Channel
@IELTS_Council
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
46,090subscribers
-98 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001043434910 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IELTS_Council |
| Description | admin: https://t.me/diduknow011 👆👌👌 فقط جهت تبلیغات موسسات مهاجرتی پیام بدید💠 👇 https://t.me/ielts_council_official/102 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IELTS_Council |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 46,090 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 46,103 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 46,117 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 46,132 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 46,146 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 46,155 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 46,172 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:10 | 46,181 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 46,188 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 46,188 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 16 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IELTS_Council. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 December 2024 to 2 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️ FLASH SALE: Full AI Access Package (90% OFF) 🚀 We are opening 100 premium slots for our all-in-one AI Telegram Bot. Get unlimited access to ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Midjourney without paying hundreds of dollars 💸. ⚠️ Price increases heavily once the slots are filled 📈. • 100% official premium models ✅ • Max speed servers (No queues) ⚡️ • Lifetime/Monthly plans cheaper than a single coffee ☕️ Lock in your lo…
File, posted without a caption
Many children these days do not have a healthy diet. ................is possible that this is because less healthy foods are cheaper than healthy ones.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👇Reference and substitution Join the following NOW👇👇 ▁▂▄▅▆▇█@IELTS█▇▆▅▄▂▁
For a higher score in #IELTS #Writing Task 2, make sure to thoroughly develop each idea before transitioning to the next. Strive to achieve a balance between depth and breadth in your argument for a higher band score. @Writing
#IELTS Tips: When taking the Speaking test, don't stress if you slip up. Simply correct yourself and carry on. The examiner recognizes that nerves can affect you and will value your ability to keep speaking fluently. 🍂🍃🍂🍃🍂🍃🍂🍃🍂🍃🍂🍃 سلام به دوستان و همراهان عزیز، جهت حضور در کلاسهای خصوصی آنلاين آیلتس به آی دی من در واتساپ برای هماهنگی پیام بدید. @Mehdi
Did you know that accurately using numbers can significantly influence your IELTS test score❓ Numbers appear in various forms throughout the exam, and mastering their correct usage will enhance your performance across all four sections! ✅ Writing numbers in the Listening section ✅ Using numbers in the Speaking section ✅ Understanding different number pronunciations across accents ✅ Handling numbers in the Reading a…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @IELTS_Council. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Many children these days do not have a healthy diet. ................is possible that this is because less healthy foods are cheaper than healthy ones.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2024 to 2 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 4,000 of 1,212,465entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@IELTS_Council named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS Council آیلتس ✅” (@IELTS_Council), 46,090 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IELTS_Council.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.