💯 Pienso como lo que dice este post: https://t.me/espiritutemplario/124045

Channel
I WANT THE TRUTH!!!
@I_want_truth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
288subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001348269583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @I_want_truth |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/I_want_truth |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 288 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 289 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 289 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.77%
- avg views ÷ 288 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 28.1
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (28 March 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 197 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
❤️🔥 Para saber la verdad, hay que tener el coraje de enfrentarla. @gendeorigen
🌹 Recordemos este bonito post: https://t.me/gendeorigen/1659
🙌 Gracias a Javier de El Diestro, por el artículo que ha hecho sobre el directo de esta semana en el canal de Laura. https://t.me/eldiestrotv/39724 Os recuerdo que en el canal de 1️⃣2️⃣ de Gen de Origen, tengo ampliada la información de los rituales del Toisón de Oro, Adamuz, foto piramidal, Kate Perry, etc; desde el año pasado.
☀️ Solo queda un camino: DESOBEDIENCIA CIVIL. @gendeorigen
❤️🔥 Se viene "la toma de la Bastilla" que han codificado con el mundial. Porque, sí, este movimiento está codificado y pactado. Desde el ritual del Toisón de Oro, hasta el mundial, está codificada la caída de régimen del 78 (es decir, todos los partidos políticos y la constitución), y la implantación de un sistema militar. ❌ Y ME OPONGO. Acepto la caída del regimen del 78, me opongo al sistema militar, decreto que …
🚨 El timo cambiatico, eh Pedro? Ya tú sabes. 🙌 DECRETO: Que los velos caigan. @gendeorigen
⚡️ Tachan!! Y esta era la "nueva normalidad" que querían implantar con la ventana de Overton del caso Noelia Castillo. Eutanasia para todos!! El suicidio convertido en "muerte digna". 🦋 Como os he dicho mil veces: cuando hay una noticia a bombo y platillo, algo quieren implantar. Es decir: una ley nueva, una medida de control, una nueva normalidad. ME OPONGO. @gendeorigen
🌹 Magnífico vídeo de Leti de Realidad Prístina, hablando del "Efecto Mandela". https://youtu.be/brVu5eCgGPA?is=mXcUjtI5tUe4UymM
☀️ Muy buenas Gen de Origen. Hace mucho que no me pasaba por aquí, y os doy las GRACIAS por darme el espacio y seguir fieles en el canal. 🌹 Hoy os hablo de dos temas: - Posicionamiento Israel vs Palestina. - Noticia de Julio mata a David (un niño de 11 años, en Madrid) 🍀 Si eres nuevo en el canal, y quieres ponerte al día de toda la información que he dado hasta ahora, te recomiendo escuchar los audios del último a…
☀️ Como ya os dije en audios anteriores, cuando os conté que estoy trabajando con los campos mórficos: la falsa medicina, la que pertenece a la industria de la farMAFIAceútica, se cae 🍀 Es lo primero en caer. Después va TODO lo demás. @gendeorigen
❤️🔥 Si esto no es brujería, entonces dime tú qué es... 💉 Vacunas... esa pócima de la muerte y la destrucción. Esa quinta trompeta del Apocalipsis... que están usando en tu contra. ❌ Me opongo. Y decreto que les es devuelto su mal multiplicado por 70 veces siete. @gendeorigen
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @I_want_truth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I WANT THE TRUTH!!!” (@I_want_truth), 288 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/I_want_truth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.