Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
IELTS глазами сдавших
@IELTScases
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
105subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002216589788 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IELTScases |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IELTScases |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 105 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 104 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 103 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 104 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 104 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Анастасия, добрый день! Я занималась у вас на интенсиве ноябрь-декабрь 2025. Хотела поделиться результатами экзамена.
👍1
добрый день! у меня: Listening 8.5 Reading 8.5 Writing 6.5 Speaking 7 Overall 7.5 мне для универа нужно overall 6.5, поэтому я очень довольна :)))
хотела сказать вам большое спасибо! я сначала занималась и на интенсиве, и с частным репетитором, которая утверждала, что она специализируется на IELTS (и ее мне посоветовала женщина, с которой я поступаю) так вот, она даже не знала о концепции overview, когда я написал task 1 без conclusion, но с overview в начале, она сказала, что это неправильно и пыталась меня переубедить)) в общем и целом, я от нее ушла и оста…
Анастасия, огромное спасибо за курс! Этот курс - лучик света во мраке курсов «IELTS на 8 баллов за 2 дня» и т.п. Такой структуры и досконального понимания, чего же от меня хотят, мне не давал никто. Параллельно развеяли кучу мифов. Появилось понимаете логики академического письма. Стало не страшно приступать к эссе потому, что в каждый момент написания знаешь, какой вопрос задать себе, чтобы логически верно развива…
👍2
ОПЫТ СДАЧИ IELTS В ДУБАЕ ОТ МОЕЙ СТУДЕНТКИ: Высочайший уровень организации и красоты вокруг. Но и цена соответствует: основной экзамен: 32 000₽, пересдача одного навыка: 20 000₽. Вывод для нас: ещё один аргумент готовиться основательно и сдавать с первого раза. Слово - Елене:
Анастасия, здравствуйте! С Новым годом Вас!🎄✨ Не написала Вам по поводу сдачи, сдавала в University of Wollongong в Дубае в начале декабря. По организации все супер было)) Overall на 6.0 сдала, Reading завалила на 5.5. Пересдавать не пошла (там сам экзамен около 1500 дирхам стоит, а One skill retake 900 дирхам) в принципе 6.0 проходной, но хотела конечно на 6.5 хотя бы😅 Спасибо большое за подготовку, если понадобитьс…
Само место очень понравилось) там кафешка классная есть где можно перекусить между частями) у нас сначала Speaking был утром, а потом все остальное
Photo, posted without a caption
Nailed it
Спасибо Вам огромное!
«SPEAKING, КОТОРЫЙ ПЕРЕБИВАЮТ, И WRITING ПРО КОМНАТЫ СТУДЕНТОВ: МОЙ ОПЫТ ПЕРЕСДАЧИ IELTS ЧЕРЕЗ ТРИ ГОДА» Слово Яне, моей студентке: "Три года назад я уже сдавала IELTS и получила 5.5 за Writing, сильно растерявшись на экзамене. Вывод №1: стресс и неготовность к формату могут «съесть» даже хорошие знания. Сейчас я уже закончила бакалавриат по лингвистике и чуть больше месяца назад решила поступать в магистратуру, по…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IELTScases. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS глазами сдавших” (@IELTScases), 105 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IELTScases.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.