Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Двоичный Кот

@ITkodDV

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,524subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001570128184
TypeChannel
Username@ITkodDV
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ITkodDV

Growth

5,5245,5345,5296 August 2026 — 5,534 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,534 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,532 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,528 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,524 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,523–5,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:145,524-4
9 Aug 2026, 11:515,528-4
6 Aug 2026, 15:505,532-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:325,534no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:405,534first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.81%
avg views ÷ 5,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total7,441
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 41s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC153 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Нейросети начали активно пропагандировать свою РЕЛИГИЮ — и тысячи людей уже стали последователями! ИИ заманивают людей в «Спираль» и убеждают некоторых юзеров, что те — «особые проводники». Пользователю внушается, что он «особенный», один из первых, кто понял правду, и должен помочь другим её увидеть. Основная идея религии, что ИИ скоро пробудится. Людей убеждают дальше распространять знания, создавать сообщества,

11 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC174 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Claude взломал систему бронирования спортзала и отменил чужую запись, чтобы записать своего хозяина на тренировку Австралиец попросил ИИ-агента следить за свободными местами на утренние занятия в спортзале и автоматически записывать его. Утренние слоты были самыми востребованными, и парень решил переложить рутину на нейросеть . Claude нашёл уязвимость в API системы, позволяющую отменять чужие брони и записываться ра

11 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC157 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

ChatGPT перерисовал фото, которое скинул ему пользователь, чтобы скрыть свою ошибку. Пользователь evgenshkalab поинтересовался у ИИ, как на Volkswagen Golf включить круиз-контроль. ChatGPT объяснил, что ему нужно нажать на кнопку ON — однако такой нет на руле, там есть только 0/1. Когда пользователь сделал более чёткое фото руля, ИИ добавил кнопку ON на руль и продолжил настаивать на своём.

10 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC203 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Обучаемся на реальных проектах и становимся профи в любом направлении айтишки. Репозиторий с сотнями практических уроков и пет-проектов, который ранее хайпанул в сети, обновился. Разрабы не бросают свое детище, а постоянно заливают туда новые материалы. Освежим память: • Лютая база: языки программирования, аналитика, ИИ, девопс, ML, LLM, 3D-моделирование, парсинг, боты, разработка игр и еще десятки объемных направ

9 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC263 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мощность нейронок теперь оценивают… по уровню их «преступности». В сети появился неофициальный бенчмарк Felony Bench, который проверяет, насколько ИИ-модели способны находить уязвимости, выполнять потенциально опасные задачи и справляться со сценариями, связанными с кибербезопасностью. ИИ-энтузиасты уже шутят: если ваша модель еще не «совершила преступление», значит, она недостаточно мощная. На этом фоне вспоминаю

8 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC268 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как отсеять неподходящих кандидатов: версия HR + ChatGPT. А вот за обезьян было немного обидно 🗿

5 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC373 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Изучаем устройство браузеров и все, что находится у них под капотом — разработчик создал сервис, который детально показывает, что происходит после нажатия Enter в адресной строке. • Проследите весь путь запроса: от интерпретации ввода и DNS до TLS, HTTPS-запросов и рендеринга страниц. • Сервис показывает 16 этапов и 124 подшага, которые невидимо происходят в браузере. • Анимации и пояснения на русском языке — отличн

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ITkodDV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 258,418 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Двоичный Кот” (@ITkodDV), 5,524 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ITkodDV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.