Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ห‹ ห‹ ๐ผ๐’ฉ๐น๐’ช ๐ธ๐˜ณโœถ๐˜ด | ๐“›๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ฎ๐“ต๐”‚ ๐“–๐“ธ๐“ญ ๐“†ช โŒ‘ โ‚Š

@INFErXD

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

36subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002225906578
TypeChannel
Username@INFErXD
Descriptionั ะดะตะฒัั‚ะฒะตะฝะฝะธะบ โ€”โ€”โ€” ๐–ฟ๐—ˆ๐—‹๐–พ๐—๐–พ๐—‹ ๐–พ๐—‹๐—…๐—„๐—‚๐—‡๐—€ ๐—…๐—ˆ๐—๐–พ๐—‹ [โ›“๏ธโšฐ๏ธ] โ€”โ€”โ€” ะฒ ะฑั€ะฐะบะต ั ะปัŽะฑะธะผั‹ะผ so fucking cute so fucking love you - @InfoLoll7892
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/INFErXD

Growth

3612 Aug 2026, 14:48 โ€” 36 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 15:01 โ€” 36 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:4812 Aug 2026, 15:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 35โ€“37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:0136no change
12 Aug 2026, 14:4836first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
263.9%
avg views รท 36 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.8%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held15 (23 January 2026 โ€“ 21 July 2026)
Views total95
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27
Videos
12
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ’˜4525.9%
๐ŸŒš3821.8%
customย 51905630334322318643218.4%
customย 5208783972624009845137.47%
customย 5208654324741211065105.75%
โค105.75%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ74.02%
customย 531877233411334635763.45%
๐Ÿ’‹52.87%
customย 539134022180564444331.72%
๐Ÿ”ฅ21.15%
customย 536392645057763261110.575%
๐ŸŒ10.575%
๐Ÿ•Š10.575%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for ยท 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @INFErXD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC95 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ใ…คโœจ๐™Š๐™๐˜ผ๐™‡ D N I ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ใ…ค ๐Ÿ“ŒะธัะบะปัŽั‡ะตะฝะธะต : : ะณะธะบัƒ ;; ั‚ะตััะฐ ;; ะธั€ะป ะดั€ัƒะทัŒั ( ะฝะต ะฒัะต ) ใ€ ใ…ค ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฆ : : ะพะฝะปะฐะนะฝ ะดั€ัƒะทัŒั ( ะตัะปะธ ั ะทะฐั…ะพั‡ัƒ ั ะฒะฐะผะธ ะฟะพะณะพะฒะพั€ะธั‚ัŒ / ะฟะพะพะฑั‰ะฐั‚ัŒัั,ั‚ะพ ั ะพะฑั€ะฐั‰ัƒััŒ ะบ ะฒะฐะผ ัะฐะผะพัั‚ะพัั‚ะตะปัŒะฝะพ )

๐Ÿ’˜7โค4customย 52086543247412110654

1 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC214 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ั‚ะต ะบั‚ะพ ัั‚ะฐะฒัั‚ ั‚ะพ ั‡ั‚ะพ ั guilty ัั‚ะพ ะปะฐั€ะฟะตั€ั‹

customย 52087839726240098457customย 52086543247412110652

27 Jun 2026, 22:04 UTC255 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ั ะฒัะต ะตั‰ะต ะณะปะฐะฒะฝั‹ะน ั„ะฐะฝะฐั‚ ัั€ะปะบะธะฝะณะฐ #1 ัั‚ะฐ ั€ะพะปัŒ ะฒัะต ะตั‰ะต ะผะพั ััƒะบะธ ๐Ÿคฉ

customย 52087839726240098456customย 52086543247412110653๐ŸŒš2๐Ÿ’˜1

22 Jun 2026, 02:26 UTC286 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

ใ…ค๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿคฉโœจ๐—‹๐‘’๐‘  ๐’Š๐’” ใ€‚ใ€‚ใ€‚๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ’œ

  1. ใ…ค ๐ŸŽ€ใ€๐‘ฐ๐“ท๐“ท๐“ธ๐“ฌ๐“ฎ๐“ท๐“ฝ ๏ผ๐Ÿ’œ49%
  2. ใ…ค๐ŸŽ€ใ€๐บ๐“พ๐“ต๐“ฝ๐”‚ ๏ผ๐Ÿ’œ51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿ’˜8โค2customย 52086543247412110651

12 Jun 2026, 00:44 UTC319 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/+f56GafpjvrBlYTE6 ะฟั€ ะฟั€ะธะผัƒ ะฝะต ะฒัะตั… ะฝะพ ะบั‚ะพ ั…ะพั‡ะตั‚ ะฒัั‚ัƒะฟะฐะนั‚ะต ะฐ ั‡ะต ะฑั‹ ะฝะตั‚ ๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ’œ

๐Ÿ’˜6๐ŸŒš2

24 May 2026, 18:39 UTC368 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @YesIkinnLCBPhoto

๐Ÿคฉโชฉึด๐“ข๐“ขเฃฉ ๐Ÿคฉะญั€ะปะบะธะฝะณ ะธ ะฅะธั‚ะบะปะธั„ั„ ะฒ ะฟะตะนั€ะธะฝะณะต ัั‚ะพ . . . ใ…คใ…ค๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน@EresXD & @Gikuu06_XP ! ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน ใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…ค @YesIKinn_LCB | #MainPairing

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ’‹2๐Ÿ’˜2๐ŸŒ1

21 May 2026, 20:25 UTC343 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐ŸŒš5๐Ÿ’˜3โค2

20 May 2026, 19:55 UTC293 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @YesIkinnLCBPhoto

๐Ÿคฉโชฉึด๐“ข๐“ขเฃฉ ๐Ÿคฉะ“ะปะฐะฒะฝั‹ะน ะบะธะฝะฝ ะญั€ะปะบะธะฝะณะฐ ะฅะธั‚ะบะปะธั„ั„ะฐ ัั‚ะพ . . . ใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…ค๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน@EresXD ! ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน ใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…ค @YesIKinn_LCB | #MainKinn

โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐ŸŒš1๐Ÿ’˜1๐Ÿ•Š1

12 May 2026, 22:50 UTC300 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿฅน. ะ ะตะทัƒะปัŒั‚ะฐั‚ ะธะฝั‚ะตั€ะฐะบั‚ะธะฒะฐ ใ€‚ 1?. @ Eres ๏ฝค๏ฝค 1 - ะ’ะฐัˆ ะฟะตั€ัะพะฝะฐะถ โ€” ะฅะธั‚ะบะปะธั„ั„! 2 - ะ’ะฐัˆะฐ ั†ะฒะตั‚ะพะฒะฐั ะฟะฐะปะธั‚ั€ะฐ - ะฝะฐ ั„ะพั‚ะพ !

๐Ÿ’˜5๐ŸŒš2๐Ÿ’‹2

30 Mar 2026, 20:15 UTC471 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ใ…ค๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน ๐Ÿฅน๐—’๐—ˆ๐—Ž'๐—‹๐–พ ๐–บ๐—…๐—… ๐–ฒ๐–ฎ ๐–ฟ๐—Ž๐–ผ๐—„๐—‚๐—‡๐—€ ๐–ผ๐—ˆ๐—ˆ๐—… ๐—€๐—Ž๐—’๐—Œ ! ! ๐Ÿ˜‰ ใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…คโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ ใ…ค๐Ÿค ๐˜Ž๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ถ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน ใ…ค๐Ÿค ๐˜“๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿคฉ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน ใ…ค๐Ÿค ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐Ÿ˜ป๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ใ…ค๐Ÿค ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฌ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐ŸŒŸ ใ…คใ…ค๐ŸŽค ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด ! ! ๐ŸŽ‡ ใ…ค๐Ÿชฆ๐˜š๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ใ…ค๐Ÿชฆ๐˜•๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿคฉ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน ใ…ค๐Ÿชฆ๐˜๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน ใ…ค๐Ÿชฆ๐˜™๐˜ฐ๐˜ฌ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐Ÿš‚ ใ…คใ…คใ…ค๐Ÿฅน ๐Ÿชฆ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฆด๐“ฒ ๐“ต๐“ธ๐“ฟ๐“ฎ ๐”‚๐“ธ๐“พ ๐“ช๐“ต๐“ต ! !๐Ÿค

customย 519056303343223186410customย 53187723341133463573customย 53913402218056444433๐Ÿ’˜2customย 53639264505776326111

28 Feb 2026, 22:59 UTC533 views11 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

customย 51905630334322318647๐ŸŒš3๐Ÿ’˜1

25 Feb 2026, 05:32 UTC575 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะธะผะตั‚ัŒ ั…ะพั€ะพัˆะตะต ะฑัƒะดัƒั‰ะตะต,ะทะฐะบั€ั‹ั‚ัŒ ะฒัะต ะดะพะปะณะธ ะธ ะฑั‹ั‚ัŒ ัั‡ะฐัั‚ะปะธะฒั‹ะผ,ะธะผะตั ะฟะพะปะฝัƒัŽ ัะตะผัŒัŽ โ€” โŒโŒโŒ ะปะธะผะฑัƒั ะบะพะผะฟะฐะฝะธ โ€” โœ…โœ…โœ…

๐ŸŒš6๐Ÿ’˜4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @INFErXD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jun 2026, 02:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz53 voters

ใ…ค๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿคฉโœจ๐—‹๐‘’๐‘  ๐’Š๐’” ใ€‚ใ€‚ใ€‚๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ’œ

  1. ใ…ค ๐ŸŽ€ใ€๐‘ฐ๐“ท๐“ท๐“ธ๐“ฌ๐“ฎ๐“ท๐“ฝ ๏ผ๐Ÿ’œ49%
  2. ใ…ค๐ŸŽ€ใ€๐บ๐“พ๐“ต๐“ฝ๐”‚ ๏ผ๐Ÿ’œ51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 21 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,027,605 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œห‹ ห‹ ๐ผ๐’ฉ๐น๐’ช ๐ธ๐˜ณโœถ๐˜ด | ๐“›๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ฎ๐“ต๐”‚ ๐“–๐“ธ๐“ญ ๐“†ช โŒ‘ โ‚Šโ€ (@INFErXD), 36 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/INFErXD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.