3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 395–396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 03:04
395
-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:52
396
no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:48
396
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
209.1%
avg views ÷ 395 subscribers
Avg views / post
826
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.969%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held
11 (9 June 2026 – 18 July 2026)
Views total
826
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
41 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30
73.2%
👍
8
19.5%
👎
2
4.88%
💔
1
2.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سه شبانهروز از صبحی که سپیده ابطحی، مستندساز، فیلمساز، تدوینگر و سینماگر را با یورش به خانهاش، بازداشت کردند، میگذرد. اما هنوز نمیدانیم او کجاست. چه نهادی بازداشتش کرده؟ بر اساس چه حکم و دستوری؟ و به چه جرمی؟
همین قدر میدانیم که او صبح روز چهارشنبه ۲۴ تیر ۱۴۰۵با هجوم مأموران امنیتی به منزلش بازداشت شد. گزارشها میگویند مأموران علاوه بر بازداشت او، وسایل الکترونیکی شخصیاش را نیز ضبط کردهاند؛ اما فاجعهی عظیم…
سپیده ابطحی، مستندساز، تدوینگر سینما و از اعضای خانه سینما، صبح امروز، چهارشنبه ۲۴ تیرماه ۱۴۰۵، با یورش ماموران امنیتی به منزلش بازداشت شد.
خواهر او با انتشار مطلبی در صفحه اینستاگرام خود از بازداشت این مستندساز خبر داد و نوشت که مأموران امنیتی علاوه بر بازداشت سپیده ابطحی، تعدادی از وسایل الکترونیکی شخصی او را نیز با خود بردهاند.
@VahidHeadline
📡 @VahidOnline
🕯️
هنرمندان جاوید نام :
۲۵. سیما موسوی / فیلمساز و عکاس
۲۶. رضا کرمی / نقاش و طراح
۲۷. یعقوب دلیر / خواننده و نوازنده گیتار
۲۸. مرتضی نعمت الهی / مجسمه ساز
۲۹. ندا محمدی / نقاش و هنرمند تجسمی
طراح پوستر: مائده نباتچی
کشتار و سرکوب مردم در دی ماه ۱۴۰۴ چنان گسترده بود که از عرصهی هنر تا ورزش، از نوجوان و کودک تا مادران و پدران، میان جاویدنامان یافت میشود.
کانون فیلمسازان مستقل ایران (ایفما) از همان آغاز خیزش دی …
کوثر افتخاری، از آسیبدیدگان خیزش «زن، زندگی، آزادی» و کنشگر اجتماعی مقیم آلمان طی تماسی با کانون فیلمسازان مستقل ایران (ایفما) از حکم حبس سهسال و هفت ماه ی علی صفری بازیگر تئاتر خبر داد. به گفتهی کوثر افتخاری که پیشتر بر صحنهی تئاتر، همبازی علی صفری نیز بوده، خانوادهی صفری خبر پیشین مبنی بر خطر اعدام او را رد کردهاند.
ایفما تأکید میکند که علی صفری تنها به دلیل آزادیخواهی، زندانی شده. او همچون هر هنرمندِ ایس…
روح الله خمینی در تابستان ۵۸ موسیقی را «مخدر» خواند و خواستار حذف آن از رادیو و تلویزیون شد.
خوانندگان و نوازندگانِ مردی که آن زمان «انقلابی» خوانده میشدند، توانستند با این استدلال که سرودهای انقلابی و جنگی برای تهییج مردم،در حمایت از انقلاب و رفتن به جبهه، بسیار مؤثرند، ذهن منجمد او را قانع کنند که موسیقی بماند؛ اما بیحضور زنان.
چند سالی بیحضور زنان در عرصهی موسیقی گذشت، تا آنکه زنان ایرانی با وساطت رفسنجانی و …
✍️
اخیراً به گفتوگویی برخوردم از یکی از فیلمسازان صاحبنام ایرانی در تبعید، که داشت از مشکلات نمایش فیلمش در ایران میگفت. در ظاهر فقط از اکران یک فیلم حرف میزد، اما در لایهای عمیقتر، ناخواسته تصویری از ساختار واقعی قدرت در رژیم اسلامی هم ارائه میکرد، تصویری شاید گویاتر از دهها تحلیل سیاسی. او وضعیت حاکم را “عجیبوغریب” نامید.
اما این وضعیت عجیبوغریب فقط مربوط به سینما نیست. این، چهرهی عمومی جامعهایست که د…
✍️
هشتادوهفت اشاره به میراث بهرام بیضایی
امیرعطا جولایی
این متن را به مجرد شنیدن خبر بهرام بیضایی، بدون طرحی قبلی و به قصد مرور آوردههایش نوشتم. انتشارش خورد به شامیران دی ماه و کشتار خونین مردم بیپناه ایرانمان به دست جمهوری اشغالگر اسلامی و گویی سینما و فرهنگ، پیش این فاجعهی باورنکردنی، موضوعیتش را از دست داد. مدتی برای وصل شدن اینترنت در ایران صبر کردم. بعد جنگ پیش آمد و حالا پس از سه ماه محرومیت مردممان از …
✍️
استاد گرامی، آقای دکتر اسماعیل نوری علا، در هفتمین دههی کار پربار فرهنگی و هنریشان، مدتی پیش از خیزش اخیر مردم ایران، با نگارش متنی دربارهی سینمای مستقل، تعریف آن، رویکرد جهانی به این تعبیر، و استنباط شخصیشان از کارکرد امروزین استقلال در خلق سینمایی، ما را مفتخر کردند. شوربختانه انتشار این متن، به دلایلی واضح چند ماه به تأخیر افتاد. وامدار مهر و شکیبایی استاد بودیم و هستیم.
برای خواندن متن سری به وبسایت «ای…
❤3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @IIFMA2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 422,391 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانون فیلمسازان مستقل ایران” (@IIFMA2022), 395 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IIFMA2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.