Будет интересно
❤14🤣2

Channel
@IdemoNikola
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
118subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002419301167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IdemoNikola |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IdemoNikola |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 118 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 121 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 122 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 123 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 124 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 124 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
228 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113 | 49.6% | |
| 😁 | 31 | 13.6% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 7.89% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 6.14% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 6.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 3.95% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 3.95% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 3.51% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 3.51% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 30 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Будет интересно
❤14🤣2
Йокич + Кристиан Браун на старте матча. Абсолютный чиллаут
❤12👏2
Если кто не понял, то сегодня был рывок 29-2 после большого перерыва.
❤7❤🔥1
В очередной раз неверояяятно приятная для просмотра игра от команды. Новички: Хардуэй - это пока выглядит, как сказка! Валанчунас дал хорошую работу на щите, успев даже соло по постапить. Джонсон, как всегда дерьмо..НО МЫ ВЕРИМ. Брюс Браун, снова ёбок! Он ожидаемо воскрес в Денвере!
❤8🤷♂1
Джонсон продолжает быть Беном Симмонсом.
🌚4❤3👨💻1
Блок пати, блок пати
🔥7❤2
В этом сезоне Пэйтон Уотсон должен был получать больше времени, так как по его будущему пора решать, плюс он является единственным бэкапом Гордона. Он и правда получил хорошие минуты (20 в среднем). Но главное: с ним уже произошел момент намекающий нам на некий прогресс. Случилось это в матче с Миннесотой. Где Уотсону дали заканчивать матч, вместо Кристиана Брауна, что невероятная редкость. Пэйтон идеально отработал…
❤13
Кэм Джонсон обморок
💯7🌚2❤1🔥1
Посмотрел прессконфу Йокича. Много стандартной шелухи. Уже хотел выключать, как вдруг! Журналист - «Чувствуете ли вы, что можете вздохнуть спокойно, и немного расслабиться, теперь, когда вас подменяет Валанчунас. Йокич - «Я никогда не дышу спокойно и не расслабляюсь, друг мой.» Журналист - «да?» Йокич - «Томас Шелби любил говорить «нет покоя мне в этом мире» если вы смотрели..острых козырьков» ааахаха я же говорил,…
❤9😁4🌚3
7 больше 10 Nice team work
❤5
Оч мало времени молодым дают. Ожидаемо, с увеличенным ростером, но печально. Холмс посидит..
😢7❤2
Вам надо про игру писать? Или ограничимся тем, что выкинули мусор из дома?
🤣8❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IdemoNikola. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Денвер Нугетс / mid iq content” (@IdemoNikola), 118 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IdemoNikola.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.