Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IPAPS2025

@IPAPS2025

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

451subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002405782607
TypeChannel
Username@IPAPS2025
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 8 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/IPAPS2025

Growth

451452451.57 August 2026 — 452 subscribers8 August 2026 — 452 subscribers13 August 2026 — 451 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 451–452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:46451-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:01452no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:16452first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 8 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 40s
Average length
2m 40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2744.3%
👏1524.6%
🔥1423.0%
👌34.92%
23.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 5 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 May 2025, 05:30 UTC667 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ اطلاعیه ⚠️ با عرض سلام و احترام، به استحضار می‌رسد که تاکنون فرم مربوط به تأیید و تکمیل اطلاعات مربوط به IEEE توسط برخی از نویسندگان محترم مقالات تکمیل نگردیده است. بر اساس بررسی‌های انجام‌شده، علی‌رغم ارسال ایمیل رسمی از سوی IEEE در حدود سه هفته پیش، در خصوص مقالات مرتبط با آقای امیرمحمد زارع و سرکار خانم فاطمه بلاغی هنوز اقدام لازم انجام نشده است و امکان ارتباط با این بزرگواران فراهم نگردیده است. نظر به اینک

1👍1🔥1

9 Jan 2025, 10:49 UTC≈1,200 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔰 بازتاب کنفرانس در رسانه‌ها 🔰 📌 پایگاه خبری دانشگاه تهران 📌 خبرگزاری صداوسیما 📌 خبرگزاری دانشجو 📌 خبرگزاری مهر 📌 خبرگزاری شرق 🌐 @IPAPS2025

👏41👍1

9 Jan 2025, 10:45 UTC≈1,380 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔰 بازتاب کنفرانس در رسانه‌ها 🔰 📌 گزارش صداوسیما از برگزاری نوزدهمین دوره کنفرانس بین‌المللی حفاظت و اتوماسیون در سیستم‌های قدرت (IPAPS2025) در دانشکده مهندسی برق و کامپیوتر دانشگاه تهران 🌐 @IPAPS2025

🔥6👏1

8 Jan 2025, 18:55 UTC≈1,600 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ اطلاعیه ⚠️ پیرو سوال مکرر مخاطبین محترم به اطلاع می‌رسانیم، با توجه به استقبال مخاطبان کنفرانس از جلسات کارگاه، تیم برگزاری کنفرانس در حال جمع‌آوری و تجمیع ارائه مدرسین کارگاه‌ها است و به‌زودی نحوه دسترسی مخاطبان به اسلاید و ویدئوهای ضبط‌شده جلسات، در سایت و کانال کنفرانس اطلاع‌رسانی خواهد گردید. 🌐 @IPAPS2025

👍16👏5

8 Jan 2025, 18:47 UTC916 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅ حامی برتر کنفرانس 📌 مهندس حسن آبنیکی 🔰 دفتر تحقیقات و توسعه فناوری شرکت توانیر 🌐 @IPAPS2025

👌3👏1

8 Jan 2025, 18:46 UTC801 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅ کارگاه برتر کنفرانس 📌 عنوان کارگاه: آشنایی با امنیت سایبری صنعتی 🔰 ارائه‌شده توسط دکتر امیرحسین جهانگیر، عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف 🌐 @IPAPS2025

👍1

8 Jan 2025, 18:44 UTC801 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅ مقالات برتر کنفرانس 📌 مقاله برتر در حوزه تاثیر منابع اینورتری بر سیستم‌‏های قدرت 🔰 عنوان مقاله: Inverter-Based Resources Impact on the Performance of Distance Relays Out-of-Step Function 🔰 نویسندگان: آرمین نوری، رضا بخردیان، مجید صنایع‌‏پسند 📌 مقاله برتر در حوزه حفاظت و اتوماسیون شبکه‌‏های توزیع 🔰 عنوان مقاله: Fault and neutral type classification in distribution systems based on deep learning models 🔰 نویسندگ

👏4

8 Jan 2025, 18:44 UTC654 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅ برگزیدگان رساله و پایان‌نامه برتر 🔰 رساله دکترا برتر - دکتر حبیب پناهی بروجنی 🔰 پایان‌‏نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد برتر - مهندس محمد سلطانی محمدی 🌐 @IPAPS2025

🔥5

8 Jan 2025, 14:53 UTC659 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅ برگزیدگان مسابقه امنیت سایبری صنعت برق 🥇 رتبه اول - تیم Hero 🥈 رتبه دوم - تیم Push RSP 🥉 رتبه سوم - تیم NimDa 🌐 @IPAPS2025

👍4🔥2

8 Jan 2025, 14:51 UTC620 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔰 پوشش زنده 🔰 ✅ تقدیر از مقالات برتر، کارگاه برتر، رساله و پایان‌نامه برتر، برگزیدگان مسابقه امنیت سایبری، تیم اجرایی و دانشجویی در اختتامیه کنفرانس 🏢 محل برگزاری: آمفی تئاتر دانشکده مهندسی برق و کامپیوتر ⬅️ برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر، اطلاع از آخرین اخبار و پخش‌ زنده رویدادها و نشست‌های کنفرانس، کانال کنفرانس را دنبال کنید! 🌐 @IPAPS2025

👍1

8 Jan 2025, 14:49 UTC516 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔰 پوشش زنده 🔰 ✅ سخنرانی جناب دکتر صنایع‌ پسند، ریاست محترم کنفرانس 🏢 محل برگزاری: آمفی تئاتر دانشکده مهندسی برق و کامپیوتر ⬅️ برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر، اطلاع از آخرین اخبار و پخش‌ زنده رویدادها و نشست‌های کنفرانس، کانال کنفرانس را دنبال کنید! 🌐 @IPAPS2025

👍2

8 Jan 2025, 13:11 UTC556 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔰 پوشش زنده 🔰 ✅ هم‌اکنون، سخنرانی جناب دکتر پیمان جعفریان، شرکت مدیریت شبکه برق ایران - دبیر علمی کنفرانس بخش صنعت 🏢 محل برگزاری: آمفی تئاتر دانشکده مهندسی برق و کامپیوتر 🖥 امکان حضور مجازی در مراسم اختتامیه برای علاقه‌مندان به صورت مهمان، از طریق لینک زیر فراهم شده است: ➡️ https://www.skyroom.online/ch/gm.igmc.ir/ipaps2025 ⬅️ برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر، اطلاع از آخرین اخبار و پخش‌ زنده رویدادها و نشست‌های کنفرانس، ک

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @IPAPS2025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 679,225 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IPAPS2025” (@IPAPS2025), 451 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IPAPS2025.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.