585697298087307386825custom 590222141481917326512custom 53660612468922278358custom 58548847935435637581

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Il_l_l0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖳𝗁𝖤 𝖫𝗎𝖢𝖺𝖲” (@Il_l_l0), 224 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Il_l_l0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.