Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 54 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Sept 2026, 10:14
365
-7
16 Sept 2026, 21:58
372
-6
29 Aug 2026, 18:36
378
+2
22 Aug 2026, 16:46
376
-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:16
379
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:57
379
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 14 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 38s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
300 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5323734490219036081
129
43.0%
custom 5298540680212136775
88
29.3%
custom 5296598934087553354
83
27.7%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 5 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IamFoclli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2025 to 5 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Made a video for Kuper.
Kuper is one of the largest delivery services in Russia (formerly SberMarket). It operates in hundreds of cities across the country, handling thousands of orders every day from stores, pharmacies, and restaurants.
VK
Watch
Big shout-out to Georgy ♥️
I've been a bit absent from the feed — been putting in a massive amount of work behind the scenes.
Foclli.ru
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Did I start making videos?
Yep, I gave it a shot and put together my first video. It's definitely a quick, rough job — threw it together in a couple of hours — but hey, why not try something new?
I'd appreciate the support.
Click
Click
Click
Foclli.ru
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
How to Grow Without Burning Out
For six months, I took on hundreds of orders back to back. Every day was the same: edit after edit, client after client. My income was growing, but I could feel my skill level staying flat. I was growing the numbers, not myself.
And that's when I realized something simple: growth doesn't come from quantity — it comes from quality and interest.
Tip #1: Choose projects that …
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Year in Review
It's been exactly one year since I started doing video editing, and I'd like to share the results — let's break down each stage and look back at the different launches.
The Beginning
A coincidence that helped me find my path: I randomly posted an ad for something that was just a hobby at the time. The first orders gave me a push and motivated me to dive even deeper into editing.
Six Months…
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
SFX
I updated my library a bit — added some Apple system sounds and also saved the music from my recent projects.
Help yourself, I've dropped the link in the comments.
Foclli.ru
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
M4 Pro
I've been a bit MIA — wrapped up some projects, saved up, and made a little dream come true.
Coming from my old Ryzen 5 5500U laptop, this thing is an absolute joy.
Leveling up.
Foclli.ru
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
The most interesting project
Probably the most interesting video I've ever worked on. I was tasked with doing the color correction and sound effects.
I'm grateful to the people who found me for this — I was genuinely captivated by this piece of art.
The dance reflects the daily routine, a typical workday.
Foclli.ru
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
A new chapter has arrived.
I finished my studies. At first I liked my field, but then I found myself in something else.
I'll keep growing my business, but now on a bigger scale. I closed out some projects and focused on one thing.
I'm building my presence in the media space — just recently got verified on Instagram. I'd really appreciate your support over there.
I'm leveling up. Not long ago — just six …
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
I'm a meme
Haha, this guy made my day
He made this hilarious video where he's voicing my brief
(Don't do what I do)
https://t.me/ymglwblog
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
What kinds of video editors are out there?
I started thinking about this when a client asked me, "Why do I see the same work from almost everyone?"
The top — Experts: Editors who've made a name for themselves in the industry. Experienced and in demand.
The middle — Individuals: Editors who are just starting their journey. They're improving every day and working toward results.
The bottom — The Factor…
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
I've been wanting to go deeper into these areas for a while now.
I've only read a bit so far, but I'm already seeing mistakes and figuring out a future strategy.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Lately, I've been completely swamped — editing every day, trying out new styles, experimenting, and now here we are!
Over the past 2–3 months, I've genuinely leveled up. I can feel the progress, I'm genuinely enjoying the growth — everything's moving forward.
I'll be posting all my recent work soon and updating my portfolio. Got some stuff I'm really proud of.
Advice for beginners: practice. Knowledge is…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IamFoclli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@IamFoclli named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ymglwblog named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Foclli | Creator” (@IamFoclli), 365 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IamFoclli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.