Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرکز خبر ایران | اخبار جنگ

Channel

مرکز خبر ایران | اخبار جنگ

@IR_EventsCenter

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,175subscribers

+263 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001399193526
TypeChannel
Username@IR_EventsCenter
Descriptionمرکز اخبار ایران خبرنگاری مستقل اخبار سیاسی ، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، ورزشی و هنری
CreatedBetween 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/IR_EventsCenter

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@TahlilPikniki/2124319 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC@IR_EventsCenter/57350 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC0.9810 hours
@TahlilPikniki/207428 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC@IR_EventsCenter/56941 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC0.975.3 hours
@TahlilPikniki/2124819 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC@IR_EventsCenter/57343 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC0.9676 minutes
@TahlilPikniki/2158625 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC@IR_EventsCenter/57624 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC0.9610 hours
@TahlilPikniki/248838 Nov 2026, 21:18 UTC@IR_EventsCenter/60587 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC0.959.9 hours
@TahlilPikniki/2087411 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC@IR_EventsCenter/57065 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC0.9544 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@TahlilPikniki19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.965.8 hours@TahlilPikniki (19–0)
@IraneAzad_News10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.951.9 hours@IraneAzad_News (10–0)
@comentiz9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.956.3 hours@comentiz (9–0)
@padeshahi_p7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9889 minutesthis entry (7–0)
@TahlilZamane7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.975.2 hours@TahlilZamane (7–0)
@Talangoor_News6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.959.5 hours@Talangoor_News (6–0)
@smaNewss6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.934.7 hours@smaNewss (4–2)
@hzrjvbi6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.963.6 hourseven
@IranianMinds5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9648 minutes@IranianMinds (5–0)
@KhbarMamlekat5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.973.0 hours@KhbarMamlekat (5–0)
@mameleekat5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.954.8 hours@mameleekat (3–2)
@OmidIranAzad13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9924 minutesthis entry (12–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 72 of the 72 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 541 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,39910,2609,829.56 August 2026 — 9,912 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,909 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,898 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,863 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,849 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,822 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,784 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,763 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,748 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,718 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,690 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,658 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,629 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,565 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,506 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,447 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,415 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,399 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,444 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,458 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,492 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,470 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,958 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,260 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,233 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,232 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,204 subscribers10 November 2026 — 10,175 subscribers10,1756 August 202610 November 2026
29 measurements spanning 96 days, net +263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,270–10,389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 12:1910,175-29
8 Nov 2026, 20:2110,204-28
7 Nov 2026, 09:5910,232-1
6 Nov 2026, 09:2610,233-27
5 Nov 2026, 08:4410,260+302
2 Nov 2026, 00:069,958+488
29 Oct 2026, 20:569,470-22
27 Oct 2026, 05:399,492+34
24 Oct 2026, 05:379,458+14
21 Oct 2026, 16:159,444+45
18 Oct 2026, 15:179,399-16
15 Oct 2026, 12:169,415-32
12 Oct 2026, 06:419,447-59
5 Oct 2026, 09:369,506-59
27 Sept 2026, 05:579,565-64
17 Sept 2026, 22:029,629-29
13 Sept 2026, 13:399,658-32
9 Sept 2026, 08:019,690-28
3 Sept 2026, 22:169,718-30
31 Aug 2026, 03:279,748first reading

Engagement

785 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 10,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
260 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
260
of 785 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 257 of 260 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held785 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total522,403
Reactions total9,242
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈28,200
Videos
≈20,300
Links
≈1,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 52m
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 244 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

33,325 reactions across 781 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6,68120.0%
🖕5,43416.3%
❤4,65614.0%
🤣4,53313.6%
😡3,62210.9%
👏2,1106.33%
💔1,9925.98%
😢1,0803.24%
🔥6451.94%
🍌5541.66%
🤪5271.58%
👌3180.954%
👎2590.777%
🫡2070.621%
🤔1810.543%
👻1060.318%
🍾990.297%
🙏930.279%
🎃690.207%
😍570.171%
4 further kinds1020.306%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 781 of the 785 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,325 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 785 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 785 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IR_EventsCenter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 785 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 260 posts held from the last 30 days (8.46%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 07:11 UTC≈1,010 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🔴 رقصِ ایشون توی کنسرت فرزاد فرزین، حسابی وایرال شده. فک کنم اینجوری بوده که فرزاد فرزین رفته مجوز بگیره، بهش گفتن نمی‌تونی از رقصنده زن استفاده کنی. اونم عصبانی شده گفته ما تمرین کردیم، زن نیاد کی بیاد؟ تو میای می‌رقصی؟ مسئول مربوطه هم گفته آره :)) 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

🤣32

Signed 𓄂𓆃

11 Nov 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,090 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

فقط دو تصویر از رضا شاه میتوان یافت که در آن لبخند می‌زند؛ یک‌بار هنگام افتتاح راه‌آهن سراسری یک‌بار هنگام بازدید از پل ورسک. 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

❤44👍2

Signed 𓄂𓆃

11 Nov 2026, 06:07 UTC≈1,160 views33 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

آیزنکوت میخواد با اینا ائتلاف کنه؟ نمایندگان عرب کنست هنگام نواختن سرود اسرائیل، سالن را ترک کردند! 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

😡31❤1👍1

Signed 𓄂𓆃

11 Nov 2026, 03:49 UTC≈2,130 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔴 ترامپ : تلاش دموکرات‌ها برای استیضای وزیر جنگ، بیت هیگز، با شکست فاحشی مواجه شد. تمام جمهوری‌خواهان، به جز توماس ماسی، که بزرگترین بازنده بود، به نفع بیت رای دادند. و بار دیگر، پیروزی‌ها در ونزوئلا و ایران، بهترین آمار جذب نیرو در تاریخ ارتش (با لیست‌های انتظار طولانی برای پیوستن به آن)، و روحیه‌ای که به ندرت شاهد آن بوده‌ایم، به تبرئه کشورم، آمریکا، کمک کرد. دموکرات‌ها به تسلیح و سوءاستفاده از نهادهای ایالات متحده…

👏32❤5

Signed 𓄂𓆃

11 Nov 2026, 03:49 UTC≈9,460 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔻مجلس نمایندگان آمریکا تلاش برای استیضاح پیت هگست را متوقف کرد ➖مجلس نمایندگان آمریکا با رأی ۲۱۱ به ۲۰۴ تلاش برای استیضاح پیت هگست، وزیر دفاع این کشور، را متوقف کرد. نمایندگان با ارجاع هشت ماده استیضاح به کمیته قضایی مجلس موافقت کردند؛ اقدامی که عملاً روند استیضاح هگست را در کنگره کنونی متوقف می‌کند. ➖این طرح را توماس مسی، نماینده جمهوری‌خواه، با اتهام‌هایی درباره نحوه مدیریت جنگ ایران و برخی عملیات نظامی آمریکا مطر…

👏23❤5🖕1

Signed 𓄂𓆃

11 Nov 2026, 03:49 UTC≈1,960 views36 reactionsread 11 November 2026

هگست ماندنی شد مجلس نمایندگان آمریکا با ۲۱۱ رأی موافق در برابر ۲۰۴ رأی مخالف، قطعنامه استیضاح پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ آمریکا را مسدود کرد. 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

👏30❤6

Signed 𓄂𓆃

11 Nov 2026, 03:39 UTC≈2,020 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026

مجلس نمایندگان آمریکا با ۲۱۱ رأی موافق در برابر ۲۰۴ رأی مخالف، قطعنامه استیضاح پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ آمریکا را مسدود کرد. بدین ترتیب هگست در سمت خود باقی خواهد ماند. 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

👏26❤6

Signed 𓄂𓆃

10 Nov 2026, 23:59 UTC≈2,290 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

راکستار با انتشار این تیزر کوتاه، یادآوری کرد که فقط ۸ روز تا انتشار موردانتظارترین بازی چند سال اخیر باقی مونده! 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

👍1

Signed 𓄂𓆃

10 Nov 2026, 22:56 UTC≈2,280 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🚨در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته، ۸۱ فروند هواپیمای نظامی در این منطقه شناسایی شده‌اند از این تعداد، ۵ فروند هواپیمای ترابری بودند که از خارج وارد شده‌اند، که شامل یک فروند بریتانیایی، یک فروند ترکیه‌ای و ۳ فروند دیگر با هویت نامشخص بودند. همچنین، ۳ فروند هواپیمای ترابری نظامی منطقه‌ای، ۳۲ فروند هواپیمای سوخت‌رسان، ۱۵ فروند هواپیمای جاسوسی و یک فروند جنگنده، و ۲۵ فروند هواپیمای ترابری نظامی که در داخل منطقه تردد داشته‌اند، نیز مشاه…

🔥12❤2

Signed 𓄂𓆃

10 Nov 2026, 22:02 UTC≈2,310 views57 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🚨🇺🇸مارکو روبیو: بیایید درباره تمام ناآرامی‌ها در خاورمیانه صحبت کنیم: یمن، عراق، لبنان، غزه، سوریه. ریشه تمام این بحران‌ها، رژیم ایران است. 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

👍48👌8❤1

Signed 𓄂𓆃

10 Nov 2026, 22:01 UTC≈2,270 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🚨🇺🇸مارکو روبیو درباره ایران: زمانی که اوباما تحریم‌ها را برای ایران کاهش داد، آن‌ها از این پول برای ساخت بیمارستان‌ها و دانشگاه‌ها استفاده نکردند. آن‌ها از این پول برای ساخت سلاح‌ها استفاده کردند. 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

👍34👌3

Signed 𓄂𓆃

10 Nov 2026, 22:01 UTC≈2,200 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🚨🇺🇸مارکو روبیو: چرا باید با ایران درباره لبنان صحبت کنیم؟ این موضوع به آن‌ها ارتباطی ندارد. 🚨『 @IR_EventsCenter 』

❤22👍15

Signed 𓄂𓆃

Showing the 12 most recent of 785 posts we hold for @IR_EventsCenter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرکز خبر ایران | اخبار جنگ” (@IR_EventsCenter), 10,175 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IR_EventsCenter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.