Channel
@IELTSCEFResult
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002261100911 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IELTSCEFResult |
| Description | You can find IELTS/CEFR results of Akbarshokh Gafurov’s students Main channel: @ieltswithgafurov |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 25 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IELTSCEFResult |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 12 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 12 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
11 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 8 | 72.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2024 to 14 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MULTILEVEL (CEFR) results: 1. Obidova Fotima CEFR B2(54) 2. Nurmurodova Munisa CEFR B2(62) Reading 65🔥 3. Bakirova Nilufar CEFR B2(53) 4. Xushboqov Azizbek CEFR B2(54) 5. Qo’chqorov Xondamir CEFR B2(59) Listening 68🔥 6. Yodgorova Muxlisa CEFR B2(59) 7. Nuriddinova Marjona CEFR B2(51) 8. Isroilov Isfandiyor CEFR B2(52) 9. Eshmirzayeva Munisa CEFR B2(56) 10. Qoraboyev Iqboljob CEFR B2(51) 11. Jo’rayeva Mumtozmahalbegi…
Signed Akbarshokh Gafurov
IELTS results: Juraeva Afruza 7.5 (L 8.5; W7.0; S 7.0) 💣 Kholboyeva Makhliyo 7.5 (L 8.5; W7.0; S 7.0) 💣 Fayziyeva Madina 7.5 (L8.5; R8.5) 💣 Sidikkhujaeva Adolat 7.0 (L 8.0) Muzaffarova Farangiz 7.0 (S 7.0) Tolipov Sanjar 7.0 (L 8.5) Yunusjonova Shakhinabonu 7.0 (W7.0) Bekimmatova Mardona 7.0 Akhmatova Nilufar 7.0 (W 7.0) Khaytimbetova Nilufar 7.0 (S 7.0) Dildora Choriyeva 7.0 🔥🌪⚡️💣 Yakhshibayeva Raziya IELTS 6.5…
🔥7👍1
#studentresult Another result which is 0.5 shy of 7.0 again :( The same is here, Listening is 🔥 @ieltswithgafurov
#studentresult Jamshid is 0.5 shy of 7.0 which is great result with 7.5 in Listening🔥 @ieltswithgafurov
#studentresult 03.08 Congratulations Munisa even it’s not your full potential which you can show) Next time you will ace it definitely💯 @ieltswithgafurov
#studentresult 29.06 Congratulations Mo’jiza, it’s an outstanding result🔥although you could have achieved more than that 📌@Daily_English8
#studentresult 09.05 Congratulations Sevara one more time. Although 6.5 isn’t a bad result👍🏻, I know you deserve more than that 📌@Daily_English8
#cefrB2 Congratulations Munisa🔥 Nasib qisa IELTS C1 qilamiz 📌@Daily_English8
#cefrB2 Congratulations Isfandiyor🔥 📌@Daily_English8
⚡1👍1🔥1
#studentresult 27.04 Last bombastic result of my youngest brilliant student Makhliyo who nailed the exam and got 7.5 which is perfect for the first attempt at the age of 17. Exam says its word and she is 0.5 shy of 8.0🌪️🔥💣💣 Well-done Makhliyo) 📌@Daily_English8
#studentresult 27.04 I should admit that Abdurakhmon was the laziest student in his group but he did an excellent job😄 Tabrikliman ukajonim👍🏻 📌@Daily_English8
#studentresult 27.04 Another achiever of mine Nilufar who always motivates the group before the exam with her positivity and smile🤓 Good job Nilufar🔥 📌@Daily_English8
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @IELTSCEFResult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@IELTSCEFResult named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Student’s result” (@IELTSCEFResult), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IELTSCEFResult.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.